If we think the most important part of an entire school year in regards to a students learning is one end of the year test, we might need to revisit the purpose of education. Learning is supposed to interest the student and get them involved through activities and projects to find out what they enjoy and love. It’s not to temporarily memorize information in order to achieve higher classes, and better scholarships. There are more important things in education than a classes standardized test scores, and we need to be aware of the issues they may be
This can also indicate how your local area is doing compared against the national landscape. The students’ progress can be tracked over the years. When students take the same type of test yearly (adjusted for grade level) it is easy to see if a student is improving, losing ground academically, or staying about the same. (For example, if a child is taking a norm-referenced test and scores in the 75th percentile in the sixth grade and the 80th percentile in the seventh grade, you can see that the child is gaining ground in school.) This helps determine how a child is doing academically.
A lot of individuals believe standardized testing should be put to the end, and that students shouldn 't have to stress over these tests. The standardized tests bring a lot of stress to the students because they are pressured to perform well on the tests. If they don’t perform well on the tests and can lower their self confidence and cause them to give up on school because they believe they are not smart enough because they didn’t get a high score on their tests. As for teachers, they get stuck with having to teach for the test and not teaching students deeper understanding of a subject. The standardized testing is not fair and accurate because they evaluate students knowledge without thinking of other circumstances.
These tests used to not determine someone's future, but for every year that goes by, these standardized tests keep getting more difficult for the average student to take. It is defining who students are and that is not what these tests should be scored on. The idea of these tests are being made to select students in a faster, easier scoring area. Thousands of students take these tests every year to determine what college or university they will go to, and for public schools, it determines whether or not they will pass their grade they have been in. These standardized testing like the SAT or ACT, make it easier to judge a student.
Students with learning disabilities should be included in the “normal” classroom because it improves their academic performance, social behavior, and communication language. One reason why students with learning disabilities should be in the normal classroom is that inclusion improves their academic performance. In the article “Outcomes for Students With Learning Disabilities in Inclusive and Pullout Programs”, researchers in education programs conducted a study to compare the students’ academic behavior between inclusive and special schools. Throughout their study, the researchers took several factors into
Are standardized test truly a fair assessment of student’s abilities or not? What are standardized tests? Standardized tests are a test given to assess a student or a group of students using a test with the same questions and answers to determine students educational stand points. Standardized test are not a fair assessment for measuring student ability because they will not help students in the future, they can cause students to lose opportunities, and studies say standardized tests do not show true improvement. First of all Standardized test will not help students in the future.
From stealth assessing to digital portfolios, there are other options for assessing a student’s skill over a single test. To come back to digital portfolios, students compile all of their best work into a single portfolio to submit at the end of the year. Madison City School Districts took this approach and made the discovery that students had been progressing at the same rate as their standardized counterparts while finding school much more enjoyable and less stressful. This not only shows that standardized testing can be replaced but at the same time it can improve student’s enthusiasm and motivation for school. This is just one option though, and if digital portfolios are not the first choice then there are other options to pick from.
Meredith Broussard explains how standardized testing does not prove a child’s general knowledge nor creative in-depth thinking by stating, “Standardized tests are not based on general knowledge... they are based on specific knowledge contained in specific sets of books: the textbooks created by the test makers” (Broussard). Miner also states that standardized testing, “... leads to a dumbed-down curriculum that values rote memorization over in-depth thinking, exacerbates inequities for low-income students and students of color, and undermines true accountability among schools, parents, and community” (Miner). The assessment of a child should encourage a child to want to learn for the sake of learning. Alternative assessments could address a child’s development and learning process. These evaluations can determine why children are more likely to read behind grade level, instead of highlighting their inabilities.
This type of standardized tests are used to measure how well an individual does relative to other people who have taken the test. An obvious disadvantage of norm-referenced tests is that it cannot measure progress of the population of a whole, only where individuals fall within the whole. Thus, only measuring against a fixed goal can be used to measure the success of an educational reform program which seeks to raise the achievement of all students against new standards which seek to assess skills beyond choosing among multiple choices. In such approach distribution could written
This article summarized the supporting view of standardized testing. Supporters propose that the goals of standardized testing are to improve the quality of education by tying performance to funding and increasing instruction of the core academic subjects; however, critics believe that states can create their own tests to make their students look like they are reaching higher standards than they really are. Supporters also argue that while grades given by teachers can be subjective and bias, the standardized testing is the same for every participant. It also discusses specific high school standardized tests. Modern high school students must take standardized tests such as the SAT, ACT, and AP exams to apply for colleges.