Plackett–Burman design
ANOVA was used assess the screen the statistically significant factors for VASEME are presented in table a. The parameter effect 95% confidence level (p0.05) was found insignificant describing the significant model correlation between the variables and process response. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the main effect of vortex time (sec, X1), CCl4 volume (µl, X2) and temperature (oC, X3), their interaction along with quadratic model were evaluated. The polynomial equation for the response is as follows
ER%= 74.095 +7.948x1 +12.221x2 +3.406x3 −4.067x21−6.765x22+3.250x1x3 +1.500x2x3 (6)
The combination of condition of the variables (extracting solvent volume CCl4, temperature and vortex time) that maximize
…show more content…
In microextraction techniques, the dispersion of the extracting solvent in the aqueous phase, through emulsification by surfactant enhances the mass transfer of analyte to the organic phase. Nature of surfactant, significantly affects extraction process, through optimum emulsification. Three surfactants of different nature Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate SDS (anionic), Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide, CTAB (cationic) and Triton X-100 (nonionic) were evaluated for their effect on extraction efficiency, while other parameters were kept constant. The hydrophile–lipophile balance value indicative of hydrophilicity, SDS had 40 and Triton X-100 values were 40 and 13.4 were not suitable for this method, while CTAB value15.8 gave the best extraction of the all the analyte fig. Surfactant concentration is also important for the Different concentration 0.1-0.3mM of CTAB was further evaluated for the effective extraction; with the optimum concentration of 0.2mM CTAB gave the bets extraction without any chromatographic analysis …show more content…
Best extraction is possible with extraction solvent having basic properties like high partition coefficient, high vapor pressure, low water solubility and high boiling point, and its ability to extract the analyte. ref. Organic solvent like chloroform and carbon tetrachloride with constant volume were evaluated for their extraction capability and found that carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) had the excellent extraction efficiency for fipronil and its metabolite was used for the study fig. The volume of extracting solvent required for equilibrium was evaluated by the experimental
Prelab week 1 Calculations Preparation of 1.5μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=1.5μmol/L × 10ml V1=(1.5μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.1ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.1ml×1000)μL= 100μL Preparation of 3μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=3μmol/L × 10ml V1=(3μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.2ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.2ml×1000)μL= 200μL Preparation of 3μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=7.5μmol/L × 10ml V1=(7.5μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.5ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.5ml×1000)μL= 500μL Preparation of the blank samples The volumetric flask will be filled to the mark with 150μmole/L of stock solution to act as blank (reference). Additional two blanks will
Marwah Alabbad Post lab 10/21/15 Question 1: 1. Experiment 1: Number of trails NaOH concentration (M) Volume of HCl solution (mL) Initial volume of NaOH(mL) final volume of NaOH(mL) The volume of NaOH to titrate HCl (mL) Concentration of HCl (M) 1st 0.1023 25.0 10.05 36.12 26.07 0.085 2nd 0.1023 25.0 5.74 31.40 25.66 0.105 3rd 0.1023 25.0 9.84 35.52 25.68 0.105 First trail calculation: 0.02607L× (0.1023mole NaOH/1L)×(1 mol of HCL/1 mol of NaOH)×(1/0.025)= 0.085M of HCl
Next, about 10 mL of both solutions, Red 40 and Blue 1, were added to a small beaker. The concentration of the stock solution were recorded, 52.1 ppm for Red 40 and 16.6 ppm for Blue 1. Then, using the volumetric pipette, 5 mL of each solution was transferred into a 10 mL volumetric flask, labelled either R1 or B1. Deionized water was added into the flask using a pipette until the solution level reached a line which indicated 10 mL. A cap for the flask was inserted and the flask was invented a few times to completely mix the solution. Then, the volumetric pipette was rinsed with fresh deionized water and
The reaction was repeated 3 times and average rate noted. From these rates a graph was plotted which describes the relationship of the pressure produced and number of drops added. The reaction rates were measured by Kpa/min and were written to 4 figures for precise results. Time was measured by stop watch. Table 4 shows a summary of all the groups which participated in the lab session.
Characteristic property- Test 1- distillation Materials: Goggles, 250 ml beaker, 10 ml graduated
Using the thermometer, the temperature was measured and recorded. Then, the 25-mL graduated cylinder was filled with 25 mL of distilled water, and its mass was measured and recorded. The density of the water was found using the temperature and the Density of water index. Moreover, the calculated volume of water was calculated using the formula of density, and the difference between observed volume and calculated volume was found. This process was then repeated using the 50-mL beaker and the results were recorded.
