Literature Review
The level of scientific literacy has been measured in different ways using various instruments. Ozdem, Cavas, Cavas, Cakiroglu and Ertepinar (2010) examined the scientific literacy levels of elementary students who were enrolled in grades 6, 7 and 8. Data was collected from 946 student’s ranging from ages 12 to 15 from several elementary schools located in Turkey. Student’s scientific literacy levels were assessed using The Test of Basic Scientific Literacy (TBSL) questionnaire which was developed by Laugksch and Spargo in 1996. This instrument consisted of 110 closed-ended items related to the dimensions of scientific literacy and were divided into three sub-categories; physical settings, human organisms and the living environment.
…show more content…
It consisted of 15 items; 9 open-ended questions and 6 multiple choice items. Student’s responses to these instruments were measured both before and after the being taught using metacognitive instruction. Findings indicated that reading scientific texts embedded with metacognitive instruction were effective in developing 4th-grade scientific literacy. Researchers who conducted studies at the secondary level also report a positive relationship between Scientific Literacy and achievement after being exposed to an intervention designed to increase their Scientific Literacy. In their study Mbajiorgu and Ali (2001) investigated the relationship between the Science-Technology-Society Approach (STS), Scientific Literacy and achievement in Biology. A total of 246 student’s ranging from ages 16 to 18 years from four secondary schools in Nigeria were randomly assigned to either the experimental or control groups. Two instruments were used to test the outcome of the treatment. These included the Achievement Test on Reproduction and Family Planning and a Scientific Literacy Scale (SLS) consisting of 20 closed-ended items. The Scientific Literacy Scale was developed by Aikenhead, Ryan and Fleming and covered three aspects of Scientific Literacy. Findings revealed a weak positive relationship between …show more content…
These included the 110 item Test of Basic Scientific Literacy developed by Laugksch and Spargo in 1996. This questionnaire contains items from two major categories: science content and the influence of Science, Technology and Society. Additionally, the Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA) which was designed by Fraser in 1978 was used to measure the participant’s attitudes towards science and their scientific literacy. This instrument measured three dimensions: science content, Science-Technology-Society and attitudes towards science. Responding to these questionnaires were 279 students of which 141 were elementary education majors while 138 were science education majors. The data was analyzed using the SPSS statistical package in which descriptive statistics were generated. Furthermore, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Cohens d value was used to examine whether any significant interaction existed between the two groups of teachers and gender. The results showed that the basic
M1, Introduction There is always a question which can’t be answered by scientist all of which relate to the perceptions of science as there is difference in how science is currently addressed. Also, people have different believes, opinions and interpretation of science in general. Questions science is currently addressing- cure for cancer?
Cultural influences ranging from group ethics, religious beliefs, laws, and gendered roles factor into how science is portrayed in a community, and language is a tool that allows for the society to fit scientific practices and technology within the
• Look for differences between content understanding and science processes. • Note which medium the primary pupil uses (i.e., drawing or writing). • Look for details that indicate an understanding of the characteristics of objects or phenomena. • Look at the ways in which the graphic context indicates the development level of pupils. • Note the grammatical complexity of the writing.
In response to our society not reading literature as much as they should, writer Dana Gioia shows us the importance of reading as a society, he illustrates this in his article “Why Literature Matters”. He archives his argument by using cause and effect, persuasion, personal anecdotes, and by using research by scientists. Dana Gioia starts his story with a personal anecdote- “ In 2001 the National Association of Manufacturers” did many studies on two different types of people in the work area; such as working full time and getting paid hourly. The study showed the number of people who weren't taught reading comprehension was higher than the ones who were.
Dr. Derek Cabrera’s thought on metacognition, human and education is absorbing. He shares perspectives on four universal thinking skills: Distinctions; “Systems; Relationships; and Perspectives (DSRP)” that should be taught in learning institutions. Dr. Cabrera states, “Thinking is simply a process of structuring information and doing something meaningful with it.” Dr. Cabrera also argues that people lack critical analytical thinking, great at school work, but not real life situation. Education needs to be fixed from the bottom up; that can be accomplished by teaching thinking skills.
