Have you ever wondered why your beauty products never burned your face? If you have it’s, because they’ve been tested on animals before they were shipped out. Animals should be used for scientific research, because there’s no harm done to humans, they can get cured themselves, and cancer survival rates increase.
In addition there is no harm caused to humans. For example, “Animal testing allows you to develop more full knowledge of the benefits and risks of a product.” (www.testing.procon.org). This means before you buy the product you know how that product can be helpful to you and if it may mess something up.
Also, the animals can get cured in the process of testing. The webpage sites, “Animal testing allows for cures and treatments to be developed for animals themselves.” (http://animal-testing.procon.org/). Which may mean that while the scientist are testing a product on animals, the animals might get cured through the process of testing.
To wrap this all up, cancer survival rates increase since animal testing began. This website shows, “Cancer survival rates continued to rise after testing on animals began.” (www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk). Which means that after animal testing began cancer survival rates went up in humans, because they were able to find cures when they
…show more content…
There should be no harm caused to humans, because they are able to have a say in what they want and we don’t know what they would be thinking or trying to get out to us. While the animals get cured themselves isn’t that good? I mean they are getting healed of their hurt or problems. As the cancer survival rates people get a second chance at living and they have hope. This is important, because we are making sure us humans have no bad reactions or nothing happens to us while using an everyday
This research is unfair and animals in this test don’t understand anything that is going to happen to them. Furthermore, animals “suffer painful procedures and isolations”(Source A) that really impacts the way scientists are saving human lives. However if we don’t stop animal testing, we could save lives but we won’t be helping the innocent animals the could be endangered and-and almost instinct. There are also alternatives that scientist could use to see if the product they have created could impact human lives. I think that if scientist test one cell organisms they could find the result of the experiment and see what could impact the entire body of a human or an
Many human diseases exist in other species also. Cancer, heart failure, asthma, rabies, etc. are natural diseases in many different animals and testing began with animals with cures, preventions, and treatments now available for animals and humans. The polio vaccine used in humans is still used in wild chimps today and was originally tested on primates before it was introduced to humans. The elimination of smallpox is possible because it was originally tested on animal. These are only a few that we contribute to the use of animal testing.
After Sun reassures readers that the animals are completely safe and pain-free, she is able to reinforce how animal testing is beneficial through sound research. “The truth behind animal testing,” explains how specific discoveries such as insulin, blood transfusions, penicillin, so on and so forth have been unearthed because of animal testing. Today, many people can relate to these medical advances because they are so commonly used in hospitals and the medical field. Sun’s research even introduces multiple cases where animal testing was successful. One such case included Charles Chamberland who was able to find a vaccine for both cholera and anthrax through animal experimentation with little harm to the chickens he was testing.
Some have said that using animals is contradicting our claim on finding accurate cures because animals are different than humans which means they will react differently. Although this is true and they are not exact carbon copies of us, they are close enough to receive results from. Vittana.org states, “The reason why mice are frequently used in animal research is that their genetic profile is 98% similar to
"The term 'animal testing' refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and disease. Asserting the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/Argo-chemicals (“About Animal Testing”)”. 3. Till this day, animal testing is considered justified because scientists believe any type of animal is obligated to sacrifice itself in order to make new products safer for human use and consumption (“Save the Animals”).
Not only do humans benefit from the research or experimentation done on them but they do as well when the great discovery of vaccines were found it was great step to fighting TB, Rubella, Cervical Cancer but also animals benefited from it prevention for rabies, infectious hepatitis virus, anthrax, feline leukemia, and canine
We also have antibiotics and vaccines to prevent infections (Understanding Animal Research, 2014). According to studies, breast cancer is the most common cancer after non-melanoma skin cancer. The wide range of breast cancer treatments was all discovered and developed through animal testing. Those treatments include surgery, chemotherapy, high-dose x-rays, and hormones such as tamoxifen, Herceptin and aromatase inhibitors (Understanding Animal Research, 2014). Moreover, the development of the heart-lung machine depended heavily on animal testing.
If tests go wrong they can affect the animals in various ways that can be very dangerous. Say an experiment has not been figured out yet and this is the first time testing it on an animal. Two things could happen: one, the experiment could succeed and move on. Or two, it could fail and be a disaster for both the people and the animals and the animal could possibly die. So, people should keep the animals safe instead of putting them in danger.
“Taking a healthy being from a completely different species, artificially inducing a condition that he or she would never normally contract, keeping him or her in an unnatural and distressful environment, and trying to apply the results to naturally occurring diseases in human beings is dubious at best,” (Animal Testing is Bad Science, PETA). There have been medications that were tested on animals, which did not turn out well for humans. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), “ninety-two percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don't work or are dangerous. And of the small percentage that are approved for human use, half are relabeled because of side effects that were not identified in animal tests,” (Animal Testing is Bad Science, PETA). Former National Cancer Institute Director Dr. Richard Klausner stated, “We have cured mice of cancer for decades, and it simply didn’t work in humans,” (Cancer-Cure Story Raises New Questions, Marlene
Should animals be suffering just because humans are trying to advance our medical techniques? Should they be forced to eat? Should people be allowed to torture them this way? Do you think so? In fact, more than 100 million animals are killed each year during scientific and commercial testing, in the U.S alone.
Leukemia used to be a death sentence with a survival rate of 4%, but now, because of testing, there is an 80% chance of survival. These odds are much more pleasant than the ones before research. People have gotten help for many diseases because of the research and testing done on animals. Not only does testing help humans, it also leads to developing life saving medical treatments for animals as well.
This proves how immoral it is to test on animals especially since the law does not require the cosmetics to be tested. The most plausible answer for why the animals are being tested on is a business wants to make money and if the business cosmetic is unsafe and harms one human then no one is going to want to buy another cosmetic from that business. This could leave a business with no
One of the major issues that support animal testing is the fact that it has been used successfully in history to develop cures and treatments for diseases which killed human being in large numbers. The following are examples of illnesses and viruses that were cured through the use of animal testing : the development of Penicillin was primarily based on the testing of the Penicillin drugs on mice,
Reference (Understandinganimalresearch.org.uk, 2014) • 71 of the noble prizes won in the last 100 years have been awarded to scientists who have used animals in their research for medicine. Reference (Pro-test.org.uk, 2014) There’s no denying that there are pros and cons to using animals for testing which you can see above, and that’s only scratching the surface. Below is a case study which shows what happens when products are not tested before being put out on the market. If these products where tested on animals beforehand would we have saved all these lives?
It gives animals no rights or wills. The animals do not have a say in this, they don’t say “Hey, please don’t kill me”. Even if they could i’m sure the scientists would not listen at all and continue to torture the animal. Some people think much more differently than me. Many say “but it would be safe to not test on humans, animals have no souls, they are treated very well in the cages.”.