Totalitarianism is a strict form of government with no means of privacy. People had to be careful of what they said and did because they never knew if they were being watched. This is a huge exemplification of loss of freedoms because the people had no privacy from the government. Another freedom that Stalin removed was religion. He stated that “the party cannot be neutral towards religion, and it conducts anti-religious propaganda against all religions because it stands for science” (Document 4).
Take the first amendment for example “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (Constitute 1, from U.S. Constitution). The reason modern american pulic have freedom of speech in that if someone opinion is different then they won’t be punished for it. While the whole point of the rights
Additionally, due to the government’s oppression, it declines to disclose information on the ideas, expressions and actions of particular tributes they oppose, individuals are completely enslaved by the center of control, the Capitol. Evidently, the Capitol denies to provide information from one district to another, simply to keep them isolated from another. Resources such as food and medicine are also restricted from use from the districts and the tributes which shows a sign of empathetic expression. “I want to do something, right here, right now, to shame them, to make them accountable, to show the Capitol that whatever they do or force us to do
The branched cannot pass any law that is unconstitutional or against the people. Petition of Right is when they King become answerable to others and not just God. The King said they were only answerable to God. The divine right of the Kings was a very unpopular thing among the people because the King couldn't be wrong, but they didn't want to disobey the King or God. Article 1; Section 9 is an example of the many ways the Constitution limits our government.
In Document B, the last few paragraphs state that no heir to the throne can change the laws. If he does, he shall be cursed by the gods along with all people who are in acquaintance with him. For future reasons kings may need to change the law, according to the well being of their people. Kings cannot change the code if it means they are willing to sacrifice their loved ones. Hammurabi’s consequence of hurting the people they love goes too
To equalize everybody, they are given a handicap to block any talent that truly stands out from anybody. Harrison is portrayed as a social deviant because he had a different point of view and opinion on this verdict. He found it immoral and wrong, in result to
The Regents ' prayer quite simply and clearly violated the 1st Amendment and should, therefore, be barred from the schools. The school had replied with the New York Regents did not establish a religion by providing a prayer for those who wanted to say it. Countless religious affairs are associated with the government. Reflecting the religious heritage of the nation. New York acted properly and constitutionally in providing an optional, nonsectarian prayer.
Montag no longer wants to be in or take any part of the illiterate, ignorant society. His society has a mentality that nothing can ever happen to them,”This is happening to me”(108).They understand everything that can happen, but they never imagine it happening
Therefore, despots have no rights to force religion upon their citizens. Also, this worldly rulers had no role in the whereabouts of the afterlife of the individual. The magistrate’s job is to maintain peace. This was a reaction to the bloody religious wars. With the Peace of Westphalia, change was sought.
Many police procedure guidelines even mention how racial, religious, sexual oriented, gender bias cannot be permitted. Article 2 of the Field Services and Standards for Recruitment and Training [13510 - 13519.15] says that “Racial or identity profiling is a practice that presents a great danger to the fundamental principles of our Constitution and a democratic society. It is abhorrent and cannot be tolerated” (“Penal Code - PEN”). This section itself explains that racially profiling someone is actually unconstitutional. It is unclear why California Law would inscribe these words and not enforce it on their trainees, otherwise, why else would this code be written.