Unconditional Positive Regard Case Study

850 Words4 Pages

Question #6: How can the coach approach assist in the holding of unconditional positive regard for the client? Unconditional positive regard (UPR) was defined in 1957 by psychologist Carl Rogers and is used in client-centered therapy. Practicing UPR regards accepting and respecting others without judgment or evaluation. This approach to UPR works very well with self-determination theory since practicing unconditional positive regard allows for the enhancing of the autonomy. Within relatedness, the coach is not judgmental and is accepting of all the clients positive and negative feelings. This creates an affectionate relationship which heightens the relatedness of the client’s experiences. When a coach practices unconditional positive regard, …show more content…

Coaching research literature is focused on the coaching relationship, and the ‘active ingredients’ of coaching are discussed and evaluated, and issues arising from relevance to future research studies on the coaching relationship. Question #7: How might a coach use beneficence to empower a client’s wellbeing? Martella and Ryan focused on beneficence, which is a sense of being able to give emphasize their role of self-determination theory. The three studies stated in the article found that beneficence is an independent variable that is a source of human wellness. The ability to give enhances autonomy since it requires an enhanced level of autonomy. It reinforces a feeling of competence within the environment because if one is threatened by it, it would be unlikely one would focus on giving. Relatedness is also affected by the need for positive relationships with the individuals, It is positive being able to give to others. In summary, wellbeing is enhanced by focusing on giving rather than …show more content…

This resulted in a significant increase in the goal attainment, transformational leadership and psychological well-being for those observed receiving coaching. The average change in the perceived quality of interaction improved for those who received coaching. It was also found that the closer any member of the network was identified as being connected to those who received coaching, the more likely they were to experience a positive increase in well-being. This research highlights the influence of leadership coaching beyond the individual

Open Document