Part 1) What are your thoughts? Pros? Cons? And/or anything else you can positively contribute to a discussion? Cite specifics. (300+ words - 10 points) I personally haven’t not really pay attention to what contain in food before. And I hadn’t heard of GMO until I read chapter 3 lecture. It is shocking to me to see the statistic from the lectures PowerPoints, videos, and articles. GM food first introduced into the food industry in 1996. At first I thought that genetic modified food is a good change in the food industry because GMO food is combined genes and DNA of different food. This change will create variety of food, cost cheaper, increase shelf life of some food, and decrease some diseases for some plants. These are all the plus side …show more content…
However, he also stated that we pay much more for other stuff in order to make that certain food. Cheap foods bring many harmful effects in fossil crisis, healthcare, and greenhouse. Pollan pointed out that 20% of fossil fuel is used to make food, and 500 billion dollars are spent on healthcare. And it is true that more and more people nowadays are obese compared to the past. However, we can’t ignore the fact that our lives today depend on technology. People demand for something that work efficiently with less cost and less energy. We are growing up in the society where people compete with each other to success. They might prefer to spend more time in other stuff than focus to what they eat. Pollan encouraged people to eat more plants because plants cost less fossil fuel than other food. But plants are not that safe either especially GMO. Even though it might not cost that much in fossil fuel to make GMO but we have to pay much greater cost for the ecosystem. On the other hand, plants are more expensive than other food. A bowl of salad is more expensive than a Big Mac. People might choose Big Mac because it is less expensive, tastier, and have more calories. Moreover, U.S. government subsidized meat production a …show more content…
video clip/quiz. (200+ words - 4 points) According to the article, “Save the Monarch Butterfly,” the author claims that Monarch butterfly is in danger due to the fact that milkweed habitat is not available. And the loss of milkweed is due to intensive agriculture and other factors. Monarch butterfly came from Mexico and through many generations, they are now at America and Canada. State of Monarch encourage people to help out. They suggest people to plant milkweeds at home and other places in order to create more space for monarch butterfly. Monarch butterfly will bring a lot of beneficial into our lives including pollination and natural pest control. The video, “Dinner’s Ready: Let’s Talk About Sustainable Food,” shows the scenes of people gathering together and have a meal. It advertises people to join the online community to discuss about the food that are consumed by human. The topics about food whether the location where it is from, how it is made, how it is consumed, and what it does to the
This lecture is trying to shape what people are going to eat and where they are going to get their food from. Mark clarified that, “we need to start acting”, (Mark Bitman 2007, transcript 8:35). on the overproduction and consumption of meat and junk food. It is proven that the more plants we eat the longer we will live. This information is backing up his idea and showing that it is logical making him more trustworthy.
In The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Pollan encourages us to change the way we eat but he never instructs us on what consumers should be eating. He educates us on what we are eating and informs us of all the events that go on behind closed doors. By building and building on our knowledge, he can reel us in instead of driving us away with offensive remarks. He never attacks the fact that most of us eat without thinking about it. In doing this, he can calmly approach his audience with the facts.
GMO’s are somewhat beneficial for our rapid-growing population since they are more enriched with nutrients. (Global) C. GMO’s can also benefit the
Today, about almost every food that we are buying are GMO’s food. GMO’s are known as Genetic Modified Organisms, in which food has been artificially manipulated in a laboratory through the process called genetic engineering. Over the past decade, this topic about GMO’s has been widely discussed, whether it is beneficial or harmful to our society. The majority opinion of the conservation is mixed. As stated in the legislative documents called “Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organism”, support for the introduction of genetically modified foods into the food supply held steady at 26 to 27% of respondents in favor over that time period, while opposition to the introduction of such foods fell from 58 to 46% over the period.
