Standardized education is a practice that has been present in our current system of education for approximately one to two centuries. As such, many elements of the education system do not “play nicely” with many of the values held outside of “school life” today, such as the values presented in our schools that belong in an age of industrial factory workers, where following directives exactly as provided was critical to success. Additionally, as there are unique variations between two different students, standardized education may jeopardize the learning potential for particular students that need specialized learning environments in order to best take advantage of their time. A major shift in standardized education practices needs to occur, …show more content…
According to an article by John Baker of The Huffington Post, “...How to create, how to invent, how to solve a problem, how to continually learn...” are skills that employers of modern organizations will be looking for and that should be nurtured from an early age. However, from an early age, we are taught the opposite; how to conform to a standard of what is “normal”. Creativity has become an increasingly crucial skill in the modern working world, but with a number of notable exceptions (such as Gifted and Talented and Advanced Placement (AP) classes), this crucial skill is not taught and nurtured from an early age. Rather, you are simply told to “do what you’re told to do”. Rather, you are simply told to “listen to the adult” and that the adult has a higher amount of knowledge than students at all times. Learning to be creative and “talking back” when it is necessary (such as an unfair employer) will help many students immensely and are skills that need to both be nurtured and kept in moderation at an early age rather than simply following directives exactly as they are provided. The current method of teaching students values other than creativity, such as earning respect and giving it also needs to be improved to provide motivation to adhere to those beneficial values outside of school and their educational careers. From creativity to …show more content…
The argument supporting a shift in schedule modularity isn’t that it should be introduced as an option immediately, but rather, the student should be provided an introduction to the subject for his/her early grade levels before stepping up to higher education and coordinating with parents to skip the course for something of a higher amount of benefit to the student. Others argue that many kids don’t have aspirations for their future career and that it would jeopardize their education to switch to this type of non-standardized system. The issue with this argument is, however, that many students do have aspirations and are being somewhat restricted from reaching their full learning potential in attempting to standardized and accommodate the “lowest common denominator” in one system. For those who don’t have aspirations, classes offered in the current system of standardized education with the same curriculum should be offered as a choice with the addition of classes/sessions providing further guidance to students who do not have aspirations for their future career to help them find a passion that they can focus on in their education.
Although many valid reasons exist for the continuation of standardized education/curriculum as a practice, many of the values and practices held in
Mr. Eric Maisel once said “Creativity is not a talent or ability. It is the fruit of a person’s decision to matter.” In his book, “Become a Creativity Coach Now!,” Mr. Maisel has written countless books and articles on how one does not need to have a certain ability or talent to achieve things. In his article, “The Smart Gap” published in Psychology Today, he talks about how a person doesn’t have to be the smartest person in the world to achieve things. Eric Maisel manages to talk about the subject of not being as smart as other people in a way that makes you understand and want to try better, but it also makes you feel bad about yourself.
One of the biggest concerning the need for an increase in rigor in instruction in American schools. She discusses that in Poland students must stay in academic classes for an extra year and teachers are paid bonuses to engage in professional development work. She also notes that in Finland they “rebooted their teacher-training colleges, forcing them to become much more selective and rigorous.” In an article written by Sarah Tantillio on Only Good Books, she recognizes the validity of these statements, but comments that in America “the Common Core States Standards, which most states have adopted, they are definitely rigorous, But how they are implemented (and assessed) from state to state and school to school is still a Very Big Question.” Further in her article she points out the large population differences between Finland, Poland, and the United States, and how this affects our education system.
Lack of Creativity in Education Creativity and abstract thinking are seen as the basis of education, but more and more, these skills are being lost, and even discouraged, in the classroom. Fourteen-year-old Line Dalile, in her essay, “How Schools are Killing Creativity,” uses rhetorical strategies such as metaphors, ethos, and rhetorical questions to strengthen her claim on how schools are discouraging creativity in the classroom. Dalile uses a bold metaphor at the beginning of the article that strongly introduces her ideas on creativity in education. The metaphor is as follows,“.. it is destroying our fascinating, curious minds.”
Teach. Test. Repeat. This is the simplified modification of teaching being done in a high school now-a-days. “We are going to take a pop-quiz,” are words that most probably will not be spoken in a real-life job after college is over.
