The movie was much more detailed than the book, therefore making the movie better. In the movie all the characters spoke and had lines. But, in the book the characters barely even spoke. Also, in the book the author was just stating facts and not showing as much detail or action as in the movie. The movie is much more interesting because in the book, they only really focus on NASA and them working to launch a man into space. In the movie they also focus on the issues with racism and sexism. Therefore, the movie was much more detailed in the book. In my first paragraph my reasoning was that the characters didn 't speak many times in the book. There is no direct quote that shows that the people didn 't speak many times. But, if you read the whole book you will notice that all the characters in total speak only about 4 or 5 times. Speaking 4 to 5 times is very little considering that this book is about 200 pages long. This evidence proves my point because it shows that the book had very little dialogue. When we went to watch the movie there were many characters speaking and a lot of dialogue because it 's a movie and movies have a lot of dialogue. Additionally, in the paragraph above I said that the book was boring because all it did was give facts. ¨In February 1960, as the Space Task Group pushed …show more content…
In conclusion, the movie was much more detailed than the book. In the book all characters had lines to speak. In the book the characters barely spoke. The author of the book was just writing facts in the book. The movie had much more action than the book because the movie was doing much more than stating facts. In the book they only focus on the part of sending a man into space. However, the movie did a very good job in showing all the other problems going on at the time. The movie showed the problems of racism and women equal rights. These reasons are valid because of my logic and evidence in the paragraph above. Overall, I liked the movie better than
The movie was much more efficient for me because I am a slow reader and I do not do well with comprehending reading. The movie gave me a quick way of watching and understanding what was going on. It was much faster for me than reading the book. Although the book gave a good accurate presentation, the movie gave me a visual and factual presentation.
Why did hollywood change the story of Beowulf? So why did hollywood change the story of beowulf? There are many different reasons why they would change the story, such as, they were just trying to change it to entertain the modern day people, also because that's just what hollywood does, they changer books or stories to what they think would get they the most views. People now a days are a tough crowd to please, there are certain things that make them interested in a movie or a book, hollywood was trying to change the book to make more people want to watch the movie, for example in the book Grendel slays the Danes in the night while they are sleeping so none of them have the chance to challenge him, in the movie Grendel bursts into Heorot in the night but the Danes are awake and they fully witness his killing. Hollywood changed the movie the way they did to help get
The movie and the book tell the story of hidden figures differently by the movie contributing dialogue , and the book contributing
Another difference is that in the movie they go into town, but in the book it 's never mentioned. Something else that was different was that in the book the mood was happy most of the time, while in the movie the mood was sad. A difference between the book and the movie is that in the book momma was going to burn Byron, but in the movie she does not burn him. A big difference is that in the
Many people, if asked what they would prefer, would prefer to read the book instead of watching the movie. It could be because the movie will always leave some parts from the story out. It seems like directors of the movie always leave out parts from the book, only incorporating the important parts from the story. Some also say that they prefer to leave the descriptions of things in the book up to their imagination. Also, when you are reading the book, you get to read the main characters point of view on things.
There are details left out of the movie that were in the book, the movie doesn 't demonstrate the ongoing theme of hunger as well as the book does, and the the movie does a better job with
In the end I found the film to be easier to understand vs the book as it was an easier and more straight forward plot line whereas in the book it seemed to jump around leading to constant flipping between stories and pages to get a better
The last distinction I found was the age of Cindy Lu. In the book, the say that Cindy Lu was no more than two. But in the movie, she looks older than two. Cindy Lu has a bigger role in the movie than the book. I found many differences in the book and movie.
There are many differences made in the movie and the book to simplify the plot to save time. Majority of the simplifications being made do not affect the story, but have a different way of portraying each chapter. The movie and the book portray the messages in different ways with the same meaning. What happened in the beginning of the movie was that Huck was getting into a fight with a kid and he soon discovered Pap’s footprint, while in the beginning of the book Huck being civilized by Widow Douglas.
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.
When one watches a movie, the experience is not life changing no matter how thrilling the experience was. It is not engraved into the brain as it is only a temporary adrenaline rush. When watching a movie, one feels as though one is watching the story from outside and not truly experiencing it through the main character. In addition, movies are often two hours long. If a movie was based on a book, which it often is, there would not be enough time to include minor details.