Banned books should be accessible to students. Banned books are engaging, they convey the value of existence in a society, and they present a meaningful comprehension of real life issues that students can relate to. Authorities should not be allowed to limit our freedom. Censoring books means violating First Amendment. Authorities should not ban books
This causes library, teacher, group, or bookstore to consider banning books because of possible concerns. But, this does not only take away the book for one group of people, it takes the book away from everyone, even those who would benefit from reading it. Banning books is bad because banning violates people's civil rights, limits the opportunity for adolescents to learn vicariously, and reduces the readers exposure to
It is good to ban books because the ones that are banned have foul/bad language, are unsuitable for the age group it is designed for, and are very violent. I totally agree that not all books should banned because reading is good for people, but some people say that all books should not be banned and that people should have the choice of what they want to read. Then what if does not want to read violent books and books with foul language in it, and then picks up a book that they think looks interesting. Then they read something they should not have read or did not want to read. There are some things that never should have been written and that people should not read, those things need to be banned.
Additionally, most banned books go on to become classics. When you tell people they can’t do something it makes them want to do it more, so telling people that they can’t read a certain book makes them want to read it more and most importantly the banned books that are classic have an important message. In conclusion, books should not be banned, due to the fact that they teach us many things. Although some books have different and unpopular opinions, it doesn’t mean that they have less of a right to be read. All books should have an equal opportunity to be cherished and read.
Classic well-known books such as Harry Potter, Slaughterhouse Five, along with many other books have been banned. Books should not be banned from any school or library. People buy books simply because they have been outlawed, children should be exposed to the real life situations that books can offer them, and people should be able to read what they want. These are the reasons that banning books is controversial. People buy books because they have been banned.
No one would want a report home telling your parents that your son cursed from profanity in a book. Books with profanity cause children to use words that aren’t allowed in schools and many other places of the world. Cursing in books could change a kid’s whole appearance. In conclusion my opinion on book banning is that books should be banned based on their sexual content profanity cursing violence and more. Book banning is a necessity schools need to keep their children from cursing violence and many other things some books could contain that could cause a scene.
This truth hiding is also causes society a portrayal of deceitfulness, which can cause problems. Next banning books takes away a person 's First Amendment right; this means that we are not getting our right to speech as listed on the first line of the Bill of Rights. Banning books takes away our Constitutional rights, which every American citizen has. These are just a few of the reasons books banning is a huge national problem. In the
Banned Books are a Form of Censorship Some books are thought of as offensive and inappropriate and are being banned in libraries. Many librarians do not have the funds to keep all books in their libraries; therefore, some people think that the books that are left behind are being censored from the public. Since taxpayers are the people that keep libraries in business, they believe they should get to choose which books are banned and which ones are not. Opposing viewpoints suggest that libraries should keep any offensive books out of libraries without notifying the public. No form of censorship should be allowed in the united States, including the banning of books in libraries, schools, or any other public place.
Events in literature and history support the idea that censorship can often be a good idea. Since the days of ancient Rome, the government has attempted to prevent the outbreak of civil war by censoring radical new ideas. In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar Roman leaders are unable to prevent Mark
The first limitation is that censorship limits the ability of a society to advance in its understanding of the world and other topics. An example, is the exploration of diseases, “if sex-related topics are completely censored it becomes difficult to teach children and teenagers about the dangers of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and HIV/AIDS.” Censorship is also unconstitutional, “…it intrudes upon the freedom of the press and violates the freedom of speech.” This is imposed on when people cannot submit information to the press because of the laws of censorship. This act also makes it so one cannot say just anything without it having to be censored. The past shows us that the use of censorship has and still continues to be abused. “Dictators use censorship to promote a flattering image of themselves and for removing any information that goes against them.” Lastly, it costs money for the government to continue censoring information, where they do not have extra money to spend considering the United States is about 18.8 trillion dollars in debt.