Corporal Punishment of children by parents is still a legally, socially and culturally accepted form of discipline of children in South Africa as well as other countries around the world, but there is a great amount of movement against the use of corporal punishment as we have come to the realisation of the harm that it causes.
Corporal punishment is considered to be the physical punishment on the body, or the infliction of pain by a teacher or of any other educational official upon the body of a student. Corporal punishment is used as a penalty for doing something which has been disapproved of by the punisher, for example parents or teachers. It involves hitting or slapping the child with the use of a hand or any other instruments such as
…show more content…
She believes that in banning corporal punishment in all environments, even in the home, will lead to less abuse and violence in society and therefore a more peaceful society for all. Corporal punishment was used as a means to correct behaviour as well as seen as “character building”.
Corporal punishment in South Africa has been used as a form of discipline for a number of years and has withstood scrutiny but recently people have been considering the rights of children when affected by corporal punishment. Corporal punishment goes against the most fundamental rights of any person such as human dignity and physical integrity, the legality of corporal punishment goes against their right to equal protection under the
…show more content…
But the punishment in the home environment still needs to be considered. In the case S v Williams and Others5 the court held that the “deliberate infliction of physical pain on the person of the accused offends societies notions of decency and is a direct invasion of the right which every person has to human dignity.” This case found that where authority is used and where it legitimises violence is inconsistent with the values of the Constitution. Therefore, following this ruling corporal punishment was prohibited as a sentence. Corporal punishment in 1996 was prohibited in schools in the South African Schools Act, stating no person may administer corporal punishment at a school to a learner. If anyone is guilty of an offence they could be convicted of assault. This was challenged by Christian Education of South Africa v Minister of Education, the Appellant argued that the prohibition of corporal punishment invaded their individual, parental and community rights for them to freely practice their religion. They argued that the prohibition infringed the following sections 14, privacy, 15, freedom of religion, belief and opinion, 29, the right to establish and maintain independent educational institutions, 30, language and cultural rights as well as 31, the rights to cultural,
The court believed that the scheme of chastisement under the ruling was consequently “cruel and unusual” if it was too unembellished for the crime, if it was arbitrary, if it affronted societies sagacity of justice, or if it was not more operative than a less unembellished penalty. Reinstating the Death Penalty
My feelings regarding spankings are inappropriate because it models aggressive behavior in young children. 8. Spankings should be administered with care. 9. Corporal punishment is the use of physical force causing pain, but not wounds, as a means of discipline; such as spanking, shaking, slapping hands and etc.
Punishments for severe crimes around the world have been a subject of debate for many years. Different countries have varying views on what punishments are too extreme. The legality of certain forms of punishment is continually evolving in today's age. With the determination of constitutionality, a complex and evolving issue there are many debates around what constitutes cruel and unusual punishments. Despite ongoing controversies and discussions, punishments for serious crimes, including capital punishment, remain legal in some countries and continue to be imposed.
In the article “No Spanking, No Time-out, No Problems”, Olga Khazan uses many rhetorical strategies to support and persuade her audience. That traditional punishment methods of parents will not change a child’s/children’s unruly behavior overall, but positive reinforcement will increase the chances of better behavior not only now, but in the future as well. “Positive reinforcement is the presentation of a pleasurable consequence following a behavior” (Craighead). This twist to traditional discipline teaches children to work towards a resolution instead of teaching them to lean toward violence. “For example, the way that parents discipline their children is how children discipline their peers” (Khazan).
Section 43 of the Criminal Code states that “Every schoolteacher, parent or person standing in the place of a parent is justified in using force by way of correction toward a pupil or child, as the case may be, who is under his care, if the force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances”.(Government of Canada,1985) The action of corporal punishment, otherwise known as “spanking” is done to improve a child’s behaviour or eliminate reoccurrence of disobedience. Spanking a child is an ineffective way to discipline children and exposes them into an aggressive environment. This type of punishment models the use of aggression and violence, teaching children it is acceptable to use violence. The practice of spanking often correlates with children developing into violent adolescents.
