Young (2009) stresses that within society there are two contrasting views about the aim and value of education in society today. Firstly, one view of education is seen as ‘education as outcomes’. Education as outcomes is whereby the role of education is to provide students with the necessary tools to prepare for tests and examinations. Thus, the view of education is that both the school and child see education as a way of obtaining the grades and not developing the individual. Secondly, the other view of education is to provide the student with specialist knowledge. Young (2009) advocates that the role of schools today should be to provide knowledge more specifically specialised knowledge that they cannot acquire at home. Thus, this idea suggests …show more content…
In addition, when speaking to members of the senior leadership team they heavily emphasised how extremely high achieving the school was. The aim of the school in obtaining the grades can also be in the school prospectus whereby the first sentence is a school of ‘exceptional quality for the local community delivering outstanding examination results year –on-year’. Thus, highlighting that the school specifically evaluated the success of the school in relation to the exam results that they achieved. This can be seen more specifically, in relation to the A level prospectus where they highlighted that the ‘school is in the top 5 percentage of sixth forms in England and 45% of students gained a place at a Russel group university and 12 in total gained a place at Oxford or Cambridge’. Thereby, it can be suggested that through the A level prospectus the school clearly highlights the success of the school in providing the students with the necessary results to go to a good university. In addition, it can be noted that the main reason that students pick this sixth form is that it provides them with the necessary resources and teaching to provide them with the platform of going to a good university. Thus, the sixth form is seen a providing them with the results necessary to allow them to …show more content…
Ball (2010) goes further to explain why only 7% may only attribute to the schools. For instance, many parents who are middle class have the opportunity to purchase a variety of different resources to allow their children to have the edge over working-class children. Ball (2010) notes that many of the parents use a mixture of both private and state resources for their children such as tutors. Thus, these parents allow their children to have an advantage over children who are from working class backgrounds. Therefore, it may be suggested that it is instead the school’s role to provide those students who are from a working-class background to develop the particular skills and resources that they lack in comparison to their more affluent counterparts. In my first placement school, the school’s main target for the year was to approve attainment with pupil premium students. In order to improve attainment, a wide variety of strategies implemented were to develop the student such as being involved in trips, school responsibilities and pupil premium students prioritised for intervention. In addition, the school general provided surgeries where students could go to ask teachers for help. Therefore, developing both the individual and getting the grades are important for the
For example, “the wealthiest 10 percent of U.S. school districts spend nearly 10 times more than the poorest 10 percent, and spending ratios of 3 to 1 are common within states” (Darling-Hammond). In wealthier, suburban areas, most students have the resources available to benefit their educational needs, including; projectors, computers, and calculators. In contrast, “at MacKenzie High School in Detroit, word processing courses are taught without word processors because the school cannot afford them” (Darling-Hammond). For students coming out of lower income communities, it is more difficult for them to attend college, or excel because of the lack of academic preparation. Now not only are many Americans not getting a good education, but as a
In the article, “Savage Inequalities: Children in U.S. Schools”, by Jonathan Kozol, discusses the inequalities that exist in class differences. Money is spent more in wealthy areas than in the poor or low class areas. The schools located in the wealthy areas are funded more and receive more supplies and better teachers. The schools in the not-so-wealthy areas do not have the best teachers and they need better teachers than the students in the wealthy areas. Kozol displays how schools are still segregated as they were in the past.
These students don’t get equal opportunities as those students attending elite schools. Authors Toni Cade Bambara and Jonathon Kozol have written vivid examples on how working class students have been impacted by segregation in school. Working class schools
Being in front of this challenge students try to work harder in order to succeed. In the article, Sherry uses pieces of evidence from her personal experience and examples to support her thesis. Also, her article is well-organized, and Sherry uses an academic language. However, Sherry do not consider many aspects that might affect students. She gives to much importance the example that she gives with her son.
From her investigation, she discovers that “low-income children growing up in states that have greater income inequality are dropping out of high school at higher rates than are children living in states with less income inequality” (Kennedy). Given that the wealth gap is constantly growing, many people in the lower and middle class will struggle to climb the ladder to wealth. Many students that struggle economically would drop out of school if they “perceive a lower benefit to remaining in school–even if they aren’t struggling academically” (Kennedy). This is horrible for those who study well in school, yet they have to drop out since their family is in need of financial assistance. Students are not at fault of this since they cannot choose where they grow up.
