A paper that fails to get proofread and edited is a paper that is destined for failure. Proofreading and editing is a very difficult task to accomplish. Trust is placed upon the task, as well as the person executing it. Nonetheless, it must be done, ideally from a non-biased individual. Proofreading is used to check for grammatical and spelling errors, while editing is the process of fine tuning the content and improving sentence fluency ("Editing and Proofreading"). The first step begins with reading the paper all the way through two times. Following, the paper must be edited with a focus on ideas and content alone. Next, the paper is read once again, concentrating on sentence fluency. Then, the essay is read and proofread one more time for conventions. This process may repeat once more to confirm all proper changes were made. The proofreading and editing steps must be sequestered from each other because the human mind is sometimes incapable of searching for multiple things simultaneously. Proofreading and editing a peer’s essay is the only way to ensure a successful grade. Knowledge of several specialized terms are needed to guarantee the best grade and to effectively proofread and edit a paper. The first term …show more content…
Just like proofreading and editing a paper, removing a band aid can be a daunting task that is feared by many. Both procedures are handled with care and are slow processes at first. It may hurt in the beginning, but by the end, it is a breeze. In proofreading and editing, it may be scary to face the task full force towards the beginning. As time goes on, it becomes increasingly easier and more comfortable to mark the paper completely with all the suggested corrections. In the end, letting the skin air out from removing the band aid and reading an improved essay both give a sense of
e. Double check: Did I double check spelling, grammar, and punctuation? Section D. With Week 5 assignment, I will have to intensify my S29,P21, TR 29, and forge my C.20. This assignment is asking me to review previous work and responses. It’s giving me detail instructions on what format the assignment needs to be written and how long.
“ The students will read the first sentence of each paragraph in the text. Each student is going to skim the text. (Appendix 4) Then they are going to discuss the main idea of the text in pairs. The teacher elicits answers.
She claims that the title and the introduction needs to tell the reader clearly what they are going to read. This opens the reader to the essay and the information in order to process the essay completely (Lunsford). She conveys that in the conclusion the writer needs to reevaluate the reader of the claim/ thesis. After that evaluate your sources in the paper, Lunsford suggests to organize all the sources In addition to drafting, the writer must proofread the essay to see if it needs improvement (Lunsford). She gives tips on proofreading the final draft before finalizing and
David Brooks’ “Support Our Students” is an essay on the problem of low retention rates in higher education that I really wanted to support. As a community college student, it has been easy to see first-hand many of the problems Brooks has mentioned, from the need for childcare to the exhorbitant cost of textbooks. However, the essay, and idea, have two fatal flaws that lend it to reading more like a timed in-class essay for a community college final than as a legitimate critique of President Obama’s proposal to make community college tuition free. The critique ignores the very real problem of enrollment; that’s flaw one. Flaw two, Brooks’ own solutions are vague, unsupported, and lacking any kind of concrete evidence or sources.
In this essay, I was taught how to read from a different perspective. I learned how to deconstruct, and reconstruct writing to learn the thought process of the author. Mike Bunn shows his readers a how-to process of analyzing any form of literature, explaining the purpose, context, and language. Throughout the essay "How to Read Like a Writer,” Mike compares analyzing writing to an architect analyzing columns, or a carpenter analyzing homes.
In Chapter One of Thomas Cooley’s The Norton Sampler: Short Essays for Composition, the audience was exposed to several strategies recommended for reading pieces of literature. These strategies were divided into three segments: Previewing the Text, Reading Closely and Critically, and Responding to What You Read. Each segment contained a list of either advice or questions the reader could heed to while analyzing their given text. Later, the chapter exposed the audience to the four traditional types of writing utilized.
The article by Donald Murray entitled, “The Maker’s Eye: Revising Your Own Manuscripts” provides readers a better understanding of the writing process and argues that writers learn to write, by writing and rewriting. Murray also contends that writers must learn to be their own best enemy. Well, I believe I have this trait covered! I will confess, that I purposely saved this course for last, due to the number of years between my last structured learning experience and returning to school to complete a BSN degree.
Students was randomly picked for the second essay. Gender-specific results were given at the end of the study. Boys used more tools to help them with their writing. The computer is correcting most of the writing for students. Girls performed the same on both essays.
This semester I completed Composition 2. During the course I wrote three essays. Like Composition 1, I had the option to rewrite my papers after seeing the grade. Having the chance to rewrite my papers was very beneficial because I could improve my grade, and more importantly, learn what I was doing wrong. Amongst my writings, three major flaws stood out.
My papers were continually filled with red pen marks that circled blatant spelling errors or underlined incorrect verb tense usage, making for one mess of a paper. On the contrary, whenever I looked over to see my best friend’s paper it was unblemished, without a single red mark to be seen. Yet, instead of being dissatisfied with my poor performance, I became motivated to improve my writing through reading. As a youngster, I quickly discovered the Junie B. Jones series, and, before I knew it, I owned the entire twenty-eight book series. Barnes & Noble became my second home away from home, and, for Christmas, I remember receiving peculiar stares from my peers when I told them that a gift card to the bookstore was at the top of my list.
Something I have found is that when you read something back to yourself out loud, one is able to catch more error than you are when you read to yourself in your head. For the spelling issues, I would recommend that the student remember to use the spelling correction feature on Microsoft Word and that will help them significantly as the misspelled words will be underlined in read. Word is also able to catch some grammatical issues and those will be underlined in green. To fix the usage issues that exist within this essay, is may be effective if the student also remembers what tense that he or she is writing in and try to make it a point to stick to that tense. While the student is reading through their essay, they should also delete all the unneeded words from each sentences.
Referring to an educational setting, when students are instructed to write a formal paper they often leave mistakes on their paper unknowingly or unaware of their mistakes due to the comfortability they have gained through online writing and instant correction, also known as autocorrect. Autocorrect is the software function that makes or suggests corrections for mistakes in spelling or grammar while typing. Frank Gannon captured the point concerning absence of proof reading in his piece English 99: Literacy among the Ruins by allowing the audience to visualize the decline of writing skills among youths in his college class. Gannon begins the piece by describing to the audience his new position as a college “philosopher” educating college students that were unable to learn in a higher-level English class due to the automatic assumptions that the students would be “overly challenged” (Gannon 215). As any individual would, the students in the class began to assemble into their own groups: “the bored looking girls, the jocks and the Bosnian refugees” (Gannon 216).
The fourth step is writing the assignment and correcting the mistakes. The last, but not least, is bringing the final draft of my assignment to the reading and writing center and asking somebody to review it. This last step helps me especially for the reading responses for the book Seedfolks since a person who did not read the book has to understand what was all about. Thus, following all that steps helps me in the writing
In “Decisions and Revisions: The Planning Strategies of a Publishing Writer” Carol Berkenkotter. Berkenkotter did study and experiment on Donald M. Murray to see how professional academic writer writes and see his writing processes. In this essay I will talk about how's my writing process is the same or different from other people processes. Planning and proofreading is strategies I’m using during my writing assignment During the any writing assignment
Not So Fast”, conducts her own study with a few colleagues to take notes on how students writing skills are changing. She decides to conduct another one twenty five years later to see how much the writing skills have changed since technology has been updated and became more available to students. She found that “students today are writing more than ever before.” Although we still have the same amount of writing errors as before, the patterns of errors are different. Many people argue that technology is only making our writing skill worse, this study helps to prove a different theory.