The inclusion of a rhetorical question forces readers to see how seemingly simular acts elicit differing responses from the public, and how this conditioned aversion is ‘damaging’ our young. Professor Susan Malone from ‘RACP Paediatrics & Child Health Division’ correlates Critchley’s contention by affirming that research shows a connectedness between corporal punishment and long term health issues such as ‘metal disorders and domestic abuse’. This appeals to the reader’s sense of protection and family, maintaining that the ostensible historical and innocent character of a ‘tap on the bottom’, could have unthought-of adverse effects on their own children. Emotive words such as ‘abuse’, ‘harmful’ and ‘depression’ are integrated not only in the first argument, but throughout the entirety of the opinion piece, to evoke a sense of culpability within parents who do ‘smack’ their children, outlining the negative repercussions these actions
If families do not have some form of discipline inside of their household things would begin to get out of control and become chaotic. So some parents choose to use spankings as a form of discipline. I think that spanking is necessary in raising children. In my household spanking was enforced for my siblings and I when we were younger, it was to teach us what’s right from wrong. Spanking is a disciplinary action where children can learn from it.
Would you say that spanking is appropriate? Many people say yes, because it has been used as a means of punishment for so long; however, more and more people are beginning to realize that corporal punishment may lead to even more problems in the future. Many factors can contribute to your opinion on spanking, such as your ethnic group and religion. For example, African Americans and people who translate the bible literally are more likely to use spanking as a means of punishment (206). There are many good arguments for both sides; however, it is clear that spanking is not necessary and can be avoided completely More people in the United States are beginning to realize how ineffective and dangerous spanking is.
The Essay will also contain the relation between children’s rights and corporal punishment and find suggestion to alternative measures to diminish the problem. 1.2. The research problem Corporal punishment as a practice of behaviour correction of a child was legally abolished in South African schools in 1996. In line with the human rights culture prevailing locally and globally, South Africa adopted a constitution that establishes and protects a range of human rights. In relation to corporal punishment,
Spanking is a form of discipline that parents use towards their children when they are doing something that is deviant. However there are both pros and cons when it comes to spanking a child. A study done by Murray Strauss was conducted to see if spanking increased antisocial behavior in children. A total of 807 mothers, with children ages 6 to 9, were chosen in the study (Strauss, Sugarman, & Giles-Sims, 1997). The results showed that 45% of mothers that spank their children do it around 2.1 times a week (Strauss, Sugarman, & Giles-Sims, 1997).
Many children are exposed to various sexual violence’s and behaviours in their own homes which causes depression, anger issues and mental disorders, but to some it might seem to be the right thing to do and they start to practice what they are exposed to at home at schools to other learners. Learners tend to assault other learners whenever the thoughts of what they experience at home may arise, in this manner they bring what they have seen or heard at home in the school environment. For example a boy who grew up in a home where he was exposed to his father abusing the mother regularly in his presence the child can put what they experienced at home in practice at school. Many South African schools experience this kind of behaviours not knowing were learners got the idea how and why they are behaving in that
Spanking is a type of physical punishment involving the act of striking another person to cause pain, generally with an open hand. More severe forms of spanking, such as switching, paddling, belting, caning, whipping, and birching, involve the use of an implement instead of a hand. Parents tend to spank their child to discontinue an undesired behavior. Throughout history there have been many forms of punishment, such as spanking, grounding, and timeouts. However, have you ever thought about the way it affects a child’s life?
I. Introduction A. P. J. O 'Rourke once said “Everybody knows how to raise children, except the people who have them” (O’Rourke, Pg.10). Parents always want their children to be better than what they used to be when they were at their age; that is why they care about every detail in their children’s life especially when it comes to behavior, obeying them and listening to their words. B. Background Information: i. People came to realize that physical punishment is a rough, atrocious, unacceptable mean of punishment that should be banned for its appalling, horrifying effects. ii. Facts about physical punishment (sources used) 1.
Growing up my parents ran a daycare in(at) our house so I was always surrounded by children (the good and the bad). My parents were the type who had no problem enforcing physical punishments such as spanking, the flick of the hand, a pop on the mouth, etc. All these punishments are within the definition of acceptable punishment as stated by Oklahoma law (qtd. ---). They practiced this on me, my siblings, and the daycare kids (with parental consent).
Introduction Corporal punishment is a controversial topic and has been the source of extensive legal debate on a global scale, with evidence being presented to support numerous countering views and opinions. Reasonable corporal punishment in the home is still protected by the law in South Africa, and many South Africans are in support of the continuation of its legality. Although some of the arguments raised are valid, the evidence conveying the harms inflicted on children by physical disciplinary methods supports the viewthat the defense of reasonable disciplinary chastisement in South Africa should be discontinued and corporal punishment should be illegalized in its entirety. The future of corporal punishment is questionable, and with more