Common Core is the new standard of teaching in schools implemented by the federal government. State education chiefs and governors developed a set of standards that they believe students should know after each grade, so they are prepared for college or a job after high school. But are these standards fair for everyone? Not everyone learns at the same speed and some students require special attention.
The United States Common Core State Standards for Education The Common Core State Standards is a controversial subject among educators, parents and general public. What most people do not realize is state standards have been around since the 1900’S, and every state has had their own standards in the early 2000’s. Each state standard has levels or benchmarks, which state what the student should be proficient in per grade level. Most of these standards are in place for third grade through high school.
Ungar says, “What seemed a radical idea in business education 10 years or so ago- that critical and creative thinking is as “relevant” as finance or accounting- is now commonplace.” (Ungar, 2017, p. 228) The work industry constantly adapts to the world, so, it is crucial to have employees equipped with the skills to understand those changes not only from a stateside perspective, but also from a foreign perspective. Once employers do this, they can apply these changes to their job force. Ideas, that once seemed impossible, now seem ordinary in modern time.
Introduction Conducting educational standards is very imperative when dispensing an effective learning environment for students. Educational standards are normally defined as principles and skills students should retain throughout their educational career as students. These values that students obtain are served as a basis of educational reform across the state, common core values, and nation as educators and stakeholders rejoin the call for a clear definition of desired outcomes of schooling. Educational standards also exemplifies a way to measure student success in terms of these outcomes" (National Research Council 2001). National, state and local (common core) educators plays a significant role in improving students’ learning environment
Resolved: On balance, standardized testing is beneficial to K-12 education in the United States. Attention getter: Last year, districts in Philadelphia had a $0 budget for books. At the same time, a quarter of a percent of America’s education budget, several billions of dollars, was spent on standardized testing.
Meredith Broussard explains how standardized testing does not prove a child’s general knowledge nor creative in-depth thinking by stating, “Standardized tests are not based on general knowledge... they are based on specific knowledge contained in specific sets of books: the textbooks created by the test makers” (Broussard). Miner also states that standardized testing, “... leads to a dumbed-down curriculum that values rote memorization over in-depth thinking, exacerbates inequities for low-income students and students of color, and undermines true accountability among schools, parents, and community” (Miner). The assessment of a child should encourage a child to want to learn for the sake of learning. Alternative assessments could address a child’s development and learning process. These evaluations can determine why children are more likely to read behind grade level, instead of highlighting their inabilities.
Standardized testing has become one of the most popular types of testing in U.S. public schools to date. Students take numerous standardized tests throughout their childhood schooling. (Studies show that a typical student takes an average of 112 mandated standardized tests between Pre-K and 12th grade.) While standardized testing is one of the main procedures that Universities use to judge incoming students, it is not proven to be the most effective way to convey a student’s actual intelligence level. The U.S. should not focus so heavily on standardized testing because it is not a complete accurate measurement of a student’s intelligence.
Student’s name Professor’s Name Course Date Successful use of Rhetorical Strategies Introduction Ken Robinson delivers a TED talk on “schools kill creativity” filmed in February 2006. The talk aims to challenge the education system and the fact that it has little emphasis on the creativity of individuals. Robinson notes that children should not only be made to pursue their studies but also follow their passions and their interests which lie in their talents.
Summary: This chapter focus on goals, objectives, standards, and learning targets. This chapter talks about state and local educational standards (standards, what a student should know or perform). This chapter also talks about CCS, The Common Core Standards and now it is used to determine the standards and goals in each school district. Lastly, it summarizes the different types of assessments, along with why we should include criteria in learning standards.
Ken Robinson successfully convinces his intended audience that even though literacy is understood as being more important in schools over creativity it is not more important they should be treated as equal. Ken Robinson is a well-known professor, writer, and public speaker (Robinson, "Do school's kill creativity?). Sir Ken Robinson makes an entertaining and profoundly moving case for creating an education system that nurtures
Those ideas may be seen in their daily life or even in work. Creativity is a requirement for several well-paid jobs like physicist, music, drama teacher, or astronomer, therefore being creative helps the children a lot in getting a pleasing job. (Loudenback, 2016) A