While we talk about globalization, most of us would think of it as the process by which companies move their business beyond domestic and expand to other markets around the globe. It is supposed to increase the interconnection, to boost international economy, and to benefit all countries involved in the trade. However, the dark side of globalization is that it destroyed the life of people who lived in developing countries, particularly female workers. The effects are demonstrated in the film “Maquilapolis” and Lopez’s article. Since companies only take profit as their first concern, I believe female workers in developing countries were suffering mentally and physically from the negative effects of globalization because their problem was ignored …show more content…
Due to globalization, the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed by Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The purpose was to remove barriers to the exchange of goods and services, but it hurt Mexican agriculture. Rural Mexican farmers could not compete the U.S agribusiness which lead mass migration of farmworkers to the U.S. Under this situation, the real victims were women left behind in Mexico. Their husbands escaped from poverty in a different country where they can make more money. Some men even find a new wife and stop providing financial support to families in Mexico. Women lost their spouses and struggle to feed the children. As Lopez states, “many abandoned women regularly express overt manifestations of chronic depression… many women I spoke with consistently disclosed that migration had dismembered families and destroyed domestic life in Mexico” (p36). Abandonment caused serious mental problem for Mexican women, but we were not able to image how difficult those abandoned women’s life were. The root of the problem came from globalization. If farmers could compete with other agribusiness, there is no need to flee to the U.S, and the abandonment would less likely to happen, at least those families would be integrated. Moreover, since abandoned women had few choices …show more content…
Globalization brought many multinational corporations to trade in different countries. That is believe to boost economy and benefit everyone. But the problem is that companies only look at their own profit, they cared more about maximize profit rather development. No health protection and labor rights were guaranteed to maquiladora workers and they were exploited. When globalization made Mexican farmers to flee to the U.S, the life of Mexican women was extremely difficult. Although the two groups participated in globalization, the only winning group was multinational corporation. Because workers sacrificed their life to satisfy the greed of companies. Globalization could be good, but only when every group of people are taken into consideration and companies are willing to distribute their profit evenly and reward those who work for them. Because it is unfair to produce profit on those who struggle to live their life. Therefore, I really hope there could be a balance between companies and workers while developing
Harvest of Loneliness by Gilbert Gonzalez presents personal accounts of Mexicans who participated in the Bracero Program. These accounts reveal the illusory, false hope embedded in the program along with its inhumane abuses. Such false hope being that for many Mexican men living in Mexico was difficult to provide for their wives and children, many wanted to own more land but did not have any means. Thus, the Bracero program was a strong alternative for them because their American job earnings could be sent back to their families in Mexico to buy more land or tools to possibly do their own farming in Mexico.
During 1942-1964 many Mexican immigrants were “given” the “opportunity” to enter the United States in order to labor and help the United States economic industry. For many immigrants the bordering country was seen as an exceptional place that offered great opportunities but at the same time many family difficulties. The Bracero Program during the 20th century for many Mexicans was seen as an exceptional deal that offered immigrants and infinite amount of opportunities to succeed; however, in Ejemplar y sin igual we realize that the Bracero Program in reality was not the “exceptional program” everyone thought. In Ejemplar y sin igual, Elizabeth Rosas mentions that “an entire generation of children experienced uniquely difficult childhoods because
There are many aspects that contribute to the sense of urgency felt by many immigrants. NAFTA, The North American Trade Agreement, was enacted in 1994, between the U.S., Canada and Mexico. This agreement pushed lots of cheap imports into the Mexican markets, which pushed many farmers and low wageworkers out of a job, because their people could not compete with them. Lack of job prospects and a steady source of income lead many people to abandon their homeland for what seems like the only option for a better life. “We as Mexicans became the enemy.
Within the past one and a half centuries, ever since the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, it allowed the United States to take a large portion of land. Since then, many Mexicans have been trying to emigrate themselves over to America, leaving behind their homelands. Mexican immigration in the early 1900 's was a huge issue that impacted the United State, in areas such as urban population, employment and many other ways. The mass number of Mexican immigrant 's that migrated to the United States from Mexico was at nearly half million in between the years of 1920 and 1929. Mexicans left their native land and moved to the United States not only to achieve financial prosperity, but to get out of the chaotic environment that Mexico was in at
To what extent does globalization contribute to sustainable prosperity for all people? Globalization contributes largely to sustainable prosperity for all people. Sustainable prosperity is when people of any ethnicity,religion or gender have all their needs met, all have an equal opportunity to create wealth and all to have the chance to pursue happiness. There are many groups that try to make sure everyone has sustainable prosperity. Based on the perspective demonstrated the source should be embraced to a certain extent.
