The Chinese government has well understood the damages which the supply of a demerit good such as tobacco can cause to the citizens and the economy in a whole. Smoking brings about what economists will call a market failure. “Market failure occurs when the market is allocatively inefficient, resulting in the over-allocation of resources or under-allocation of resources” (The meaning of market failure - IB Guides). From the article, about a million of Chinese pass away every year due to smoking, not to talk of the ones affected by diseases such as lung cancer amongst other diseases. Equally, when individuals smoke, there are adverse effects on third parties around them. This is a negative externality of consumption. The diagrammatic illustration …show more content…
Smokers over-consume cigarettes by smoking Q1 cigarettes at a price P1 instead of Qe and Pe respectively. Hence, the marginal social cost ends up being greater than the marginal social benefit for these units and the welfare loss is represented by the area shaded in the diagram. This is a market failure.
The Chinese authorities can undertake several actions to reduce or even do away with this market failure and the different actions will have different levels of impact. The Chinese government could simply ban the consumption of Cigarettes in the economy. This banning policy has been applied in certain places such as bars and restaurants. However, being the world’s biggest producer of tobacco, the complete banning of this good everywhere would greatly affect the tobacco industry in the country as there will be a considerable fall in the demand for tobacco products. To reduce the smoking rate, the authorities in Hong Kong have decided to place a Tax on cigarettes (tobacco). This tax obviously increases the cost of production of tobacco and the producers will be obliged to transfer the burden to the consumers of tobacco in the form of
…show more content…
They will do this in an attempt to reduce the demand for cigarettes at the national level. With the nearly 300 million smokers in China, a huge budget is needed to organise such campaigns. Hence the authorities can get some money from the revenues collected from taxes which from the anonymous source from the article would be estimated at 20million Yuan in order to organise successful campaigns. A persistent consumption of smoke is very likely of affect an economy in different ways. In my opinion, while a complete ban on cigarette smoking will not be best way to control smoking in China, they have to strictly implement taxes in the smoking industry. Smoking is very injurious to the health of everyone. So the Chinese government has to eliminate this very intelligently in an attempt to allocate resources optimally for their economy to continue
Bhutan currently is the only country in the world that has completely banned smoking. Since only 1% of the country smoked in the first place, it has not affected the economy too much. The smuggling to illegal cigarettes are very common in the country though. People who did smoke, have moved away or resorted to the black market to settle their craving. Some have resorted to other drugs to get past the absence of tobacco.
“The Filth They Breathe in China,” by Michael Auslin reflects on what is happening to the air and water in China. This article describes the air pollution and why it is happening. It tells us what this is doing to our health and what scientist are saying. China 's air pollution has had great deal of problems and that the united states should step in to help generate better lives.
In the current world, Americans community presides over what’s considered acceptable versus what’s to be evaded. Bearing in mind the massive amount of things that are considered as the atrocious to the American life style, it should be not amazing that one of the most frightening of antagonist is the issue of the smoking. With many factual figures, propaganda and comparison regarding to counsel the public about the devastating effects of the smoking, in the current era smoking is become a cultural taboo. Almost the average American citizen is acquainted with the damaging health effects of the smoking, but still whether or not proscription the cigarette is a levelheaded plan of action is arguable. Is it such a good thought to ban cigarette of which many individuals are habitual?
Even non-smokers are now facing the consequences caused by cigarette smoke. Although cigarettes generate a lot of money for the economy, they have negative effects on people’s bodies and the environment, and should be completely outlawed in America. Smoking cigarettes effects the smoker immediately, and has many negative short-term
Recently, there is a new invention that has become public interest from country’s leader to citizen due to the rise of one device that called e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes or Vape are electronic devices intended to deliver nicotine with flavorings, which up to 7700 different flavors and some other chemicals into vapor. The amount of users of this device has increased in the past couple of years, which contributed $6 billion to the economy in 2015 itself, this is so as it is often portrayed as a healthier substitute for the regular cigarettes though this statement has yet been proven true. The question is: should the government ban the use of e-cigarettes? In my opinion, government should ban the use of e-cigarettes because it is detrimental to health,
Smoking is a choice and no one is forcing that upon people. The public has been well warned about the risks of smoking; therefore, the people smoking are fully aware that their lives are at risk. Tobacco companies should not be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths because once people put the tobacco in their mouths, they are putting there own life at risk themselves, and because as individuals we have a choice on whether or not to smoke cigarette. It 's true that tobacco companies aren 't accountable for why people smoke. Nonetheless, every tobacco product has a warning label on it therefore it 's not the companies responsibility from smoking-related illnesses and deaths.
