Defining ethical: This relates to moral principles or knowledge with dealing with a certain situation. Moral relativism and the self interest theory will be used. And the WOK I will be using is emotion. Primary Knowledge Claim: Seeing that there is a big number of people accepting that it is acceptable to test on animals I think: I think it is ethically wrong to have animals being experimented for the betterment. 25 million animals are experimented on for biomedical researches, science education (dissecting heart, where animals are dead) and cosmetics (for mascaras and liquid liners), every year in the US.
Most diseases can be helped or cured. The methods of testing are unethical or give suspect at best. People did not name their kid to keep from being attached. They did that because he / she could of died of a whooping cough. Animal testing saves more lives than it harms.
Therefore, without animal testing, many of these would never reach the market (PETA, 2012). There is also the argument that we need to observe how products work in the complex interactions of cells, tissues and organs in living animals (PETA, 2012). It can also be argued that many medical students use animals in their own research to learn about the human body before they can become qualified. In this case, animals are already being used to save lives (Orlans, 1993). A final argument is that we already eat meat, which causes animals to suffer and lives to be lost.
Mistreating animals as if one does not care for them is the same as mistreating humans. By mistreating poor doubtless animals it affects them and can sometimes lead into suffering stress. If humans are able to protect each other from harm, then why cannot animals do the same thing by having rights? This question is usefully asked for those who try to protect the rights of animals. In the article Of Primates and Personhood the author Ed Yong, a science journalist, contends, “I feel we should extend rights to a wide range of nonhuman animals… ‘all creatures that can feel pain should have a basic moral status’” (5).
Cases like this made it necessary to find alternative methods to animal testing. Technology is advancing, and the need for animal testing has vanished. There are several alternate methods that are much more effective than using rats or monkeys, not to mention cheaper. Studying cell structures in a petri-dish, micro-dosing, artificial human skin, and computer models have all done away with the need for animal testing. These methods have proved to be more successful, due to the fact that actual human cells are used rather than that of a difference species.
Once you understand the facts about animal testing you to will feel bad for these furry little guys and want to stop this abuse. Studies have shown that 92 out of 100 tests on animals for our products don’t even pass through humans. This evidence shows that animal testing is not an effective way to test our products. Another test was done with 1,000 potential stroke products, those that showed up successful in animals (10%) were
The practice has granted a new life to hopelessly ill patients, modified medicines and made the surgeries fruitfully creative. New alternatives to this practice are in making, but considering the rate at which doctors are fully developing them, the society is still years away from bringing up something that can totally eradicate the traditional animal experimentation. Just like every other scientific practices, animal experimentation, too, becomes a success only after many trials and errors, causing a loss of few innocent animal lives. However, those numbers do not seem as a burning concern when compared to other industries that depend on animals. According to statistics, food animals kill 56 billion animals in the USA which largely differed from the 25 million of animal experimentation (Laws and Regulations).
90% agreed that animal testing was absolutely “essential”. (http://animal-testing.procon.org/) Many say that animals are the most similar to humans. Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans and mice share 98% of their genetics with humans. This makes scientists believe that humans and animals share the same diseases and same organ function. (http://animal-testing.procon.org/) Testing on animals can give a false information and can give misleading diagnosis.
Seeing what animal testing has done for mankind is a major factor in this paper because it has done wonders for us in the medical field, but the cost has been equal and has hurt many. So is it worth the pain or not? While looking at how animal testing has done a lot for us in the medical field people need to look at what the cost has been to achieve these. Many animals have been totured and even killed which in many peoples mind is wrong. Thousands on animals have been killed for our personal use and they had no say in what could happen to them.
Later tests on pregnant mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters did not result in birth defects unless the drug was administered at extremely high doses. Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market. It should stop because if we keep killing animals millions a year after awhile they will start becoming extinct. Some people might argue that god gave us animals to have to eat and use for purposes on earth like testing; but others will saying we are also here and what's the difference between us and animals. During animal-testing they hurt and often torture the animals and what’s really sad is that most people also have their own pets they go to everyday but they work all day killing animals the same to theirs.
The human population may even go down if they are used for testing. This would lead to many problems in the economy on top of the price to pay for human testing. Without animal testing, not only would people with diseases suffer, but the entire world could suffer, proving the presented point that the benefits of animal testing outweigh the drawbacks. Although opponents argue that the drawbacks of animal testing outweigh the benefits because animal testing is cruel, in actuality, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks because it saves human lives and is an affordable
As many as 800 animals are sometimes tested, experts note, before a drug is determined to be safe enough to proceed to a clinical trial (“Animal Testing” 2). While some will argue that these tests are necessary, the reality is, it is cruel and inhumane to experiment
Animals are great and make our lives better but when they are suffering and all we can do is extend their pain for a few months and pay thousands of dollars it just isn’t worth it. Americans nowadays spend money on tons of things that aren’t worth it, but spending thousands of dollars on dying animals is ridiculous. Furthermore, people even treat their animals as family like for example “Eighty-Three Percent refer to themselves to as their parents pet’s mom or dad” (The Last Meow). As a former pet owner I can say that it is ridiculous how people consider animals as their family and use that to justify spending thousands of dollars to keep them for a few months longer. No animal deserves to suffer and be in agony just because you want to cuddle up with them for a little while longer.
Secondly, the anatomy of an animal is very similar to a human, which more than often leads to better results. Lastly, animals are much easier to handle than humans because they are more docile. There have been many arguments stating that animal experimentation is unethical due to fact that animals can suffer through a lot of pain and abuse during these experiments, but if one were to look at the positives, it is clear that the pros outweigh the
Although the idea of testing with animals may sound horrible, animal testing is extremely necessary to keep developing new medicines, and treatments. The benefits of animal testing outweigh the cons of hurting animals for our own wellbeing. These benefits include, many long found treatments and cures that has helped many people throughout the years. Animal testing is also the only way that scientists can properly test on. And lastly, whether many people believe it or not it also benefits animals as well.