Schools servicing low income students are being shortchanged districts disproportionately distribute funds. According to a report from the U.S. Department of Education, “The analysis of new data on 2008-09 school level expenditures show that many high-poverty schools receive less than their fair share of state and local funding, leaving students in high-poverty schools with fewer resources than schools attended by their wealthier peers.” Providing more resources and a better education for students in wealthier areas not only increases the achievement gap, but it increases the social status gap in America. While the nation acknowledges that inequality is an issue, proper action is not being taken. Until this issue is seriously addressed and action is taken, and poorer schools are provided the necessary tools to succeed, the public school system in America will not have the opportunity to produced skilled
Within the reading of chapter four of Our Kids by Robert Putnam one key point of his argument is that it really matters where kids attend school and who they are attending school with. The overall growing class gap is extremely evident within the American school system. However, schools are not responsible for the creation of the opportunity gap because the gap already exists before schools are put into the picture. While this may be true, the schools that kids from affluent families are attending are significantly different than schools that children from poorer families are attending. This could be a product of the fact that affluent and poor families are usually not living in the same areas.
I was amazed to read that in the affluent school, some of the children mention they will rather not be rich. Rich meant that they could not work and they will rather work since they liked working. In the executive school, I was bothered by the comment that a teacher stated. A teacher associated low-income children with discipline problems. I think that teacher generalized an observation he
Rationale From observation majority of the students are faced with social, personal and academic challenges. They are at the stage Identity
Despite the contrasting environment, private school students are no different than public school students. In an online manifesto, If You Send Your Kid to Private school you are bad, Allison Benedikt, an executive editor states, “But many others go private for religious reasons, or because their kids have behavioral or learning issues, or simply because the public school in their district is not so hot”. This proves that private schools are not filled with angels, but rather kids who have behavioral issues and need that extra help. In senior writer and editor John S Kiernan’s, online article, Private Schools vs. Public Schools - Experts Weigh In, Patrick J. Wolf, Ph.D, proclaims, “Private schools also are becoming more diverse, as their enrollments increasingly include minority and low-income students”. Similar to a public school, private schooling have their low, medium and upper class students.
Richard Daley, the Chicago mayor, and Michelle Rhee, a school chancellor, both agree that these programs (meaning school paying students) “level the playing field” for low-income kids, since middle-and upper-class families are able to offer their kids cash incentives for academic achievement. This means that paying students helps the low-income students have enough money to support their education and to be almost at the same level as the upper-class kids with families who can support their school life. Furthermore, paying students could also help gain the low-income students’ attention. This reward helps them resist getting into gangs or committing crimes because of their need for money. The result of students getting paid is that they will enjoy school more and engage in the activities with enthusiasm.
Education plays a crucial role in our life. Education is a part of our life that we can 't ignore. To have a better future, every one of us desires the quality education that can give us a beautiful and happy life. As a part of this, we write competitive exams to pursue our favorite courses in our dream colleges. The ways to reach this objective may differ but there is one thing common for every aspirant.
Teaching philosophy is described by Sadker and Sadker as, “Behind every school and every teacher is a set of related beliefs - a philosophy of education – that influences what and how students are taught. A philosophy of education represents answers to questions about the purpose of schooling, a teacher’s role and what should be taught and by what methods.” (Teacher, Schools and Society. 2005). With this definition in consideration, my teaching philosophy is “I believe that children learn best when they are given the chance to choose, discuss and explore what they want to learn, when they want to learn and how they want to learn.
The purpose of education is to create the “catalyst”, - the interest, the imagination, the self-confidence, the enthusiasm for further knowledge that helps a person grow beyond what they believe they can be. Education should help develop skills and knowledge, so students can be productive members of society. The more knowledge you have, the more opportunities you have in life. I think back to my childhood and the teachers that made an impact in my life. I want to be that catalyst for students.
Malcolm X once said “Education is our passport to the future, for tomorrow belongs to the people who prepared for it today.” In the western world education plays a vital role in shaping our future; it determines if we will survive or fail in the world we created for ourselves. Our world is constantly changing and it requires a society that is well versed in understanding the problems deriving from cultural differences and tolerance of one another’s beliefs and perceptions. With the power of education we are able to deal with the problems of economic, government, religion and culture differences.