FOCUS STUDENT 1
a) Focus Student 1 completed the assessment well, he achieved some of the use of academic language throughout his graphic organizer. Focus Student 1 was able to successfully compare and contrast the arguments/rational of Hoovers response to the Great Depression to Roosevelts response. For example, Focus Student 1 was able to show me that Hoover believed that the government should not get involved with helping its citizens, where FDR thought the government should get involved. As well, he was able to provide me with an acceptable summary. However, I would have like to have seen more details in his summary. All he was able to provide me with was that FDR did more than Hoover.
b) I provided Focus Student 1 with oral feedback
…show more content…
For example, when I look back at his summary and see, "In total, although Hoover and FDR were presidents during the same time period, FDR did more to help," I can’t help but think that this student is trying to find an easy way out of using those critical thinking skills. For future assessments I will provide Focus Student 1 with more guidance as to things that should be expanded on. Other students in the class also need this guidance. I also would like to pair Focus Student 1 with individuals who are more on his academic leave. This way she can be more comfortable and better collaborate with his fellow …show more content…
However, she didn’t accurately compare and contrast the two president’s policies. For example, when comparing both Hoover and FDR Focus Student 2 said, "Both wanted Mexicans to leave," this comparison is false. Although, Hoover wanted the Hispanic population to leave the United States during the Great Depression, it was FDR who invited Mexican workers to come to the United States to help farm. As well, Focus Student 2 made no comments about the comparison of FDR and Hoover with regards to the
Even though Hoover wasn’t re-elected after 1933, his failed attempt at laissez-faire still affected the American people. An example of this is Roosevelt’s attempt at counteracting Hoover’s Rugged individualism. During Roosevelt’s campaign he promised a ‘New Deal’ for the American people, where, especially in comparison to Hoover’s: ‘laissev-faire’, the US government would be more involved with businesses and the country’s citizens. Summed up, the ‘New Deal’ was about doing everything to keep the country from disaster.
Herbert Hoover, the son of a Quaker blacksmith named Jesse Hoover and mother, Hulda Hoover, was a man who put others in front of himself; he liked to help others in need. He graduated from Stanford University with a degree in mining engineering which he used for many impressive accomplishments including such ideas as the Hoover Dam and working in the mining industry. Hoover had worked for Presidents Coolidge and Harding as their Secretary of Commerce. His life before presidency was dedicated to humanitarian works, one example of this work included helping to feed people in war torn countries. However, his presidency was undermined by the members of congress due to the blame of the stock market crash and the Great Depression despite his charity
Before Herbert Hoover served as America’s 31st president during the years 1929 to 1933, Hoover accomplished global success as a mining engineer and worldwide gratitude as “The Great Humanitarian” who fed worn torn Europe during and after World War I. President Hoover brought to the presidency an outstanding reputation for public service as an engineer, administrator, and humanitarian. When the Republican convention in Kansas City began in the summer of 1928, the fifty-three-year old Herbert Hoover was an the boarder line of winning his party 's nomination for president. He had won many primaries in California, Oregon, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Michigan, and Maryland. Among important Republican supporters he had the help of women, progressives internationals, the new business elites, and corporate interests party regulars grudgingly supported Hoover,but they never trusted him. The convention voted Hoover on the first ballot teaming him with Senate Leader Charles Curtis of Kansas.
FDR Vs. LBJ Because of their position in the government, Americans have such high standards for presidents. However, a lot of the time presidents are criticized more for their mistakes rather than their accomplishments. As Michael Siegel shows in his book President as Leader “presidential leadership is exercised by real, flawed human beings, and not by superheroes or philosopher-kings beyond the reach of scrutiny or critique.”
Hoover President Herbert Hoover didn’t believe that it was the federal government’s role to provide direct relief. Instead he suggested voluntarism, asking corporations to improve working conditions and wages. Lowering income taxes was another idea promoted by Hoover. If people would spend less on taxes, they would invest in stock market and purchase products. Hoover refused against any form of a welfare program.
The programs created by the New Deal satisfied the needs of citizens, even though several thought Roosevelt was overstepping his power. Roosevelt’s administration was not very effective in ending the Great Depression, however, some of the programs did help relieve
Hoover did more than any previous president, but Roosevelt did much, much more than Hoover. The second is that Roosevelt did more to try to boost the morale of the people than Hoover had done. Roosevelt tried to convince people that things would get better and that the
President Hoover and President Roosevelt are very different from each other however they do have some similarities. They both had policies to help the people in the Great Depression. Even though the people favor one more than the other they both attempted to help the economy. President Hoover believe that the people should be more independent and not depend on the government as much as the people did. This was simple for him because he was a millionaire.
As a demonstration, Hoover explains that “Freedom does not die from frontal attack, It dies because men in power no longer believe in the system based upon liberty…” to explain how the New Deal was manipulating the country, leaving the citizens with no other option but to follow the rules. Indeed, what Roosevelt was trying to do was to create monopolies and to fix prices with his program to control the economy. Demonstrating how freedom was not a high priority presented in the New Deal. In conclusion, Roosevelt took an excessive amount of authority while on his presidency to eliminate the depression.
The transition between presidents Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt marked the transformation from a weak, to a strong form of government, which became directly involved in the lives of the people. This was primarily caused by the difference in the executive leaders ideologies, where Hoover was more focused on individual responsibility and capitalism, Roosevelt was more concerned with immediate action based on government intervention. Overall, the New Deal sacrificed the amount of personal responsibility that the people had with their own economic security. The power of the federal government was strengthened, but the long-lasting effects based on the social and economic policies was beneficial for the United States. Herbert Hoover began
The Harlem Renaissance was a black literary and art movement that began in Harlem, New York. Migrants from the South came to Harlem with new ideas and a new type of music called Jazz. Harlem welcomed many African Americans who were talented. Writers in the Harlem Renaissance had separated themselves from the isolated white writers which made up the “lost generation” The formation of a new African American cultural identity is what made the Harlem Renaissance and the Lost Generation unique in American culture because it influenced white literacy and it was a sense of freedom for African Americans.
Roosevelt was the president after Hoover, he served from 1933 to 1945. He thought it was best to have the government take care of the people in this crisis with social programs. “ Instinctively we recognized a deeper need-the need to find through government the instrument of our united purpose.” Hoover's idea did not work he thought more people would try to help out however they did not.
Roosevelt was elected following Hoover and he had a very different and more uplifting outlook on how to help America. FDR said how the people had to face reality and stop fearing the efforts needed to help America. (Document 5.) He makes it known that he is going to be a leader and lead America out of these dark times. He portrayed strong belief in the nation and the people itself and makes the problems known.
All of these programs seemed to help and Americans were better off, but the Great Depression was over. Roosevelt continued to push for more reform, but in 1937 business slowed and another recession hit the nation. Now Roosevelt is being blamed for the nation’s problems. He was now at a
Long, holds the idea that the government should intervene in industry in order to share wealth across all classes to provide equal opportunity, while President Hoover advocates as little government intervention as possible without actually becoming laissez faire. I agree more with Hoover, although Long makes some points that I do not necessarily disagree with, such as opportunity of inheritance. I use Haiti as an example in distributing wealth after gaining independence. Without large economic and industrial holders, they were never able to advance in technology or business because no one had the resources to get it started. I do not blame the top 1% for the economic downfall of the lower class, but I see larger social problems as the main source especially in American Society.