1.1 Background Indonesia is one of the developing countries that have high levels of consumption and production of cigarette. Variation product and price cigarettes cause Indonesia has become one of the producers and consumers cigarette the largest in the world (Anies, 2006). According to the Director of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise, Frans Rupang, permitting the establishment of a cigarette production is relatively easy. Now we have at least 3,800 cigarette factories, including home-based classes. The amount was the largest in the world (http://bisniskeuangan.kompas.com accessed 25 April 2015).
By enforcing a ban on public smoking we might be able to create a safer environment for the non-smoking population. Enforcing laws that are against public smoking will result in lesser kids to start smoking. In a recent survey, it is found that when kids see other people smoke, they find it fascinating and cool to a certain extent and will try to smoke their first cigarette. Although we know that smoking is harmful the government earns a fare amount of money from the sales of tobacco in the different forms and by putting a ban on public smoking the income would decrease. However is it actually worth getting money out of something we know affects the health negatively and causes illnesses as scary as
The graph illustrates that there are negative externalities of consumption of cigarettes. As indicated, the marginal private benefit is greater than the marginal social benefit as there is a harm to society. The difference between the MPB and MSC is the negative externality. As consumers only consider private benefit, the free market equilibrium will be at P1 and Q1. Thus, cigarettes is over-consumed by q1-q units.
It affects the health of the human beings and also the environment. Despite having all these negative effects, tobacco is of great economic importance as it creates employment for the citizens. The negative effects of tobacco smoking supersede its positive contributions. Therefore, tobacco smoking should be banned. .
Smoking has been a long time habit round the world. However, in the past, smoking cigarette was very popular and known to be a cool recreational drug, and was widely accepted by the community across the world. Today smoking has been less widely accepted and more restricted because of the many health risks that are linked to smoking cigarette. These days, people are well educated and more knowledgeable about the health risks of smoking.
Smoking in public should be prohibited because it’s linked with health problems; lung damage, poor blood flow and pneumonia. Smoking can damage our lungs. The smoke of the cigarette which smokers and non-smokers inhaled, it irritate our lungs that lungs that leads to
Ethics is a complex subject that is very relevant in the globalized world we live in today. It can be said that governments are often faced with “ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest” (Carpenter, Taylor, Erdogan, 2009, page 78). This is because they have to protect the public from the dangers of products and services while at the same time, enjoy the stream of taxes or license fees emanating from their consumption. In this case analysis I will be addressing the arguments for and against banning tobacco advertising in India. The conflict of interest that the government of India had in deciding about this ban and finally I will state my own personal opinion about this matter.
“Sin taxes” are a type of excise tax levied on harmful products such as alcohol or tobacco. One of cigarette taxes’ purposes is to reduce smoking habits. However, what seems like a simple solution to generate revenue for the government and deter a harmful habit has social consequences that cannot be overlooked. Because cigarette taxes are currently regressing society by hurting low-income smokers and encouraging smuggling in the United States, they should either be revoked, or the generated revenue should be used to fund health organizations. The World Health Organization (WHO), a branch of the United Nations concerned with public health, claims that cigarette taxes should be authorized because they prevent smoking related deaths.
Smoking has become a social habit nowadays. When people around are smoking, the person practically feel like he/she should be doing the same. And this is increasing day by day in our country. Smoking tribulates almost every organ of the body. It is the leading cause of more than 443,00 deaths each year.