ipl-logo

Why Do People Convicted When They Only Have Circumstantial Evidence

606 Words3 Pages

Why are people always convicted on something they only have circumstantial evidence on? I believe that there is many more ways for a jury to find out if a person is guilty or not and circumstantial evidence is one of the main things they use. Most of the time people get blamed for something they didn’t do and they don’t even have all the evidence to prove that one is guilty. So then they end up going to jail for a crime they did not commit. I don’t believe a person should be convicted of a crime based only on circumstantial evidence because I don’t think it’s fair for the victim. The victim might not have all the evidence of what happened to them but they know that it really happened or maybe there isn’t any witnesses but the victim.
For example, in Los Angeles on January 18, 1991 a man named Donald Sarpy who was putting his …show more content…

He was a very talented football player who had just accepted a four-year scholarship to play football in the University of Southern California. He had gone out of class to use the telephone and he saw Wanetta Gibson a girl he knew since middle school. They got into an elevator and went to a secluded area of the school that was known as the “makeout” spot. When they went back to their classes Wanettas teacher criticized her for taking long. So she passed a note to her friend saying she had gotten raped by Banks and that she was no longer a virgin. They then reported what happened, later on that night Banks was arrested. On January 3, 2002 they charged Banks with two counts of forcible rape and one count of sodomy with a special circumstance of kidnapping. Banks was facing a potential prison term of 41 years to life, he pleaded no contest on July 8,2003. He was then only sentenced to 6 years. In 2006 Banks filed a petition on how there was no biological evidence that he had raped her. The petition was denied as

Show More
Related

  • Kennedy Castro Case Study

    741 Words  | 3 Pages

    On May 8, he was charged with four counts of kidnapping and three counts of rape. And these charges carry prison sentences of 10 years to life in the state of Ohio. On May 9, his very first court attendance, where his bail was set at $2 million per kidnapping charge which meant a total of $8 million. Other charges were stated to be awaiting, including aggravated murder (for the forceful miscarriages), attempted murder, assault, a charge for each suspected case of rape, and a kidnapping charge for each day each captive was supposedly held.

    Read More

  • Julie Rea Biased Trial

    721 Words  | 3 Pages

    Innocent until proven guilty is a phrase the United States justice system says we abide by but in many cases this seems to falter from true. Due to various factors such as tunnel vision, faulty forensics, false confessions, improper identification, missing evidence and the list could go on; all of these reasons can lead to a biased trial and ultimately lead to a wrongful conviction. Julie Rea was a single mom convicted of the murder of her ten year old son Joel Kirkpatrick on October 13th, 1997. This twenty-eight year old mom and her son lived in a rural area in Lawrence, Illinois that was referred to as a quaint little town that very rarely saw any crime so when the news of sweet little Joel Kirkpatrick being murdered got out it sent the

    Read More

  • Comparison Of The Glen Ridge Rape And Glen Ridge Rape

    1154 Words  | 5 Pages

    The other victim is a young girl whose name was not given, and she was raped at a high school party after getting highly intoxicated. Many witnesses say that they saw her passed out, unable to walk, and even called her a mess during the time. There were various pictures and videos of her posted that night where the statements of the witnesses were confirmed (Strasser,2013). Both victims were taken advantage of and thankfully their rapists were both convicted. The first case was a little more difficult because there’s always going to be an issue with disability and consent.

    Read More

  • Reformer's Unanimous Case Study

    454 Words  | 2 Pages

    He took her to his cabin in Michigan where intimate pictures were taken of the two of them together. He told the young girl that she was a gift from God and that it was Christ’s desire for them to be together. In 2012, he took a plea deal and pled guilty to one felony count of criminal sexual assault. He was sentenced to serve 12 years in jail. After that, he was required to be under supervised release for five years.

    Read More

  • Domestic Abuse In Tennessee Williams A Streetcar Named Desire

    548 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, an even bigger problem is the fact that the victims almost never get justice. Approximately half of rape kits are either lost or never tested to help find and prosecute the criminals. Furthermore, the few rapists that are ever found guilty get less sentencing than people who committed petty crimes. The worst of all is when loved ones do not even believe in the victim’s story. This was the case between Stella and Blanche when Stella said “I couldn’t believe her story and go on living with Stanley.

    Read More

  • Alex's Lying: A Short Story

    161 Words  | 1 Pages

    Alex, sixteen, has just started in a boy 's school when he did not save a friend from drowning in the river on the campus. They fear the consequences if they reveal the truth, Alex and his friend Glen, who also witnessed the accident, decided not to lie. Guilty, Alex hid in the library, told him the story in the magazine that he had a copy of Dick. But the boys are not the only one in the river that day. In their panic.

