If we were to fight in World War II, we would be helping out nations. Helping those who are being targeted and those who have their safety being questioned. Many can argue that going into World II against Europe would simply be laying out our graves as the European Army will easily kill all U.S. members, but without putting up an attempt to fight for our freedom, we will not succeed in having a free and united nation in the future. We’d rather not have our independence taken away from us by totalitarian governments, and be dominated by them. Instead a fight should be put up to show that we will do our best to achieve liberty, which is why the United States should have fought in World War
The longer the war went on the more American citizens were wanting to join the war, so people helped push America into the Great War. America would have stayed neutral in WW1 if Germany didn 't test them every point. They really tested the U.S. when they torpedoed the British Passenger ship the Lusitania, which broke international laws called Cruise Rules. Americans didn 't care about the law as much as the 128 Americans who
They both wanted to promote world peace. However, Kennedy’s approach was more aggressive than Eisenhower because he was willing to pay at any price in the name of democratic safety while Eisenhower wanted a well-balanced spending towards nuclear development. For me, Kennedy’s presidential address was more applicable to Santyana’s saying when he was reminding the people of the world not commit the same mistake as other countries had, because if they followed countries led by dictatorship they will also end up being the victim of that tyrannical
“ Give me liberty or give me death”,( Patrick Henry). The most well known speech given by the prestigious Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775 expressing his thoughts and feelings about fighting back against Britain and protecting their beloved country. At this time the British was defeating America terribly which had made Patrick Henry feel as though his freedom was being jeopardized. Patrick Henry’s speech was an attempt to persuade the american citizens not to just sit and do nothing, he wanted to fight back against Britain. Patrick Henry felt as though many of the citizens were not aware of the seriousness of what was happening and that the needed to have a wake up call.
Her will would have been for her country to remain at peace and not enter war for several reasons. One, Davis’s and her classmates education was at stake, and she knew that education would lead to greater success later on in life. Secondly, because the propaganda surrounding them was misleading, and would benefit people outside of the United States, or just a select few inside the US who were pushing towards war for profit, not a defense of liberties. The main point of this letter was that there was support for the war, if there was a reason to fight for one, not just a petty land battle or a scheme for a few men to acquire riches on the backs of other men’s
President Lincoln had to make the best decision for the country, even if he did not satisfy the interests of both groups. Presidents should not appeal to majorities nor minorities, but overall, make the best decision for the country as seen with George Washington, as well as Abraham Lincoln. Each knew what was best in the end and that is what made him a great leader. If the government continues to apply filters of consent, prevent majority factions, and let the president make their own verdicts for the country, we will all be better
There is always another side to the story. Federalist, these people supported the constitution. Though they knew that the constitution wasn’t perfection yet, According to document 3 George Washington state 's ”We have errors to correct… would to God, that wise measures may be taken in time to avert the consequences we have but too much reason to apprehend”. George was sure that the constitution wasn’t perfect but that in this time of need they need something like it. They need a strong government, to win over the people who won’t support over fear of loss of natural laws, like mentioned in document 1 “Let us look and behold the distress which prevail in every part of our country… View these things, fellow citizens, and then say we do not require a new, a protection, and efficient federal government if you can” this document was quoted from a newspaper in Massachusetts.
Back in olden times there was a war about the united states but did you know that it took away to write to constitution and to ratify it. The U.S constitution was to help the country agree on things and stay happy without wars. Ratify means to be approved. Yes the constitution should be ratified because of the bill rights, separation of power and talking about the bill of rights. I think this for these reasons.
As shown by the statement Americans can go against the ideals of anyone without being censored or be threatened by the government. We have more freedoms such as religion, Assembly, and freedom of petition with due said america is built on the rights of the people making Americans “Free”.
Kennedy told the American people “ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.” He said this during a time of great tension and conflict. Today, millions of Americans are facing the same rhetoric and fear that they did during Kennedy’s administration. Only this time, the fear isn't of nuclear destruction, but rather issues that are minuscule. President Obama has done an unprecedented job in reviving the concept of the American Dream, but our expectations and our willingness to achieve the dream has declined.
To start, freedom of religion was important to the framers and the citizens because they had dealt with religious persecution before America separated from Britain. They wanted the ability to practice their religion of choice freely, without the fear of being punished. Also, many wished for religion to be separate from the government, an idea presented by Thomas Jefferson. This would mean that the government would never be able to define one religion for the country, which had previously happened when Britain ruled the colonies. To add, freedom of speech was very important to George Washington and he greatly influenced it being included.
Though I agree with what the act it trying to accomplish because Congress in trying to stay in control of the power to declare war and limit the President’s power to declare war. I honestly feel that power is too much power for one person such as the President to control. I would hope in the future that Congress passes a more effective War Powers Act that the President will have to follow. One of the Presidents that has violated the War Powers Act was President Bill Clinton when he got our military involved in Kosovo. President Clinton didn’t receive Congress’s approval to get involved in the conflict in Kosovo, in fact they voted against it several times.
The pursuit of happiness can be explained as the ability to pursue a successful and stable life. It is the inalienable right of the American citizen to be able to make his or her way to the top. This right, along with that of religion freedom, should not only be protected, but also coincide. The wall of separation was implemented in order to protect America. It was necessary to protect each religious community from each other, but also to protect citizens from a mandated religion.
Washington’s intentions were to avoid a war, rather than creating any disruptions. His decisions proved to be the right ones, and he was able to get on Britain’s good side due to this treaty. This treaty was highly controversial due to the fact that Britain was an old enemy, and they were siding with them. Washington favored Britain in hopes that doing so would cause them to help them out in the future. Jefferson and Madison were not too happy about this because he genuinely wanted the people to be involved instead of being kept in the dark.