Culture is an essential part of a community’s identity, because it links individuals to a collective bond. The Americas have always contained a vast variety of cultural communities, especially in the United States. The US is known for being one of the most diverse nations in the world, housing hundreds of different cultures. Mexican-Americans display a strong sense of a cultural background, which falls as a subset of the bigger Latino culture that links all Latinos. Oral history is a major aspect on the Mexican culture, which contributes to the truth of how history in the United States actually happened.
In her book, From Out of the Shadows, Viki L. Ruiz argues the contributions to history that was made by farm workers, activists, leaders, volunteers, feminists, flappers, and Mexican women. She explores the lives of the innovative and brave immigrant women, their goals and choices they make, and how they helped develop the Latino American community. While their stories were kept in the shadows, Ruiz used documented investigations and interviews to expose the accounts of these ‘invisible’ women, the communities they created, and the struggles they faced in hostile environments. The narrative and heartfelt approach used by Ruiz give the reader the evidence to understand as well as the details to identify or empathize with.
Opportunities and tensions from World War II caused Mexican Americans to be victims of racism in public, they were treated differently in the workplace,
11.5 million immigrants come into the United States every year. 13.5% of United States population are migrants that leave everything behind and their family to get there, and only 28% of foreign immigrants from Mexico make it to the United States every year. Additionally 64.5% of hondurans are living in poverty, according to The Immigration Policy Institute. Sonia Nazario demonstrates how the matter of immigration affects family values, causes discriminacion and more drug use. Many cultures around the world have different ideas about all of these subjects.
Globalization is the inclusion of the differents values socio-cultural and economic local from one country to another, through their relationships exchanged a series of products and knowledge that extend and increase their ideological and economic situation. Globalization is beneficial for businesses of Colombians. As well as has influenced in areas as the social, economic, cultural, political, technological and educational in our country, globalization has ventured into the business of Colombians to favor or disfavor wholesale sales. Globalization has been a transition process started from the time of conquest and colonization, this exchange of cultural contracted a new market with mobility and trade of products and goods which over time did not stop there, but rather it was intensified and point greater flowed recognition from the
NAFTA took effect in January of 1994.Its main purpose is to increase the agriculture trade and investment among the three countries. According to the department of agriculture, Mexico lost over 900,000 farming jobs in the first decade of NAFTA. ( McKenzie, 2015 ). Before NAFTA people of Mexico grew corn and was able to support their family and country economy. Shortly after NAFTA cheap American corn came pouring in form the borders, which caused a major effect on families that were working in farms in Mexico.
Globalization is a massive thing that affects every person on the planet in one way or another. This source raises the argument that globalization is a disease that harms people in more ways then it helps and needs to be stopped before it wipes out the human race. This raises a good point is some ways because globalization does harm humans in many way such as losing jobs due to outsourcing and the people who get the outsourced jobs are put into horrible working conditions and underpaid without benefits. But it also helps in some ways with trade and communication strengthening the relations of countries. I do agree with the source that globalization harms many people but not quite to the extent that the author goes to, I think that
Western feminism has faced several issues over the years in its ideals, where many people challenged this notion on whether it truly assists all women from different regions of the world. Chandra Talpade Mohanty’s book Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity critiques Western feminism and promotes the ideas of feminism through a global context. Mohanty illustrates the importance of “feminism without borders,” signifying the necessity of feminism recognizing the realities of the issues faced by women of all backgrounds from all over the world.
Each society possesses distinctive culture that varies from each other, yet has commonalities, as well. Patriarchy long has been one of such common features, and is still so in many states. It is the male, especially fathers, rule, while the opposite gender is expected to be submissive (Sultana, 2010). Over time, the level of patriarchy has mitigated, especially following the women feminist movements, exclusively in the West, and the situation of gender equality has improved (Evelyn and Adedayo, 2014). It is essential to convey these western ideas everywhere, as they are most humanist and just, so far.
If they do not participate in this process the economies are negatively affected. Therefore, economic globalization doesn’t seem a good process. Globalization has affected everyone differently. While it is also said to unite countries, it has increased the gap between rich and poor by helping the wealthy people of the society. Many smaller firms and companies have seen the fall due to