Organ donation is a choice. Some people want to be buried with all their organs intact like God gave them, while others feel at an obligation to save lives if they can. Organ donation has much controversy over the years. I argue that organ donning is ethical to helping those who are in need of a donation, however that is if they are truly declared dead after a conclusion of many tests. Even though they may be considered brain dead, the help of life support still keeps their heart beating through the ventilation.
“More than 36,000 patients nationwide are waiting for an organ transplant. Less than half of these patients will be transplanted; about 2,000 new patients are added to the waiting list each month.” (1) There is a higher demand for the need of organ transplants in our medical field as more and more lethal diseases are being detected. Deceased organ donors are people who have either been in accidents that are brain dead or who have suffered a cardiac death. While organ donors save many lives every year, the majority of people waiting for an organ transplant don’t receive one because they die first. This is because hundreds of healthy, use able, and in demand organs are buried and cremated every day.
Many reasons have the ability to lead people to be fear of health complication. For example, some potential donors have hesitated and felt unsafe about donation their organs, because it is not easy to remove a part from inside the living body. On the other hand, doctors point out that some people who donate their organ will suffer from body distortion. Which means, doctors agree about that eradication the organ from dead people be better than living people to avoid any negative harm that can affect the body either from inside or out side. In fact, health professionals work on raise awareness about organ donation after death because that will help to make people satisfy and achieve the balance of availability organs.
With using this method Planned Parenthood help many patients receive care at an affordable prove even if they have a low income. Planned Parenthood is always changing prices as well to have the most affordable prices for their patients since they don’t want to offer their patients extreme cost for procedures. Planned Parenthood as well offers help for patients with no information. They work directly with patients to make sure they receive the necessary procedures they need with the fees and discounts that fit them the
Refusal of Organ Donation After Death Organ donation definition: it takes healthy organs and tissues from one person(the donor) for transplantation into another(the recipient). An organ transplant may save a person's life, or significantly improve their health and quality of life. Main Social Problem: Refusal of many people to donate due to many factors and obstacles. A chronic shortage of organs for transplantation has and continues to be one of the most controversial pressing health issues in many developed countries.During the previous decades, society’s behavior with regard to organ donation remains reluctant. A survey showed that although people plainly accept to offer their organs for transplantation, when a person
Lan told Kien, “‘What a cruel time… and so very long. The war swept away so many people’” (52). When she says this she feels her own pain, but also pain for others. She knows that there are women like her that are grieving for the loss of loved ones because of war. Throughout the war Lan lost many people and she tells Kien that he is the only one to come back.
The greatest impediment to organ donation is the refusal of family consent . Organ donation rates could be increased by enhancing the quality of hospital care and ensuring that the request for donation is handled in a way that meets the families' informational and emotional needs
Families or afflicted individuals suffering under the tragedy of Parkinson’s Disease, or diabetics facing long-term sequelae of this common chronic disease must be offered the hope of safe options to treat loved ones if they exist” (Ballaro and Sprague). The author’s statement implies that human cloning can have life-saving advantages to humans. Human cloning is often viewed as something dangerous and horrifying, but the author is proving that it can be beneficial to the mankind. Currently, there is a plethora of diseases that doctors and scientists are not able to treat but human cloning can bring hope to scientists and the people who are affected by these incurable diseases. Looking at the opposing viewpoint, human cloning can be very beneficial to people’s health.
Furthermore, the government can spend money on helping poor people who need food and somewhere to live rather than on animals and plants. However, not everybody agrees with this point of view. Animals and plants are living creature like humans and people should protect them no matter what. If animals and plants are endangered people should spend money to help them, after all they are useful to us and people should have conscience that blame them if they let these species die without even try to help them. Government should stimulate the people to protect endangered
Others would go for euthanasia considering it to be of great financial saving where a nation, especially one that gives free medical care would be relieved off the payments. The same occurs to families affected as they would not be required to pay for their patients any longer But in spite of these been an advantage to them there are disadvantages that follows that in our perspective devalues human