Smoking in public places: should it be banned? A large number of non-smokers are exposed to tobacco smoke in public areas. Stated by Hinds and First (1975), “Concentrations of Nicotine and Tobacco smoke in public places”. In some countries, smoking in public places is considered ordinary with no enough attention given to prevent the issue. Not many have enough information about the effects of smoking in open places and people that suffer from it. Most people start smoking because of peer pressure, stress, and boredom. In addition to these reasons, smoking in public places should be banned because it imitates the use of Tabaco and create second hand smoking.
Impersonating the use of Tabaco is a major issue caused by smoking in open places.
That is because; when a person is smoking in a public residence it might attract other people to start using Tabaco. For example, some see smoking (in general), as an act of toughness that makes the smoker look “cool”. So, when a person passes by a smoker in public, they might feel the need to smoke to look tough just like them. Furthermore, smoking in public places results in false messages to teenagers about the unacceptability of smoking. Stated by
…show more content…
It may be true that smoking in public is a choice taken by the smoker. However, banning public smoking does not take away ones freedom but limit it. In addition, there are private sections for smokers to smoke in. Studies from around the world showed that banning smoking in public places might reduce heart attacks up to 36%, according to Rutherford (2009). For instance, a smoker might smoke in front of an old person unintentionally, unaware that they suffer from breathing or lung problems. This act can make it worse on that old person because he/she is breathing in a polluted air. It is not considered freedom when it disturbs the health of
The government stepped in, knowing that the idea is similar to smoking, which is known to cause many different harmful things such as tar build up in the lungs, breathing problems, and even lung cancer. “Conducting a school-based
Most people who smoke say they started young, so putting an age restriction, having a more smoke-free environment, and raising taxes on cigarettes will prevent young people from being able to get their hands on tobacco products or wanting to. With less tobacco use in the world, more people will be healthier and life expectancy will rise, not only because they will not be putting dangerous chemicals in their bodies, but the pollution caused by cigarettes will decrease. It would be nice to see less littered cities and states and have more clean air to breathe. Overall, the country and the world will be happier and healthier. This will improve the lives of the people, though not everyone will always comply, but according to data in previous paragraphs if we try and make an effort tobacco can eventually become a thing of the
In my opinion and If I had a say in the banning of smoking, I would not ban it. No one is forced into smoking. It is a person’s own decision in which they decide to light up that cigarette. I do believe that there should be delegated smoking areas not only in some locations, but mostly everywhere. But having to do with making smoking illegal, I believe smoking should be legal.
Smoking that is the inhalation of hazardous substances in the body. In “Smoking is Bad for Everyone So It Should Be Illegal,” Sally Chen’s passage is too specific, and I cannot agree her idea of the illegalizing smoking. She argues that many people smoke in public location even though smoking is an additive drug and harmful and causing the death. Moreover, multimedia lead teenagers to smoke which makes them more “mature” and “sophisticated.”
The Benefits of E-Cigarettes Humans have grown on probably the worst habit of all time which is smoking tobacco. The amount of people smoking or starting to smoke is rising rapidly each year. Most companies such as British American Tobacco and Japan Tobacco are trying their hardest to improve their sales resulting in big profits. Companies like these have managed to keep the cost per cigarette down but the government are also adding more tax etc. to try and make people stop and not smoke.
Recently, there is a new invention that has become public interest from country’s leader to citizen due to the rise of one device that called e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes or Vape are electronic devices intended to deliver nicotine with flavorings, which up to 7700 different flavors and some other chemicals into vapor. The amount of users of this device has increased in the past couple of years, which contributed $6 billion to the economy in 2015 itself, this is so as it is often portrayed as a healthier substitute for the regular cigarettes though this statement has yet been proven true. The question is: should the government ban the use of e-cigarettes? In my opinion, government should ban the use of e-cigarettes because it is detrimental to health,
There is grey disgusting cancerous smoke through the air you and your loved ones breathe. I believe that smoking cigarettes in public places should be illegal for many reasons such as the health and safety dangers of others and even myself. Firstly those who believe that smoking should be banned say that cigarettes can affect smokers deeply in the long run. “Over 50,000 studies of the health effects of tobacco in dozens of countries have detailed its dangers.
In fact, those who smoke have their life span shortened by about approximately. However, the government must ban tobacco smoking in order to prevent smokers from lethal diseases, protect nonsmokers as well as saving the environment. The most obvious reason as to why tobacco should be
As smokefree.gov stated, the smoke “contains over 7,000 harmful chemicals, at least 250 of which are known to damage… [ones] health.” Also, the secondhand smoke “can… stay in the air for several hours after somebody smokes.” Therefore, it is harmful to secondhand smoke. B. Reason to listen: So, let’s look at why smoking should be banned in public places.
Stress is common for those who smoke and often times, people look to smoking as an alternative to losing weight, relieving stress or most commonly, both. This product is very deadly and popular to society. Once one takes a puff of this poisonous stick, the addiction will kick in and there will be no turning back. However, the pain doesn’t stop there, for the government, although attempting to ban smoking by placing a “No Smoking in Public” sign has little effect, the government would rather take the millions of dollars that they gain than encourage the ban of it’s most valued source of money. The government should create laws that makes smoking illegal countrywide because the profits that are made from taxes on tobacco promotes a negative impact on
Dr. Dresler’s first argument about why smoking tobacco products in public places should be legally banned is that secondhand smoke is dangerous for people of any age. Even though bans are meant to prevent secondhand smoke, it ends up increasing the amount of cessation among smokers. Secondhand smoke is a national problem for people of all ages and must be eliminated from homes, workplaces, and public settings. It is evident that secondhand smoke is having a major negative effect on health because, “greater than 50% of all children in the United States are still exposed to second hand smoke and 1 in 4 American children between 3 to 19 years of age live in a household with a smoker” (Dresler 1). The only way to protect yourself and your relatives
Smoking should be banned in public places for many reason many people do not like the smell of smoke nor want the smell of the smoke to get into their clothes. Smoking also affects the environment. For an example if someone is outside smoking outside near a restaurant and a family wants to sit outside and eat it can affect the family that is eating also if they have kids with them. Usually people look for places where no smokers are so thats why smoking should be banned from all public places. Some people also would not like for there kids to get influenced by others people smoking or to imitate it.
In the United States, children in public school are required to take a basic health class. It is in this class that children learn the negative long-term effects of smoking cigarettes. If a child comes home smelling like cigarettes all parents can guarantee that the topic will not be taken lightly. I can easily recall an earlier time in my life when I was against cigarettes but today such a position would sound hypocritical coming from me. Now more than ever, cigarette smokers are being scrutinized for ignorance but smoking remains seen at Georgia State as well as many other college campuses.
At the end of WWII, the use of tobacco, more than tolerated was indeed banalized even valued: woman and man smoked everywhere and in all circumstances, public and private places were involved by swirls of smoke. From 1950 to the present days, tobacco changes meanings, sliding progressively on the side of the unhealthy to appear as a suspicious, dangerous consumption, now banished from almost every public places. Tobacco became a drug after medicine proved the dangerous associated with its consumption when, finally, people changed their strong social and symbolic
Smoking has become a social habit nowadays. When people around are smoking, the person practically feel like he/she should be doing the same. And this is increasing day by day in our country. Smoking tribulates almost every organ of the body. It is the leading cause of more than 443,00 deaths each year.