ipl-logo

Were The Barbarians Dbq Analysis

537 Words3 Pages

How Barbaric were the Barbarians? The Mongols were a barbaric peoples that reigned with cruelty. They displayed their barbaric tendencies showed through in their invasion and destruction of Nishapur, Persia, their methods of execution, and their rules. Throughout all these events and topics, the Mongols show an extreme level of cruelty, shown by no other before them. During their invasion in Nishapur, Persia, they killed many and left the city in a pile of rubble. Before the Mongols were able to get into the city, the people of Nishapur put up a fight (Document 4). They lined the wall with three thousand crossbows and had other lines of defense including hundreds of mangonels and ballistas (Document 4). They tried their best to hold off the army of Mongols, but they weren’t able to. The Mongols got to the wall and wasted no time to get into the city. Once they were in, they drove all of the people out on the the plains to be executed (Document 4). They raided the town so nothing remained. Not even dogs and cats were allowed to live (Document 4). The people on the plains were later killed by decapitation and piled up. The total destruction of the city of Nishapur and its inhabitants shows that they had no mercy on those whom they killed and didn’t blink an eye at the idea of flattening a town so it no longer remained standing. An act to this magnitude shows how barbaric the barbarians actually were. …show more content…

They had many other methods as well. One method they used was burying people alive (Document 5). The Mongols buried just the prisoners’ heads under the earth so they couldn’t breathe, but they could watch them struggle. Another way was tying a the prisoner to a tree to act like a target (Document 5). Once he or she was fastened securely, the Mongolian army shot arrows at them until they killed them (Document 5). These methods of murder further display how cruel the Mongols

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of Mongols

    609 Words  | 3 Pages

    by vizmike in November 19, 2013 Despite the fact the Mongols frequently used torture and inhumane battle tactics during war, these definitions shows that the mongols were civilized in the times that they were not in war. If people surrendered or were subdued without resistance the mongols exacted tribute, such as taxes or men for war, but generally left the inhabitants alone because their had more joy to spread. (Chapter 14-15 in world history textbook in the library.) To sum it up the mongols were generally peaceful and prosperous but just like any conquest they had to killed a few to get there such as the roman rule or the Han Dynasty

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Mongols

    884 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Mongols were really good at destruction and killing people with their big army’s and ways of conquering. The Mongols should be remembered for destruction because they conquered cities and did not care about the state of the city afterward this claim will be supported by the following three pieces of

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Mongols

    710 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was correct when he says that they were very skillful and they knew what to do when raiding. But I feel like he could have expanded on the fact that they would raid on other people/ groups. But they would also spend time on their own group and people. A invasion that the Mongols had done that really caught my attention was the conquest of Baghdad. I learned that that specific battle was their most destructive and famous conquest that they have done.

    Read More

  • Genghis Khan Research Paper

    444 Words  | 2 Pages

    Genghis Khan and his descendants were cruel, bloodthirsty, and ruthless people, but that does not mean that they were uncivilized. The Mongols did kill and conquer millions of people and promoted senseless destruction ,but while they did that they were at war. At war there is no rules and there is no such thing as uncivilized. At war people do what they need to do to be victorious. At war, people get killed and towns get destroyed.

    Read More

  • Mongols Being Barbaric Dbq Essay

    468 Words  | 2 Pages

    Being savagely cruel and exceedingly brutal is called being barbaric. In the 13th century, Mongols had experienced many places around the Silkroad. Like the following Mongolia, China, and Persia. Mongols originate from Mongolia from there they expand their territory outward. Which leads to the following statement the Mongols were simply looking for wealth not to just be savage to the neighboring civilizations.

    Read More

  • Mongol Empire Dbq Essay

    986 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is evident that the Mongols were a very organized and civilized

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Mongols And Aztec Empires

    928 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Tepanec leader, Maxlatzin, realized that the Aztecs were growing too strong under his protection, therefore sought to reduce their power. But the Aztecs decided to fight and resist, crushing the Tepanec. Mongols were referred to as brutal and ruthless fighters. They were vagrants, continually trying to find a territory to occupy. Many areas the Mongols conquered did not have the resources ruthless Mongols possessed.

    Read More

  • Dbq The Mongols Dbq: How Barbaric Were The Barbarians

    987 Words  | 4 Pages

    DBQ: The Mongols: How Barbaric were the “Barbarians”? Throughout history, the term “barbarian” has been used to refer to groups of “uncivilized” people with savage and evil qualities. What it essentially means is foreigners. A specific group of people called “barbaric” are the Mongols, a small tribe from central asian grasslands who during the 13th century, conquered much of the known world.

    Read More

  • The Negative Influence Of The Mongols

    376 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mongol armies tore through most of the ancient world throughout the 13th century. Pillaging and plundering every nation in their path, the Mongols left an impressive wake of destruction and death. The Mongols shook the world with the impact of their conquests, but not of their influence was negative. Overall the Mongols brought much needed change in politics and commerce to both China and the Middle East.

    Read More

  • Mongol Dbq Analysis

    304 Words  | 2 Pages

    How barbaric were the Mongols? There’s no evidence that specifically leans to one side. During the 13th century started the Mongols era, it later ended in 1502. How should we make of the Mongols? “In a word, unless they retreat in a body, all who take flight are put to death.”

    Read More

  • Genghis Khan Dbq Essay

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    More specifically, my reason were as follows: their treatment of many people in the regions that they conquered, destruction of property, and caused much devastation across the lands. Upon conquering those in foreign lands, the Mongols treated the people without dignity or respect of any kind. It seemed that they had a disregard for human life with the people were alien to them and discriminated against them whilst in the peoples’ native land. Once conquered the peoples’ lifestyles were ripped from them, even including the elites.

    Read More

  • How Did The Mongols Affect Europe

    2071 Words  | 9 Pages

    The Mongol Empire had created a single economic and cultural world system. In 13 century, the the Mongols had seized nearly the whole Eastern Europe, including now Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary. Scholars regard the Mongol conquest as one of the most deadliest invasions in human history. The Mongols also called the Tatars, which means Hell in Roman. Historian Brian Landers stated in his book that "The Mongols brought terror to Europe on a scale not seen again until the twentieth century."

    Read More

  • Were The Mongols Good Or Bad

    350 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Mongols Intro The Mongols have made a negative impact to all of us in one way or another. Some ways worse than others. Some of the things Genghis Khan has done may be cruel and wrong, but was what he had to do to be a great leader. The Mongolians ruled from 1260 to 1368 C.E, they were located in Mongolia, in the Northern China area.

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay On The Mongols

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    The term “barbaric” refers to being cruel and brutal. The fact that the mongols killed millions of people during their journey cannot be ignored, however the second part of the definition cannot be either. As stated by the Oxford Living Dictionaries, the term barbaric also refers to being primitive and unsophisticated, which is not the case at all. Document A gives the reader a sense of how much land and impact the mongols really had by comparing them to more relevant leaders of the theme.

    Read More

  • Effects Of Happiness

    782 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thus, the Mongols were extremely disappointed when their empire collapsed. They fell apart because they had too much land to govern and had no clue how to govern such a vast amount of land. Plus, their strong leaders had passed away, leaving them with no leader, just a mindset that they needed more land. This lead them to be extremely disappointed that they didn't accomplish what they set out to do. However, if they were satisfied with

    Read More

More about Were The Barbarians Dbq Analysis

Open Document