DAICHI ONISHI TREVINO ENGLISH III 05/16.2023 Serial Essay Adnan Syed’s conviction should be overturned as the state's case against him was built on unreliable evidence, inconsistent witness testimonies, and an unconvincing timeline. In 1999, 17-year-old Adnan Syed was arrested and convicted of the first-degree murder of his 19-year-old ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee. The case has been reopened since then and is still ongoing due to controversy over Adnan’s innocence and questionable evidence. There is a severe lack of physical evidence in this case (reliable and unreliable). In the Serial podcast, Koeing states that; “The most incriminating piece of physical evidence against Adnan Syed was…a palm print. On a map… police found it in the backseat …show more content…
Jay had multiple reasons to lie and throw Adnan under the bus since he knew that the police saw him as suspicious. In another interview, the police and Koeing talk to another witness, and Jay’s close friend Jenn. She shared with Koeing and the police that Jay threw away and cleaned his fingerprints off the shovels and his clothing the day after the murder. (Serial. 04.06). The police catch that Jay is lying about the extent of his assistance in the burial since if he didn’t help Adnan bury the body he wouldn’t have any fingerprints to clean off the shovel or a reason to ditch his clothing. Even if Jenn didn’t say that in her statement and interview with the police, Jay being caught lying about something so serious brings a question to his previous statements and their credibility. When a witness’s testimony at trial is inconsistent with the witness’s past statements it is called perjury and it MUST be acknowledged by the court via (18 U.S.C. §1621). Because of Jay’s perjury and plea agreement, the court would have been able to void his argument and sentence him, however, it is also stated that: “The Defendant shall continue to cooperate fully with the State by providing full, complete, and candid information concerning the murder of Hae Min Lee. . .” (Jay’s Plea Agreement. 12). That clause is where Jay was able to corroborate his inconsistencies and change his story again to say exactly what the state wanted to hear. Jay provides a plethora of information for the state that is just credible enough to ensure that Adnan would be convicted and not himself. Jay protecting himself in court is why Adnan receives such an unfair
His testimony should have been further investigated at the least because of this. However, it was not, and since Jay was the only witness to the burial of the body, his word was
Adnan syed's original conviction in 2000 was based on cell phone records which purported to place
Jay knew things that he wasn’t telling the cops or he was simply hiding something. Wouldn’t it be better to just tell the truth rather than make up a whole bunch of different stories? Some might think that Adnan was the cause of Hae Min Lee’s death because he was her ex-boyfriend and he had a motive to kill her. However, the night Hae went missing Adnan still tried to make sure she was ok and hung out with people that kept trying to check up on her. For example, in Serial it says “Adnan called her house 3 times to check to see if she was okay because she didn’t pick up her cousin that day”.
The state uses Jay as their key witness in the case against Adnan, but Jay's story changed where Adnan showed him Haes body. Jay says in one of his testimonies that Adnan showed him Haes body in the Best Buy parking lot, then he changes it in his testimony to “I went to pick him up from off of Edmondson Avenue at a strip and he, uh, popped the trunk open and…”(Serial 05.17). Jay was a friend of Adnan’s: they smoked weed and hung out together. The day of the murder according to Jay was that he picked up Adnan after he killed Hae and left her in the trunk of her car. This is where the two different places that he mentioned where Adnan showed Jay Hae’s body is the Best Buy parking lot and a strip off of Edmondson Avenue are important because these places aren’t similar either, one is a tech store and the other is an outdoor drug market.
In Episode 1, host Sarah Koenig highlights how the prosecution's timeline of events is riddled with inconsistencies and relies heavily on the memory of key witnesses, including Jay Wilds. Jay's changing story is documented in Episode 8, where he admits to providing false statements during the trial. It's worth noting that the prosecution's case against Adnan Syed relied heavily on circumstantial evidence,
The map print. According to Sarah she says “The most incriminating piece of physical evidence against Adnan Syed was a fingerprint, or rather, a palm print. On a map..police found it in the backseat of Hae’s car.(pdf page 128) On the back cover was a partial print of Adnan’s left palm.” Out of this whole case this is the only physical evidence they have against him- which isn’t much.
This evidence shows and should have shown back in 1999 tha Jay was not a credible source and should not have been
Jay lied multiple times throughout the investigation. He was even known for doing so. One of his alibi’s, Cathy which isn’t her real name omitted Jay
The Prosecution's case was more robust than Adnan with the Prosecution using a combination of witness testimonies and cell phone records, painting Adnan as guilty. In contrast, the defense struggled to provide coherent and compelling evidence. Adnan's defense focused more on moving the blame to someone else, or they tried to discredit Jay's testimony. The only attempt to prove Adnan was innocent was by Asia McClain," Asia plus boyfriend saw him in library 2:15 to 3:15" (Serial 1.18). This evidence would have shown Adnan's innocence.
He has a 50 percent chance of going to a state where he doesn’t remember himself doing any bodily harm to Hae. Jay ultimately helped the cops solve the case with his first hand experience of being with Adnan for the most part of his quest to kill Hae and assist to bury Hae and leaving her car behind. Ultimately Jay may have had some inconsistencies but for the most part he kept his story a lined. I mean what are the chances of getting the right story to fit the cell records for the major events that happens during the crime
These inconsistences doesn’t make Adnan innocent there is problems with his story as well. An example of this is Adnan inability to remember where he was that afternoon. If he just repeating his daily routine he should have told police what he was doing. Throughout the investigation of Adnan, he has not given a clear story. In addition to Jay 's testimony, evidence against Adnan Syed included a palm print on a map that could not be dated, and cell phone records.
These two reasons are all that a person should need to believe that Adnan didn't have enough motive, or time, to kill Hae. Jays testimony sets the timeline and proves there is enough evidence, which is not presented by Adnan’s lawyer, to say Adnan is innocent by a straying story. The time period where Hae could've been killed does not match Adnan’s timeline. Jay, who is a convicted felon, was the only witness and is trusted to give a good story. Cristina Gutierrez, who was Adnan’s lawyer, had medical issues that distracted her from using useful information in his case.
However, the beginning ends with detectives interviewing Jay, an acquaintance of Adnan, who claims that Adnan repeatedly spoke about murdering Hae, and called him when he had supposedly
Your honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, opposing counsel, my name is Piper Travis, representing the defendant in this action. My client Adnan Syed was wrongfully convicted of a crime he did not commit. He was imprisoned for 15 years for supposedly murdering his former girlfriend, eighteen-year-old Hae Min Lee even though there was no proper evidence to convict him. One of his friends at the time, Jay, claims that Adnan killed Hae, but the inconsistencies in his story should make him more of a prime suspect in this case rather than Adnan. He states that Syed killed Lee and later showed him the body inside a Best Buy parking lot, and they later buried the body at Leakin Park.
She states “A year after Adnan was arrested and the case came to trial, Jay walked up to the witness stand. There’s a moment when Adnan muttered something to him” (45). By Adnan calling Jay pathetic he showed that he couldn’t believe Jay would rat him out. This incident shows that Adnan is a liar and is mad at Jay for going to the police, showing that he is guilty. Even after controlling himself through the whole case he snapped when he saw the man that betrayed him.