Group decision making is a process where a group of people assemble to analyze problems or tasks, introduce and evaluate alternatives and eventually reach a solution. The chosen solution is no longer attributable to an individual but to the group. Considering group decision making progress, the outcome should benefit the group, not the members. Famous idiom says, “Time is of the essence.” In our days, businesses and organizations are not only obliged to produce high quality of products and services, they also have to adapt to the rapidly changing trends, customer behaviors and market status. Therefore, each organization should make hundreds of decision every week. Decision could be organizational, strategical, tactical, economical and should …show more content…
This can be explained with the social identity theory which Henri Tajfel came up in 1979. Hogg (Burke, 2006, p.111) states that “social identity theory defines group cognitively – in terms of people’s self-conception as group members.” Group members tend to take personal pride on accomplishments and feel ashamed of the failures. Furthermore, group members are in habit of celebrating the success of others which they are supporting. After a sports team’s championship, the fans celebrate as if they were the triumph and the rival teams’ fans feel dejected and …show more content…
(2013). Five Stage Group Development Model [Digital image]. Retrieved from https://pformacademy.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/five_stage_development_model.jpg As seen above there 5 distinct stages and a prestage for group forming. Prestage is where individuals are in their normal form. They are not in the state of forming a group or acting in one. The first stage, Forming, is simply the starting stage. Because it is the the first stage, it meets a great deal of uncertainties in leadership, group structure, member roles and group’s purpose. This stage also called the icebreaker stage since this is the stage where group members meet each other. Then comes the Storming stage, where the first conflicts arise. Some members accept the group’s existence but still try to act independent. At this stage a leader becomes prominent, many will question his authority but at the end of this stage there will be a somewhat clear hierarchy of leadership in the group. The third stage, Norming, is the stage where group members start to resolve their differences, respect the hierarchy and the leader and find a way to work together. At the end of this stage, group is expected to have a proper hierarchy, a clear purpose and minimum conflicts between group
The first five stages of coming together in the relationship are Initiation, Experimenting, Intensifying, Integration,
All members of the groups were on different levels of acceptance with who they are as a person and the process expectations. Although members on different levels and stages of steps, they all had the same commitment goal. They all accept who they are because prior to members speaking the have to state their names and admit their problems. For any member of the group to be able to handle the changes in their group, they must some knowledge about their group leading
This shows that they worked as a team with a specific objective of saving their friend. At the end, they all managed to save their lifes from Sid and their mission got accomplished. 4 stages of group Cycle- - Forming - Storming - Norming - Performing 1. Forming- This is the first stage of group formation.
Forming - This is when individuals interact with one another initially and start to get to know each other. 2. Storming - This is the difficult part of group communication as the group struggles to understand how to interact with one another. 3.
One of the most common action that businesses as well as individuals needs to face on a daily basis is a decision making process. Some of the choices can be difficult, other very simple , yet no matter on the situation these choices can have a large impact on our future life. As we are all aware, conflict can occur very fast and easily, so for the same reason it is important to learn how to effectively deal with these kind of problems. There are many different techniques which we can use while reducing the tension , yet the six step model process is known as the most effective.
During the norming stage, cohesion is established, conflict is resolved and members have good understanding on each other’s roles in the group. Members develop a sense of belonging towards the group and the leader could emphasize on harmony and unity to ensure the wellbeing of the group. This is the stage where the members are finally ready to start working together as a team and strive towards achieving the desired goals. Next, the performing stage emphasizes on problem solving and the completion of the task at hand. Member are committed towards their goals and are able to tackle any issue in a mature ways.
So I see the group being in the second stage which is storming stage. It was stated in the case study that there is different opinion about who should have the most control. Another point of disagreement is “Community organizer Mason Dupree doesn’t like the level of bureaucracy either.
In a group communication context Tuckman theorised and established the “Developmental sequence in small groups” in 1965. His theory on group communication, educates us on how people work together through 5 stages. Forming, Storming, Norming, Preforming and Adjourning. Forming is the first stage; and is at the very beginning of group interaction with one another, participants tend to behave independently and although willingness to communicate and get on.
In order to accomplish missions and tasks successfully, teams must be cohesive and unified, as well as meet and exceed the standard. In order to build teams, leaders must develop teams through three stages, formation, enrichment, and sustainment. The first stage, formation, is the stage in which the initial team is built and comes together for the first time. The second stage, enrichment, is the stage in which team members gradually grain trust in themselves, followed by their peers, followed by their leaders. The final stage, sustainment, is where teams are fully invested in their teams, and are proud of their group.
Why wasn’t Harriet Tubman an obvious choice as a leader? Harriet Tubman was not an obvious choice as a leader because she was uneducated, she began her life as a slave, she lived in a culture that did not respect African-Americans, she was barely over five feet tall, and she can not read or write. How did Harriet Tubman gain respect? Harriet Tubman gained respect because every summer she would risk her life by going south and returning with more people, which also gains people trust. She was also fearless, and she her leadership was good.
The external pressures significantly affect the formation of the team. Personal identity and complex interpersonal interactions result in a highly charged environment and a tense group
These five stages includes: 1- Oral stage - From Birth to 1 year 2- Anal stage - 1 year to 3 year 3- Phallic stage - 3 year to 6 year 4- Latency stage - 6 year to 12 year
In 1965, Bruce Tuckman proposed the “forming–storming–norming–performing” model of group development, of which encompasses the chronological phases necessary and inevitable for a team to grow, problem solve, and perform to its highest capacity (Tuckman, 1965). The first phase, forming, is the initial step in a team’s development that inevitably determines whether or not the team will experience success or failure in their future endeavors. The forming phase, much like its name suggests, encompasses the first instances of a teams meeting where plans regarding their task are discussed and agreed upon. In the “Remember the Titans” video, this stage is depicted by all of the members of the football team coming together for the first time, and eventually meeting their coach. Storming is the second phase in effective team building, and it is also a point in which many disputes between team members can arise.
This is the stage where the group members were not certain about their roles and responsibilities to perform duties and seek an advice and suggestions from the senior as they were confused, anxious and not sure of their part of the
Introduction Before I joined this class I have less idea about the group dynamic what is means, and what will do. In general, I was think group dynamics is interesting and will improve our self and it is important of future. Know after I finish this subject , the group dynamics was actually interesting subject . It helps me to improve myself to be better because every member want to work together to achieve for our goals. So I know there are many skills that must everyone have it.