( Koch, Taparia 15). Though some people say GMO’s are good because they increase food production. However we don’t need the extra food. And some people aren’t trusting large food companies because of the GMO’s they are selling ( Koch, Taparia 17). Since this is happening organic foods are taking over Grocery stores and going on the shelves big food brands with GMO’s used to be (Koch, Taparia 17).
The film Food, Inc. by Robert Kenner really opened my eyes about the way our food is made in America! It 's crazy how most Americas are blind to what 's in the food they are putting into their bodies; I sure know I was. Americans have come to love the foods that are cheap, instead of foods that might be a little more expensive but a lot healthier. The way we produce food now is outrageous. Most of our food is now genetically modified and not organic.
It is a report on genetically modified foods and poses the question of whether or not labels should be required on food that has been genetically modified. This report has many sections and one of the sections that will be the most help is the pro/con section. This section focuses on both the pro’s of not labeling GM (genetically modified) foods and the con’s of labeling GM foods, both stated by well known and credible CQ authors. Since this is a controversy essay, the fact that this report has both sides of the argument, it will be a
In other words, GM crops should have no toxic biomolecules and have similar (if not more) of the nutrients found in the non-GM foods.” Genetically modified foods have to get approval to be in the supermarket. This shows that GM foods are just as good, sometimes better than regular food. This meta study looked at the 1,783 studies done about GM food safety and found more than half done about environmental safety rather than safety to consume GM foods
GMOs will taste and look better, for example, McDonald's has admitted to altering their burgers. Which is why they look and taste so good. Many GMOs tend to last longer than normal food and some GMOs repel insects due to the modified ingredients. A very good example would be corn that is crafted by splicing into commercial varieties a gene (or genes) from a harmless bacterium. The bacterial genes express proteins that are toxic to corn-boring insects, but that is.
Economically, labeling would be a very costly process, and that cost would be put into food prices for consumers to pay off (Yang and Chen 1853-4). In one public opinion poll that asked participants how much they would be willing to pay on GMO labels, 61% of participants stated that they would only be willing to pay $10 or less. With the massive amounts of testing and work that would go into labeling GMOs, the price of labeling is expected to be much higher than $10 (Marchant and Cardineau 4).Not only would consumer prices rise dramatically due to GMO labeling, gmo-free labels have become a selling point for products (Yang and Chen 1853). One report states that 57% of Americans are worried about the safety of GMO consumption (Weise). Requiring GMO labels would be a death sentence to GMO products.
Genetically modified organisms help in improving crops, increase nutritious value in plants, increases its life, it has better resistance to diseases, drought or insect pests. I also agree to the fact that sometimes research and development are not done properly on Genetically modified organisms. We are not aware about the facts or figures of how much it is impacting humans. Consumption of GMO food is good or bad for human health. It needs some more time to reach humans for consumption.
GMOS Introduction: I believe that GMOS are good for this world and for the people because the gmos can save us from starving when all the food is gone. GMOS are a genetically modified organism is an organism whose genetic materials that have been altered using genetic engineering techniques. GMO foods are okay to eat because some food that have gmos could have some genetic characteristics in them to make the food survive the hot when that food has to be frozen. GMOS are different from foods that don 't have GMOS Body 1: GMOS can save the world because if we had no food because if there was a drought and the plants died. Then we could just plant GMO foods, The drought won’t really do anything to the plant.
Many of people argue that genetically modified food or organisms are the new way for a sustainable food source and a way to combat the war on hunger but in actuality
In conclusion, GMO foods are very dangerous. They should stop making GMOs so that we may live a longer healthier life. Getting rid of GMO food would also lower the rate of birth defects across the globe because it is to dangerous for a pregnant woman to eat GMO food without, in some way, harming the child. Scientists should discover a new way to make food more nutritious and last longer. Instead of making it to where there are more bad defects than good, we should leave it 100% normal and natural instead of messing with the
Regardless of what you hear on bias documents and videos concerning how bad GM foods are for your body and environment there are many positives. With an increasing global population widespread, world hunger is beginning