Animal testing has been around for centuries. Early scientists performed experiments on animals to test out certain medicine and surgical procedures before applying them to human patients. Animal testing eventually became a huge controversy in the following years. The ongoing animal testing debate has caused many journalists to write their own point of view on the entire controversy. Journalists such as; Iza Iglesias and Lorna Collier. Iza Iglesias and Lorna Collier both discuss their viewpoints on animal testing and provides evidence to support their argument. In the article, “ 8 million signatures needed in fight against animal testing”, Iglesias argues against animal testing while Collier defends it in her article titled, “Defending animal …show more content…
The use of pathos is definitely shown at the beginning of the article, but not through out. When Iglesias states, “The animals usually end up being put down after a matter of days, or if they keep going, weeks or even years in such horrific conditions”(Iglesias 1), then “As such, in 1989 British brand The Body Shop became the very first international beauty brand to campaign against the practice of animal testing in cosmetics, in partnership with Cruelty Free International”(Iglesias 1), she shifts the main focus of the article. Iglesias discusses different companies fighting against animal testing rather than discussing the negative effects of animal experimentation. The rest of the article consists of quotes from different people. For instance, Iglesias quoted, '"No animal should get tested for the sake or expense of cosmetics especially since we value our own lives. We should also value theirs," Stockinger stated”(Iglesias 1). When Iglesias quotes Vanessa Matsunaga, a brazilian model, throughout the article, she steers the readers farther away from the main purpose of the article . Iglesias restates Matsunaga, “Manila-based Brazilian model Vanessa Matsunaga said that companies should find other alternatives in testing their products without having to harm animals”(Iglesias 1). A brazilian model speaking on using animals for …show more content…
Collier does not start her article by grabbing the reader 's attention, but she soon gets straight to the main idea. Collier mentions how animal experimentation is necessary and beneficial to human beings. Collier states, “This is an important part of animal research because one of the big limitations in human neuroscience and human psychology is that yes, we can image the brain, but we can 't see it at a microscopic level”(Collier 40). The reader will begin to understand how animal research is extremely important when examining human organs. Collier also states, “Rodent brains are made of the same mechanisms as human brains — the same kind of cells, the same kind of neurotransmitters or chemicals”(Collier 40), to give the readers more crucial evidence as to why animal research is necessary. One tends to pay more mind to issues that can possibly affect them in a negative way, Collier does well with capturing the reader 's attention when mentioning human health. In modern day, animal research is seen as cruel and undergoes tons of criticism. Collier covers many animal harm concerns by stating, “When there is potential for pain — for example an experiment that involves surgery — researchers use anesthetics and analgesics”(Collier 40). Collier then comforts ones concern for animal safety by mentioning, “All of our research is supervised by practicing veterinarians who know the state of the art. It 's
Discursive Essay (1st Draft) – Kevin Cho I have detested animal testing ever since I watched a document showing orangutan tortured to death during the animal testing. I was physically and mentally sick when I looked into its eyes. Now, while you are reading this essay, perhaps holding a scrumptious apple pie in your hand, hundreds of, thousands of feeble animals are dying by inhumane animal tests.
“A Question of Ethics” by Jane Goodall and “Animal Research Saves Lives” by Heloisa Sabin presents two sides of the same coin in regards to Animal testing. Thereby, questioning the validity or necessity of animal research and testing today. In “A Question of Ethics” by Goodall she presents a scenery of the living conditions of the animals which are often isolated; posing the ultimate questions of, whether animal research is essential to medical research? Or How many tests are performed only to conform to laws and not out of scientific merit? The Suggestion was made that scientists should explore alternative options, such as testing on cell and tissue cultures.
In his work, Tom Regan establishes the rights of animals used in scientific research. He argues that when animals are used as objects of experiment, they are not respected and their inherent value is not acknowledged. Having inherent value, as defined by Regan, is a state, in which a being is not just a vessel, but a being with a complex mental life. All who have inherent value are to have it equally.
