Since the majority of athletes are not on a full ride or do not have a scholarship they should get some type of aid from the school. These athletes should get paid as if it is their job since they devote the same amount of time towards it as they would a job. The fact that scholarships do not cover all expenses for every athlete is one reason why college athletes should get
Athletes tend to leave college early to go pro to earn money to make a living. Athletes that are not on scholarship are in the toughest of positions. These are players that have to pay for college, but have no time to make money for their college. In other words, they pay the college to make money for the college. Most athletes cannot play a college level sport and try to maintain a job.
If he was going to college to play sports and Harvard offered him more money than North Carolina, then the athlete would be more likely to choose Harvard. This just shows how corrupt college sports could get if the athletes were paid. Already, the system of college athletics is corrupt. People see that all this money is being made and the college athletes are completely getting
Another question asked is what effect would being paid have on the athletes? Would athletes become lazy? Would it set them up poorly for the next part of their lives when they will have to work in order to pay bills and support a family? This is the main argument for those who oppose paying college athletes. They claim that if athletes were to start getting paid as a college athlete there is no reason for them to work as hard to become professional athletes or successful in their chosen profession after their playing career.
They have enough money to pay for their house bills or etc. But what if college athletes would actually get paid,but will it be fair if only the good ones get paid and the not so good ones not? No, so if you can 't play all athletes equally, then you shouldn 't pay
The third reason why college athletes should get paid is because they make a ton of money for the college because if they perform on the court they will get more people to attend their games which makes the school more money. “Football programs generate so much money for the university.” “Alumni are so much more generous during years when sports teams win.” These quotes just show that when the athletes perform on the field or court they really are generating more money for their college. Some people believe that college athletes should not get paid. College athletes go to college to learn not to get paid. “Using the inability to distribute the funds equally as an impediment is an excuse.” “Of the $174 million distributed from 5 bowl games, 83.4% went to six conferences.” These quotes show that there is really no excuse for not paying college athletes but that people just want to sit back and complain about how life is not
It affects them in the way of not being “treated” as professionals because they work their butts off to get in the level where they at right now and for them to get receive a single penny is like not receiving a “thank you” for not doing a job. Although college athletes should not get paid because they are receive scholarships from school. Since High School, college coaches look up for all-star players to recruit them and commit them to a college, the coaches offers them a great deal, which is like the scholarship. “Not every high-school sports-star has the brains for college” (The Economist). That means that college athletes have scholarships,although some of them don 't, so why get more
Do college athletes throw their bodies away so programs can succeed and benefit? College athletes put more into the school than regular students. College athletes should be paid for playing because the sport they are participating in is essentially their job, they have no time to do any other activity because it will interfere with their schedules. Another reason I believe this is because of the profit the school makes off of the players. If you or your child was an athlete giving your all to a school and you were still struggling financially to where you can barely take care of yourself would you believe in paying them then?
Because of their dedication and busy schedules, students can not get part time jobs to have any type of income. Meanwhile, the NCAA makes $11 billion from a contract with CBS. The benefits that these players are collecting “have led to a black market for compensating athletes” (Birkenes and
Have you ever thought about about how much time and effort college athletes put into their sport? They spend the majority of their four years in college training for a certain sport. All the time and effort the athletes put in yet they do not receive a penny. Most of these young men and women have moved out of their parents house and have to fend for themselves. College athletes should be paid because college athletes put up the same injury risks as professional athletes, the players bring in money, it could increase motivation for education, and the sport acts as a full time job.
It would be really helpful for some students to get some extra money. An associated press article, “Paying college athletes fits modern reality”, explained that some students come from poor families. Why not let them earn some extra bucks? It states, “They might be sufficient for students with academic scholarships, who can supplement their income by working after class. Athletes often can’t.” This shows that students who come from poor families can’t work after classes even if they wanted to because of practice.
I personlly think NCAA athletes should get paid, because they put a lot on the line to play college ball. Yea they might get paid in free education but you got to look on the other side how are they to support they self for personal needs like tooth paste, cloths, shoes, soap, and many more. What about the ones that go out of there home state and play. Their family many miles away so they can’t get to much support from them. Other sports fans do not want to see athletes paid because they say “ it will destroy their notion of amateur athletics.” They stick with the belief that a “free education” is compensation enough for what the athletes provide for the school.
In conclusion, college athletes should be paid because they bring in a ton of revenue for their schools while risking injury and yet are unable to afford the cost of living. The time that is put into the sport is the equivalent, if not more, than the time that is put into a full time job. Only thirty-three percent of students receive scholarships, most of them partial. Also, only one percent of all college athletes will play professional sports after their college tenure is served. The NCAA and Division One Colleges generate profits that do not trickle down to the athletes.
Furthermore, the decision to start paying the athletes not only would create a even playing field that has typically been swayed toward the universities. Stipends are needed to control how much is allocated, but that itself will be the spark that is needed. This is important because the relationship between the NCAA and their athletes are like any other employer its employee; employer should pay the employee what they are worth, not just what they feel is equal. The NCAA has duplicated the structure that held many people down in the 1800’s - slavery. They earn the massive income as the laborers (athlete) settle for pennies.
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.