Science is something people have confidence in because they know that when science is involved in a study, that they study is
The data were processed and analyzed using SPSS version 18. Frequencies, cross tabulation, Pearson’s, chi-square test, ANOVA were used to analyze the data. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically
“Teaching science is effective when students existing ideas, values and beliefs, which they bring to a lesson, are elicited, addressed and linked to their classroom experiences at the beginning of a teaching programme” (Hipkins et al 2002). It is clear that students do not arrive in class as ‘empty vessels’, and Hipkins et al argue that meaningful learning and understanding occur as a conscious process whereby new knowledge is linked to an existing foundation. If the foundation is incorrect or confused, then true understanding cannot occur; at best facts or figures are memorised in order to pass tests without any assimilation of these facts into the learners existing understanding of the subject matter. Furthermore, children with misconceptions can convince others in a group to take their perspective (Snyder and Sullivan, 1995), rendering co-operative learning a destructive rather than constructive method of teaching.
Not surprisingly, girls and their teachers had the most amount of physical contact with each other. Girls would hug their teachers at times and often teachers would braid girls’ hair. With boys there was less contact – as was also expected – but most of their contact was granted due to some type of achievement. It mostly took the forms of high fives and “fist bumps”. I also did not observe any hostile advances made between teachers and students that included physical contact such as pushing or shoving during this research.
NEED AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY High School, the Secondary level of education is facing very harsh problems. The personality, attitude, emotional stability, morale, commitment towards work of a teacher determines the quality of education. The Secondary Education Commission (1952) rightly points out "We are convinced that the most important factor in the contemplated educational reconstruction is the teacher, his personal qualities, his educational qualifications, his professional training and the place that he occupies in the school as well as in the community. Reports of Kothari Commission (1964) says that “Of all the different factors which influence the quality of education and its contribution to national development, the quality, competence, and character of teachers are undoubtedly the most significant”. This statement reiterates the importance of teachers and their attitudes.
An investigation into the impacts of sex education on pregnancy levels, however, differs with Kohler et al. (349) by finding sex education as an effective approach to reducing pregnancy levels among adolescents (Chin et al. 282). Conclusion 1.
My knowledge of science is more biological based. I have received instruction in science my entire education process, but within the last ten years my knowledge has been focused on the biological aspects of science. I have very minimal knowledge of the field of astronomy even
Evolving methodologies for curriculum and instruction are essential to improving how we educate. McMillian positions that essential to this is understanding the value of scientific inquiry. He explains, “the principles of scientific inquiry provide the foundation for conducting studies…analyzing educational problems, making decisions, and designing, conducting, reporting, and evaluating” (McMillian, 2016, p. 7) to provide significant benefits for engaging students and affecting achievement. Among the changing methodologies is the consensus that the use of STEM-education concepts are necessary to prepare students for 21st century skill-building. Subsequently, this has led to an instructional methodology that highlights math-centered curriculum, and the instruction of science and technology as independent of core content.
Students are most essential asset for any educational institute. The social and economic development is directly linked with student academic performance. The students’ performance plays an important role in producing the best quality graduates who will become great leader and manpower for the country thus responsible for the country’s economic and social development. Student academic performance measurement has received considerable attention in previous research, it is challenging aspects of academic literature, and science student performance are affected due to social, psychological, economic, environmental and personal factors. These factors strongly influence on the student performance, but these factors vary from person to person (Irfan Mushtaq and Shabana Nawaz
Standardized testing may be able to save time and consume less effort but this is an unfair way of measuring one’s intellectual and academic capability. There are many factors—the student’s background, the external factors affecting him/her, the non-academic factors and the like—to be considered in evaluating such performances especially in the forming years of a child. Standardized tests may be unbiased but it is not the perfect yardstick for