While viewing animal experiments can be conducted both through the prism of the benefits and the disadvantages, this issue served as a powerful reason for discussions in the society and points out the need for
Purpose: To inform the audience about animal testing I. Introduction A. Attention getting device: Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in US laboratories for cosmetic and biomedical research. B. Thesis: I would like to inform you about how animal testing is conducted. C. Credibility: I have read and studied the articles about animal testing. D. Preview: I am going to share with you purposes of animal testing, how animals are used in laboratory tests, and the effectiveness of animal testing.
Smith, Wesley J. "The Grim Good of Animal Research." www.firstthings.com (18 Oct. 2013). Rpt.
Although it can be useful to know the side effects of something before trying it on humans, we don’t consider the effects it can have on the animals, which are often extremely harmful and cruel. Scientists have become progressive in creating alternative methods to these experiments. Now, animal testing is nearly unnecessary because there are alternatives which are more efficient and harmless. The rights of animals is a topic that comes up frequently, but people often turn their cheek the other way when it comes to their possessions being a product of cruelty.
I’m here today to talk about a controversial issue that has been around for a period of time, animal testing. Animal testing using animals in experiments with different chemical substances in everything from medical to cosmetic to determine their safety as well as effectiveness . It’s a problem that has existed since the 3rd and 4th centuries BCE with its merciless methods and painful ways of abusing animals for human demands, but now it’s time for it to stop. Our technology has developed significantly since; therefore, such medieval methods of torturing animals are no longer necessary. Researches have shown that each year, over 100 million animals are tortured and killed in American laboratories alone, including dogs, cats and more; this shows how far out of hand animal testing have gotten.
Animal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs” (Dictionary.com). This experimentation has been practiced since around 500 BCE, and has allowed the human race to discover many things that otherwise would have not been discovered (ProCon). The use of animal testing has increased, due to its many necessary benefits, such as: helping form vaccinations and uncovering new diseases in the specific species being tested on (AALAS). However, many animal activist groups such as, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), have spoken out against the issue. These groups claim animal testing to be “inhumane”
Why Animal Testing is Wrong The human race has greatly benefitted through the use of animals. They have not only been a great form of companionship for people, but have also helped with the success in the world of medicine. For many years, the rights of animals and animal experimentation have been up for debate on whether or not it should be legal. Some may find that animal testing has led to major advancements in the medical world and that it is a small price to pay to save millions of lives, but others believe it is inhumane and that animals should be given the same rights as humans.
Henceforth, as animal testing increased, so did the controversy surrounding it (“Animal testing,” n.d.). Moreover, with the help of animal testing, various treatments and medicines are developed for unconventional diseases. Although animal testing may seem ruthless, animals are used for experimental research that contributes to science if there are no other possible substitutes. Animal testing is a debatable topic that still continues to be one until this time. Animal experimentation should persist because it saves human’s life from diseases, ensures cosmetics’ safety, and improves medical
Animal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’
By the nineteenth century, animal experimentation was more commonly used to receive a better understanding of the “pathology…,disease, progression, …diagnosis and prognosis” (Franco). Millions of lives were saved due to discoveries of “vitamins, hormones, antibiotics, safe blood transfusion, vaccines, insulin, hemodialysis, chemo and radiotherapy for cancer, the eradication of smallpox,… advanced means of diagnostic and new surgical techniques” all of which were all possible because of animal experimentation (Franco). In 1912, an article titled, “Solving Medical Mysteries by Help of Animals” was published in the New York Times (Metz). The author, Metz, was a businessman and politician from New York who used this article to publicly inform society that testing on small animals in research could benefit society in extensive ways. This article described a scene in which animals were segregated into rooms and used as experimental subjects to discover how to stop the spread of epidemics and diseases that were occurring within society (Metz).
Each year in the United States, millions of animals are hurt or killed in the name of science by private institutions, household companies, cosmetics companies, government agencies, and scientific centers. These companies put these animals though harsh and inhumane conditions for testing. Medical testing should not harm the lives of many harmless animals because it is ineffective, irrelevant, and cruel. Animal testing is outdated and ineffective. In the article,”Stop animal testing - it's not just cruel, it's ineffective”, it reads,”There are safer alternatives to animal testing.
Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.