These difficulties might have caused me to make mistakes on the amount needed to pipette or the type of substance. Overall, next time I would have made sure to pay closer attention to the pipetting portion of the procedure. Furthermore, we could extend this experiment by trying different kinds of
The main objective of this experiment was to isolate the compounds in a given mixture, which was composed of 50% fluorene, 42% o-toluic acid, and 10% 1, 4-dibrombenzene. Techniques of extraction and crystallization was used to perform the procedure. The two major compounds in the mixture (fluorene and o-toluic acid) was collected; these were separated by two major methods. The o-toluic acid was extracted first by using macroscale extraction and testing for acidity. By adding a strong acid to the aqueous layer, which contained o-toluic acid, the solution becomes acidic and also allows the solid in the layer to precipitate.
Introduction: In this assignment, I will be doing two experimentations on examining the impact of temperature on the Alka-Seltzer’s response time. The first experimentation that I will be doing involves some water that is room temperature. The second experimentation that I will be doing involves some water that is very hot. If I want to be able to figure out the impact of the temperature on water, I will have to document the time it will take for the Alka-Seltzer to go into solution.
Title and Authors Colligative Properties of an Unknown Adriana Garcia and Demonta Coleman. Chemistry 112-591 Introduction Cold-tolerant fish and animals survive the freezing waters and temperatures in which they live unlike other animals that could freeze to death due to their ability of lowering the freezing point of water in their bodies. This is due to freezing point depression, which is a colligate property, a physical property that depends on the number of solute particles in the solution. The purpose of the experiment was to determine the identity of an unknown solute by using the concept of freezing point depression.
Intro: Separation and purification of an unknown/complex compound can be done by using techniques such as liquid-liquid extraction, solid-liquid extraction, recrystallization, melting point, and thin layer chromatography. In this experiment, these techniques were used to separate excedrin’s components containing caffeine, excedrin, and acetaminophen, Each component has its own chemical properties and characteristics such as polarity, reactivity, and solubility. Knowing how to separate and purify compounds from each other is an important skill within in a lab setting. A few techniques for first initially separating compounds apart are liquid-liquid extraction and solid liquid extraction. Liquid-Liquid extraction involves using a seperatory funnel and release on varying solubities and different solids in immiscible solvents.
For 63.0℃, the flask was cooled when the solution in the flask become almost empty. 25 mL of chloroform and 25 mL acetone were added to the flask and distillation was started again. Samples (3V, 3L) were collected at about
There are multiple points both at 43°C and at 72°C which indicates that liquid was collected at these temperatures. Based on this information, it would appear that two different liquids were present in solution and that one liquid has a boiling point of approximately 43°C and that the other has a boiling point of approximately 72°C. The literature value boiling point for DCM in is reported to be about 40°C and it is about 80°C for cyclohexane. Based on the graph, DCM was collected from 4 ml to 22 ml, thus 18 ml of DCM was collected.
(0.01 moles of NaOH) x (1 mole Ca(OH)2/ 2 moles of NaOH) = 0.005 moles of Ca(OH)2 Tube 1: (0.0020 moles of CaCl2) x (1 mole Ca(OH)2/ 1 mole of CaCl2) = 0.002 moles of Ca(OH)2 (0.002 moles of Ca(OH)2) x (74.08 grams/mole) = 0.1 grams = theoretical yield Tube 2: (0.0035 moles of CaCl2) x (1 mole Ca(OH)2/ 1 mole of CaCl2) = 0.004 moles of Ca(OH)2 (0.004 moles of Ca(OH)2) x (74.08 grams/mole) = 0.3 grams= theoretical yield Tube 3 (0.0050 moles of CaCl2) x (1 mole Ca(OH)2/ 1 mole of CaCl2) = 0.005 moles of Ca(OH)2 (0.005 moles of Ca(OH)2) x (74.08 grams/mole) = 0.4 grams =theoretical yield Tube
Materials Required: 1. Pellets of Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) 2. Phenolphthalein solution (1%) 3. Potassium acid phthalate (KHC8H4O4) 4. Graduated cylinder - 10 mL 5.