The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: An Analysis
The novel by Patrick Lencioni, The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, goes into vivid detail isolating elements of human behavior that when dealt with minimally are unimportant- however, when encountered on a larger scale or in a team setting, can become precarious territory. By introducing relatable characters stereotypical of real personas that the audience has either worked with or can easily imagine, Lecoioni (2007) describes fault lines that any team can fall into and how to work their way out. The executive board analyzed is made of multiple strong personalities and each with a varying communication style. Ranging from Kathryn- the outside force brought in to help, to Jeff the former CEO who stepped …show more content…
One definition of ‘trust’ as defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2004) is “dependence on something future or contingent.” The lack of trust on Lecioni’s (2007) fictional team leads to false pretenses, lack of follow-through, and absence of conflict. The author explicitly describes what power foundation of trust holds. For a team to be effective, the members need to rely on one another and reliance implies a level of liability and risk. Much like a circle, accountability causes follow-through and conflict when differing opinions arise, and honest conflict in a safe environment creates more trust. In the beginning of the novel, the executive staff is much like a group of individuals working for their own best interest deprived of a group vision or end goal. This establishes a foundation of large egos and little confidence in one another. Through tough conversations and forced conflict, Kathryn works with her team on both an individual and a group level to institute a trustful understanding and create an environment where everyone utilizes each other’s strengths and supplements weaknesses as forward motion to common positive company …show more content…
Through their research, they identified a positive correlational relationship between laissez- faire leadership and role ambiguity and also with conflict among the team members-both of these outcomes were produced on the DecisionTech executive team. Ambiguity, as found in the research, is a direct connection to the third dysfunction described in the novel- “lack of commitment” (Lencioni, 2007.) Having uncertain roles on a team creates an environment that encourages apathy in goal completion. The lack of follow through is related to the individual intrinsic value that each team member has- when one’s role is not clearly defined and established, the member lacks role value on the team and therefor does not feel the need to commit to decisions made as a team
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
We see this in the next section organizational leadership has developed unseen subcultures that counter act the team mentality. (Organizational Leadership Now 11.67 Preferred 39.17) The desire of the ownership does not seem to be resonating with the leadership of each department. The ownership treats the leadership team as a team, however, the leadership team treats the crews as family, allow me to show the difference. Team, is the element that focused on top tier thinking, hiring the best and firing the rest.
One would think a coach would have a semi decent relationship with their players; however that was not the case with Coach Mel Thompson and the Citadel basketball team. Throughout the memoir, My Losing Season by Pat Conroy, it is evident Mel gave everyone on the team, including Pat a difficult time. Mel’s behavior towards the team helped Pat improve himself not only as an athlete, but as a person and writer. “If Pat scores one or two points a game and runs the team well, we can’t ask any more from him this year”, is not something a supportive coach would say about one of their players. Mel Thompson is not exactly the supportive coach on this team.
Trust is a feeling or emotion that comes to a person over time. It can be a privilege that can be earned through actions. In one such book, called Staying Fat for Sarah Byrnes trust occurs in parts of the story. But there is also abuse and betrayal. While reading this novel it gave me a point of view on the pain most of the characters were experiencing.
Though situations may arise where trust and survival concur, in order to secure safety, placing trust within others no longer remains an option, whether they be strangers, acquaintances, or young children. Once safety is guaranteed, the concept of trust no longer exists, as trust is either diminished by the war or facing misinterpretation. However, the novel does not have only negative outlooks on reliance and faith; trust that was lost can and was
Trust is a complex concept, as it can be characterized as feeling a strong sense of loyalty and reliability or the action of being able to disclose secrets and personal information to a dependable individual. Trust is a necessity in human nature, as it is fundamental for the foundations of relationships with family and friends among us. Trust is remarkably diverse. In fact, the most ordinary human interactions would be nearly impossible without trust in some degree. The element of trust is also something that can be gained and lost.
The Ideal Team Player: How to Recognize and Cultivate the Three Essential Virtues is an excellent book written by Patrick Lencioni (2016), to those who are seeking to be the ideal player and recognizing the ideal team player. Furthermore, Lencioni writes this book it what seems to be an unorthodox way. However, I appreciate this style of writing.
For example if a leader keeps failing at protecting their people then they might lose trust in them, people also lose trust when they get lied to.. An example of Odysseus’ men trusting him is in book ten when he asks a few of them to explore the land of the Laestrygones to see what type of people live there, ¨So I sent two of my company with an attendant to find out what sort of people the inhabitants were.¨ (Homer par. 8). This is an example of trust because Odysseus is trusting them that they will tell the truth and not run off with whoever lives off that
We all have different ways of perceiving and making sense of the world around us. What an individual considers a golden opportunity another considers a threat. Perception is the process of receiving information about and making sense of the world around us (McShane et al., 2010: 88). Perception crafts our understanding of the world around us and allows us to act within our environment. Perception isn’t a notion a manager or team leader can directly access or fix in others.
William’s play A Streetcar Named Desire presents a variety of perspectives on relationships, especially addressing the idea that bonds which aren’t bound by trust, loyalty and lust in an even balance will inevitably fail. Tennessee Williams uses the interaction between his characters, predominantly Blanche, Mitch, Stella and Stanley; to express a variety of ideas regarding relationships. These connections can be witnessed in scenes 2, 3, 6 and 11, through the use of stage directions, dialogue and expressionism to display different perspectives of character interaction. Trust acts as the foundation to any relationship, establishing a strong link between individuals and without it, the connection will eventually disintegrate.
Trust is what makes the world go round. Without trust, people wouldn’t know how to live. Sometimes trust can cause a person’s downfall. In Macbeth, trust fools plenty of citizens in Scotland. Although some people may become skeptical too quickly, people should be careful who they trust because people can have bad intentions and betray each other no matter what.
3. What are the implications of role ambiguity within a team framework and with regard to: a. Task achievement b. Team cohesion c. Personal achievement Implications of role ambiguity within a team framework and with regard to the following are: A. Task achievement - Will not be fulfilled if team members are unclear as to what is expected of them to do. No significant task can be accomplished without the help of other members. B. Team cohesion - Within the team, members typically specialise in deferent tasks.
With this knowledge, you have to trust every person to do their job without fail or else your thinking crashes the entire operation. In conclusion, the philosophies of distrust and trust and use manipulation is seen either influencing or being used by all
Trust is very important, but it is a challenging feat to obtain. People within the group must trust one another that way each member will help others reach the overall goal and it makes sure that each team member can focus on one specific task without worrying if the others will complete their tasks. An example would be that if each member needs to collect different types of data, one member can finish collecting theirs and immediately know that the others have finished as well, where if they do not trust you, they will worry about not getting finished, covering another person’s job, and stress over slowing down the project. This is significant because if people are not trustable and people have to do other member’s jobs then it slows down the process and it takes longer to reach that special goal, whatever it may be. That is why I believe trust is important in teamwork, so try to be trustable and be smart about who you
Laissez Faire Leaders are ones who choose not to intervene and will allow the group to make decisions independently. This style can happen automatically and will result in a loss of group direction if the leader is inadequate. Lewin (1985) found that when subjected to this style of leadership, group members were inclined to be aggressive towards each other and gave up easily when mistakes occur. In this style of leadership, the characteristics adopted by the leader depends fundamentally on how favourable the situation