Nike is Bad Imagine getting paid fourteen cents an hour to make a pair of running shoes that sell on average for one-hundred and twenty dollars. This is the average hourly wage for a sweatshop worker in Indonesia or China that make Nike’s running shoes and any of their other products. Thinking about this and how popular Nike products truly are, should we as consumers continue buying Nike products even though they participate in such “dirty” work. This issue about the sweatshops had first risen in 1991 when activist Jeff Ballinger published a post about low labor wages and poor working conditions in Indonesia. Although Nike was not the only company to use sweatshops, they were the most known and this is why they were put on a pedestal and people
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Behind the Swoosh is a documentary about sweatshop labor. As a class we watched the documentary and as I learned more about how Nike was running their business; I felt bad for the people that were working. I could not believe that those people were working hard making that company so much money and was getting nothing in return. Then again, I really was not shocked because I know that they are people that put a lot of blood, sweat and tears into a company and do not make enough money.
Nike has been around much longer than most would think and continues to be the leading trend setter in athletic wear. Nike was started in January of 1964. The athletic company began as just a small clothing distributing company out of the truck of Phil Knight’s, owner and CEO of Nikes, Car. The Saying you started from the bottom is very true when it comes to Nike who now leads in sales of all athletic gear compared to Adidas who at the time of 1964 was the most popular athletic company. From starting in a truck of a car no one would suspect that this company would not only be defined as the definition of ‘cool’ when purchasing clothing and shoes from stores all over the United States but yet the brand that carries our pop culture.
Nike used to utilize child labor, rock bottom wages, abusive condition, the customers boycotted Nike and now Nike is a place where you look up to it. American companies sometimes do not care about how the others company treats their workers and customers get things cheaper because they pay their workers
Nike provided a clear lesson on how supply chain ethics are made visible and can impact a brand. Nike initially had hyper-growth in the 1970’s and early 1980’s. At this time, Nike outsourced the assembly of it’s products to third parties in Asia in order to both drive efficiency and lower labour costs. When asked about their questionable business practices with some of these third-parties, Nike publicly stated that they couldn’t be expected to be responsible for the practices of its suppliers. This statement led to national media and activist groups sharpening their focus on the business practices of Nike suppliers and by extension Nike.
1) Explain Nikes success in Football since 1994 Nikes strategy in the marketing world has evolved every year, growing and becoming stronger and more world wide known. In 1994, Nike in the football world was small and wasn’t keeping up with the big competitor of Adidas. Nike took every chance they received to grow their brand internationally which started off with the world cup in 1994 in the United States.
David Montero explains that in Sialkot, Pakistan there is a business, Saga Sports, that creates the Nike soccer balls by hand, the problem Nike has with the company is that they employ children to work in unjust conditions. “In November, Nike severed its contract with Saga Sports, its chief supplier, saying Saga's poor management exposes Nike to the threat of child labor and other labor violations,” (Montero). The chief executive of Nike is trying to reduce the amount of children that produce their goods in unfair conditions. The executive wants consumers to know that they are buying products that were manufactured the proper way of not having children make these items in appalling conditions that could threaten their health. The evidence suggest that working conditions is another reason that the United States consumers should not buy products that are made by
Phil Knight, founder of Nike and creator of Sports Marketing in 1957, Phil Knight and Bill Bowerman met at the University of Oregon; the first, runner athlete and later graduate student in business administration at Stanford University, California, and the second, recognized athletic trainer who continually experimented with new designs for athletic shoes. Knight was always a man with a vision of the future; in his postgraduate thesis at Stanford University he indicated that the success was in designing a high quality product in the United States, manufacturing it in Asia, and selling it in the United States at prices lower than the then popular East German sneakers that were commercialized in that period. In 1962, Knight contacted the Japanese
Nike moves its factories to Indonesia, Vietnam, and China, when the cost in Japan became expensive. And the source of crisis is the working condition in these factories because of the accusation of poor condition, child labor, and widespread harassment
Nike’s first globalization strategy was outsourcing. Nike Inc. realized that manufacturing its products (footwear) in the U.S was expensive and to further export these products to distributors outside the U.S would be a massive challenge. This is because price affordability was a major concern for customers outside the U.S who would not comprehend why sportswear should be that expensive to buy. However, Nike Inc. took advantage of globalization by using the Japanese high-quality, low-priced production strategy by outsourcing all its shoe production to Japanese producers (Locke,
The Mini Case manifests that Nike’s core competency is to create heroes. Nike spends over $1 billion per year sponsoring athletes, and transfer its brand image via celebrity effect. Nike sponsoring athletes who with huge potential, or even from disadvantaged backgrounds (Rothaemel, 2015). Those people’s success stand for “impossible to possible”, Nike impressing its customers that everyone can become a hero by these inspiring stories. From 1976 to 1983, Nike focused on product innovation, and launched the Air shoe which significantly contributed to a reversal in declining sales.
This is due to Nike gets its merchandise generally from foreign manufacturers. To operate profitably, Nike need to get good value on products and supplies and, in turn, offer good value to its customers with accessible solutions. Publics: Many colleges and universities, especially anti-globalization groups as well as several anti-sweatshop groups
In this essay I aim to explore the significance of typography, design and symbolism in relation to NIKE, the multinational corporation that is the world’s leading designer, marketer and distributor of high-quality athletic footwear, apparel, sports equipment and accessories for a wide variety of sports and fitness activities. I will investigate the history behind the design of the legendary NIKE ‘swoosh’ logo, its evolution throughout the decades, and how this design has impacted the corporation’s success. I will clarify what the symbolism behind the NIKE logo means and the effect it is having on us as consumers. I will also look at how the NIKE brand identity influences our preconceptions of the product simply because of its eye-catching typography, design and symbolism.
Price Strengths 1. Low Cost Manufacturing Nike has a company who use the low cost manufacturing for production footwear. All of the Nike’s footwear virtually is manufactured outside of the United States by independent contract manufacturers such as Vietnam, China and Indonesia. Nike was operate multiple factories around the worlds. In 2014, Vietnam, China, and Indonesia manufactured roughly about 43%, 28%, and 25% of total Nike branded footwear and it has also operations in other country such as Argentina, Brazil, India, and Mexico.