Although after she watched it she said she liked it. The screenplay writer was Destin Daniel Cretton, who the director of the film too. The movie has some big names like Naomi Watts (her bigger movies are The Ring or King Kong), and Woody Harrelson (The Hunger Games, Now You See Me). Brie Larson (The Room) plays the role of Jeanette Walls. The trailer shows some big events of the book, but nothing that would be crucial of the movie’s going to be good or bad.
Do you read the book and compare it to the movie, or do you watch the movie and compare it to the book? I have read and watched Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone more times than I can count. The book allows you to accomplish your creative side and use your imagination to feel the places as well as the scenes. You can develop an image in your mind of what you predict a character will look like and how they will sound. There is no dissatisfactory acting so you can imagine it the way you want, anywhere you want.
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is a masterful novel that dives into the life of Scout as a child. In the novel, Lee goes into much depth about Scout’s life so that the reader can always keep up with what is happening. When a book is converted into a movie, many things often change no matter what book it is. This remains true for To Kill a Mockingbird between the book and the film. The film is a wonderful work but there were still many things cut out that were in the book.
What Information is Necessary? Mya Maldini In the book the Paper Towns by John Green there are many noticeable differences compared to the movie. This includes special characters and locations. As the audience, I believe to create a successful film, that it is important to include as much detail that was in the novel, but in a summarized fashion. John Green did a good job at getting most of the important details into the movie, but as a reader there are a couple parts that may stand out.
The producers, it seems while trying to make the movie fit the modern times, they cutout or changed certain things about characters, theme, and symbols that caused it to be slight different from the book. The fact is that no matter how well the movie covers the book, there will always be some noticeable difference, as Fitzgerald’s words from the book paint’s a vivid picture of the scenes, that it’s come to life in the mind of its reader. Therefore, even with a perfect design, cast, and performance, any movie version can only disappoint. One of the biggest difference can be seen in the theme representation of the American Dream. While the movie shows the achievement of the American dream, the book shows its failure.
When it comes to the portrayal of literary work, many people prefer movies over books. Even though they both have similar content, movies tend to add or switch up details of the story version. This is to either gain a broader audience or make more money off of the entertainment. One comparison I want to discuss is the story of, “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow, by Washington Irving and Tim Burton’s, Sleepy Hollow. There is a huge gap between the story, which came out in 1820 and the 1999 movie.
Magua, whom was introduced in an early scene, was much more developed in the book. Also in the movie, there are stereotypes that applied to Magua’s character. Stereotypes can make the movie better, but sometimes it is better to completely base a movie off of a book. Another example of this is Alice, Cora’s younger sister. Alice, in the book, doesn’t have a childlike exuberance.
The movie only focuses on the story of the Andrea Gail and the men from Gloucester. I think the overall story is better off this way. For example, I think if the book was written like this, the reader would become more connected to the characters and the book. The reader would go through the same emotions and feelings as the characters because they experienced the same event simultaneously. All in all, I think the book has a great story, but lacks a proper structure for the story at hand.
Good morning to my beautiful lecturer Miss Nazratul Akmal Hashim and fellow friends. On this beautiful morning, I would love to share with you a very exciting and adrenaline-pumping movie that I have watched. The title of the movie is What Happened to Monday? Or Seven Sisters. The 123 minutes movie was produced by a very good and commit producer, Max Botkin under Rafaella Production.
Which Odin got mad because he got it from his mother and gave it to Desi. In my opinion I think the movie O explains more better of the plot then the play because the movie is more realistic and shows good parts that look real and what is really going on but in the play everything looks fake of what they are very hard to understand what they are saying. In movie they use word that they relate to us at school and we understand much better they use modern words. It’s just my opinion I think the movie O is better than the play othello us students understand more what is really going on in the movie it relates to us because we're in high school in the movie O there at a high school and high school may have a lot of drama and it helps us understand the plot