    Read More

  • Edgar Allan Poe's A Cask Of Amontillado

    1709 Words  | 7 Pages

    In Edgar Allan Poe’s “ A Cask Of Amontillado” the, quite possibly, insane protagonist, Montresor, grisly murders his antagonist, Fortunato. Montresor alluded, at the end of the vengeful tale, that he never faced any repercussions for the ghastly crime he committed. Many homicidal criminals aspire to escape all possible consequences of their brutal crimes. The rate at which these harsh murders are solved today, is far less than the rate at which they were solved several years ago. Murder clearance rates might be going down because culprits of manslaughter have changed their devious methods of the past.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Salem Witch Trials And The American Criminal Justice System

    478 Words  | 2 Pages

    Today, modern standards require the burden of proof be brought forth by the plaintiff, or prosecution in criminal cases. This means that the accused no longer has to prove they did not commit the crime, but the prosecution has to prove that all the evidence proves the accused did in fact commit the crime in question. Circumstantial evidence is not enough, but physical evidence, or forensic evidence is now required in modern courts for a conviction. Additionally, the modern standard when considering evidence, and for conviction is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

    Read More

  • Harold Storms: A Short Story

    615 Words  | 3 Pages

    " The older man 's head had shot up, but instead of answering, he began stroking harder. Without a word, Zoe crossed the room and hiked her skirt up, straddling his lap. She pushed her panties aside and with one hand on his shoulder and looking into his eyes, she lowered herself onto his turgid cock. Her velvet-lined pussy tightly squeezed his length, and they fucked hard and fast. Moments later, his load spent in her young pussy, she left the office and finished cleaning the

    Read More

  • Why Is Oj Simpson Innocent

    1610 Words  | 7 Pages

    OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Wrongful Conviction

    949 Words  | 4 Pages

    “ Those who have been exonerated each spent an average of 14 years in prison, and some even up to 35 or more years...but they also usually have to wait a few more years if and before they are exonerated (Innocence Project).” This Explains that to be able to become free you have to still be in for years . The perpetrators and or suspects who were caught, “148: True suspects and/or perpetrators identified. Those actual perpetrators went on to be convicted of 146 additional violent crimes, including 77 sexual assaults, 34 murders, and 35 other violent crimes while the innocent sat behind bars for their earlier offenses(Innocence Project).” DNA statistics, and no evidence that showed he

    Read More

  • Direct Vs Circumstantial Evidence Essay

    1522 Words  | 7 Pages

    Lack of better evidence than acts and statements including that of co-conspirators in pursuance of the conspiracy requires appreciation of circumstantial evidence following the well established rule in criminal jurisprudence that circumstantial evidence can be reasonably made the basis of an accused person's conviction if it is of such a character that it is wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and is consistent only with his guilt... But in applying this principle, it is necessary to distinguish between facts which may be called primary or basic on the one hand and inference of facts to be drawn from them on the other... When it is held that a certain fact is proved, the question arises whether that fact leads to the inference of guilt of the accused person or not, and in dealing with this aspect of the problem the doctrine of benefit of doubt would apply and an inference of guilt can be drawn only if the proved fact is wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and is consistent only with his

    Read More

  • Kelley Character Analysis

    648 Words  | 3 Pages

    One day, Kelley was visiting her home town and she bumped into one of the rudest person she knew; Jared. Jared was one of the popular athletes that graduated with Kelley. He always bullied her because she was so kind. While in the grocery store, she saw Jared having a hard time trying to control a little boy that was running wild. She saw the little boy stray away from Jared and run out the doors towards the street.

    Read More

  • Essay On Circumstantial Evidence

    769 Words  | 4 Pages

    The law is well settled that each and every incriminating circumstance is required to be clearly established with supporting evidences and also the chain of events should be complete in such a manner that the only conclusion which could be drawn is guilt of the accused and no other hypothesis against the guilt is possible. The Supreme court also didn’t hesitate in giving death sentence to the murderer only because the case relied on circumstantial evidence. The general rule is that it is admissible in a court of law but they are required to be cautious when a case solely relies on circumstantial evidence. All the facts should be closely examined and it must be looked at

    Read More

  • Convicted People Without Evidence

    512 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the court of law a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, you cannot convict someone without the proper evidence and a court to back up the evidence against the person being accused. In a court a judge or jury will decide whether the person should be convicted innocent or guilty based on the evidence. If proven guilty they can be sentenced to jail, life sentence, or in a serious case sentenced to death. Everyone has their rights and they cannot be violated without the proper evidence to be convicted. I am all forward with this statement, it would be horrid if they convicted people based on appearance, and accusations rather than based on evidence!

    Read More

More about Why Do People Convicted When They Only Have Circumstantial Evidence

Open Document