The Pros And Cons Of Alexander Jefferson And Thomas Jefferson

1803 Words8 Pages

Rough Draft Politicians for two hundred years have invoked the Founding Fathers to defend their beliefs. It is understandable that as a society we place figures like Washington, Franklin, and Jefferson on a pedestal, as leaders of American independence they merit that recognition. Implying though, that the Founding Fathers ideas were in unanimity with each other would be a simple and mistaken assumption. These men, while intellectual giants in their own right, found little common ground on public, economic, and social policy. Heated debates, slander, and disagreement are as defining of the construction of the country as democratic elections. Alexander Hamilton was perhaps the most volatile and contentious of the Founding Fathers. His upbringing played a significant role in how he responded to insults or perceived slights. Thomas Jefferson’s opposition to Hamilton is well documented, and analysis of their feud has been exhausted. Diametrically opposed, their views on the future of the country fueled the creation of political parties and led to the two men emerging as the figureheads of those respective parties. While Jefferson is justly portrayed as Hamilton’s chief political foe, his opposition with fellow Federalist and Founding Father, John Adams, was no less volatile. John Adams was a member of the Federalist Party and served as George Washington’s Vice-President, yet he and Hamilton were not equals and initially had a strictly professional relationship that would later

Show More
Open Document