Should pit bulls be banned? Pit bulls should not get banned. Pit bulls are like any other dog. Several people are more aggressive than pit bulls. Think about it this way, some humans are awful and some humans are great. It works the same way for pit bulls, some are good and some are bad. Pitbulls should not get prohibited. The first reason is that pit bulls are not the only dogs that are vicious or bite. The the second reason is that the BSL does not make communities safer. First off, pit bulls are not the only dogs that are vicious or bite.“There are about 78 million dogs in the United States, meaning less than 17% of dogs bite less than 1.4% and kill less than 0.00001% of the US population.” states Lindsy Marchello, Brian Hare, Vannessa Woods, and United States Burau. It is important to know this because discrimination should not happen against dogs just because they are at the top of the list for being brutal. People need to remember that not all of them are like that. Not all pit bulls are mean. If they are being vile to humans, they need to remember that they might be attacking them because they feel threatened by them. …show more content…
What is BSL? BSL targets specific dog breeds and places stricter regulations on these dogs or even makes ownership of them illegal. “In 1990 when pit bulls were banned in Winnipeg, Canada, Rottweiler bites immediately increased. When the city changed the law in 2000 to be breed-neutral, all dog bites decreased” states the ASPCA. So, this means that pit bulls are not the only dog that bites. After banning them several other dogs started biting more. And even after they let humans own them all dog bites decreased. It is important that people do not stereotype pit bulls. This paragraph helped prove the overall claim of this paragraph because pit bulls are not the only dog that bites a
This shows how they are not great dogs and how aggressive they are. (Paragraph 4). People have noticed pit bulls are aggressive and can injure many people.
Pit bulls are often portrayed as violent in the media. Others think pit-bull shouldn't be banned because Studies show that Pit Bulls are not even in the top five most aggressive dog breed. The most aggressive dog breed is actually a little bitty wiener dog. Although Pit bulls are sometimes bred to kill, they are really fun loving dogs and will make you happy, and therefore Pit Bulls should be able to be kept as pets. It is essential that people understand that Pit-Bulls, most of the time, are great lovable dogs and even heroes!
In conclusion, pit bulls aren't such dangerous dogs after all. Pit bulls have somewhat of a damage to history. There's reasons behind that though so people can judge pit bulls for being the "bully breed" but they're really not. We can fix the way people think by showing them how pit bulls can be "mean"and how they
KayLee McKee 2 Feb.2023 ELA 1 Argumentative essay Should pit bulls be banned? Did you know that according to facts.net that pit bulls are #2 in the most affectionate breeds following the golden retriever? 23% percent of the American population wants to ban what the Americans call an "Unruly and nasty beast.”
In the 1980’s, the targeted breed was the Rottweiler, and from the 1990’s to now, the Pitbull has been the targeted breed. A major factor that has influenced BSL, is the popularity of dog fighting. The history of the Pitbull explains why they are such a wanted breed for dog fighting. At their origin they were bred to participate in bull fighting or bear baiting.
Pitbulls are being unfairly banned because of what people say about their breed. They should get the same chance as any other in the world. they shouldn't be judged by their name. Here’s why, they will not snap if they are not abused and neglected. there is no evidence that banning them is going to make communities safer.
There is no evidence that pitbull bans make communities safer. “In 1990, Winnipeg,Canada, pitbulls were banned, which actually increased the number of dog bites, however rottweiler bites went up immediately.” In 2000 when they changed this law, all dog bites decreased. This proves that the pitbulls were not actually the ones that were attacking,
Before getting into persuading readers; they should know why pit bull breeds get such a bad rap, as well as where the breed came from. Today’s pit bull is a descendant of the original English bull -baiting dog (Position). These dogs were bred to bite and hold bulls, bears, and other larger animals around the face and
Now people want to ban the all Pit Bull mixes or any dog that could be mistaken for a Pit Bull. But by using breed specific legislation would be wrong because you would be taking innocent dogs away from their loving family. So I say Pit bulls should not be banned for their behavior when they are trained to be aggressive and short tempered. The American Pit Bull Terrier is well known for superior intelligence,strength and loyalty. in recent years this breed has been mis advertised as violent and vicious.
I think pitbulls should not be banned because they are safe, protectors and are not born violent. My first reason is that pitbulls are not born to rip other dogs or Humans. They are being trained to fight by humans who want to make an entertainment out of them or to profit from them. Some pit bulls were selected and bred for their strong ability to fight well against other dogs.
From a movie it was stated “Good dragons under control of bad people do bad things” (Time). That is the same thing for pit bulls they just need to be trained the right way. Being trained properly is what causes them to be so great with children (Melanie). People say that “pain and fear” are the two main causes of pit bulls attacking and biting (Time). Some have heard of pit bulls that are “as gentle as lambs” and that just shows how easy they would be to work with.
Pitbulls give benefits to many people of different kinds such as”Therapy and service dogs, agility champions, search & rescue dogs, and even military heroes.” Even though harsh stereotypes seek pitbulls out to be Dangerous and aggressive they can be used for many important tasks that help people and our society. All in all it is clear that pitbulls have been unfairly treated. Pitbull bans are unfair because the dogs are not as aggressive as everyone claims they are.
More than likely the people that get this type of dog would just train a different breed of dog such as german shepherds to do the same thing therefore, “banning pit bulls would make no progress”. http://www.opposingviews.com/i/should-pit-bulls-be-banned. “If it was determined that pit bulls were 5 times more likely to attack than any other dogs, that could mean that 5 out of 1 million pit bulls will attack in their lifetime instead of 1 out of 1 million. The point is the evidence that shows pit bulls are more likely to attack than other dogs is misinterpreted to mean that they are likely to attack”. http://www.opposingviews.com/i/should-pit-bulls-be-banned.
Some pit bulls are penurious. There have been many pit bull attacks in the past and the present. One such attack happened to Justin Clinton. He was a ten year old boy who was mauled to death by two pit bulls. The mother of the child wants there to be a law called Justin 's law.
But so are every breed. Pitbulls aren’t even at the top of the list for most likely to bite. Pomeranians are, but Pomeranians aren’t thought to be aggressive or scary because of how small they are, but Pomeranians were bred as guard dogs ("The Truth about Pitbull Aggression.”). Dobermans, Great Dane, and german shepherds are also all breeds who bite more preferentially than pit bulls. A Labrador retriever attacked a woman so badly that she needed a face transplant and there are always one or two deaths caused by huskies every year but no one has tried to ban either of those breeds.