The Texas Voter ID Law was put passed in 2011 and implemented in 2013.The law states that in order to vote each citizen must present one of the seven forms of identification. Any of the following would be considered an acceptable form of identification: Texas driver license, Texas personal identification card, a Texas Election identification certificate, Texas concealed handgun license, a United States passport, a United state military identification card that has the person’s photo, and a United States citizenship certificate that has the person’s photo. I believe that the Texas Voter ID Law is consistent with the federal standards, the law will not affect the voter turnout by much in Texas, and I do think that requiring a photo ID to vote is a good policy. The U.S. Constitution and federal laws place limits on the state’s power to establish …show more content…
I also do not find this law to harm any citizen. Each citizen of age should already have an identification card, and if they do not have one they can register for a free voter identification card. There is a possibility that the number of democratic voters may decrease because some democratic citizens are categorized as minorities. Although this may not be true, for instance in places such as Indiana and Georgia, democratic voter rates increased after the passing of a Voter ID Law. With this law not only can we prevent voter fraud, but also we can motivate the citizens in Texas to get an identification card and push them to vote. Citizens who already have an identification card may feel that it is their duty to vote, which can raise the voter rate in Texas. I feel that this law is not discriminating; it is just preventing voter fraud from occurring. As a minority, I do not feel that this law is discriminating me from voting instead I feel motivated to vote because as a citizen of the United States I can make a
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
In the article” Texas to Rewrite Voter ID Education Materials” the article is very important especially the citizens of United state to encourage them about the change in the voting system this coming November election 2016. One of the significant points that I figured out from the article is about how the government has spend all most 2.5 million dollars in educating the citizen about voting which I see that the right of every citizen of this country is very important for the government. One of this important of educating the citizen about voting is letting them know that they are required to present their photo ID before they will be able to vote in the Election Day this help me to understand the textbook content about agent of socialization
Recently, state-issued photo ID has been required in order vote since the law passed in the Texas legislature. This law has caused controversy as it brings up the question over the state’s power in the regulation of elections. “While pending review within the judicial system, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Shelby County v. Holder, which effectively ended all pending litigation. As a result, voters are now required to present an approved form of photo identification in order to vote in all Texas Elections” (votetexas.gov). The U.S. Supreme Court struck down on Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in the Shelby County v. Holder case.
The argument for compulsory voting is basically undemocratic because the first amendment talks about how you have freedom. The freedom of choice must include the freedom not to choose. Democracy deeply values individual freedom which means if compulsory voting was mandatory, It is a clear violation of liberty and the first amendment. I argue that voting should not be mandatory in America because first, non-voters are uninformed, it doesn’t improve the democratic climate, and it requires a national database. American is one of the most powerful and big countries in the world.
The Texas legislative process is governed by the Texas constitution as well as the House of Representative and the Senate. Its primary function is to enact laws to provide for the health, welfare, education, environment, and economic and general well-being of the citizens of Texas. It also establishes public policy through the passage of bills and resolutions and proposes amendments to the state constitution, which are then submitted to the voters for approval or disapproval. When a bill is proposed, it must go through the legislative process before it becomes a law. The legislative process is very long and has many steps.
The removal of this right dehumanizes prisoners. The streets of Texas are filled with blue or white collar criminals on bail or simply waiting for their sentence. Presently, if individual are found guilty of a crime, but they are not given a judicial sentence they are still allowed to vote; why should there be treated differently from convicted criminals who are locked up? However, allowing prisoners to vote while in prison would increase voting turnout and also Texas would gain the reputation of becoming one of the two states that allow prisoners to vote while in prison.
The state of Texas has a fast growing Hispanic demographic group. When Hispanics do go out and vote they normally tend to vote democratic. Hispanics have lower voting rates than the white population does due to the Hispanic population having a lower income. Not only do they have lower income but this population itself has a higher percentage rate of young voters. As I have stated before Texas has a huge Hispanic population, which has a great
It has allowed people to go and vote and not have to worry about voter fraud. According to the “Students Challenge Texas Voter ID Law in Court” article, 83% of the registered voters in Texas have agreed and supported this law (Rhodan M). Although the law has been in full motion for a couple years, I believe that the voter turnout will stay below the average number and will continue to for as long as the law stays in place. The reason I believe this will happen is because voters want to just go in and vote and then leave. Most people will say that there is, in short, absolutely no evidence that we have a problem that need’s solving, and yet here we have the Republican Party, the party that purports to just hate bureaucracy and intrusive big government and wasteful spending demanding that we spend tens of millions expanding the bureaucratic burden on ordinary citizens, taking down names and addresses all to solve a problem that doesn’t exist.
I feel that in any other state, applying the new voter ID law would not have as big an impact as it would in Texas. Since Texas has such a huge population of immigrants trying to get their citizenship it limits many people that make up the majority of the population. According to the Texas voter data for the 2014 November election, out of 14,025,441 registered voters only 4,727,208 were recorded in the turnout amount. So, based off of this information I can assume that applying this law to Texas could significantly affect the voter turnout negatively. Being that Texas has such a low voter turnout rate, I feel that the voter ID law should not be applied mainly because of the issues with the ethnicity background of our population.
Making this assumption is true about having them vote for the rest of their lives because they will be able to exercise this right many ways with local elections and being able to share their opinions with this new right. This goes to show that the Montgomery County is hopeful in the new change they are making. In the article Shin goes on to talk about Jessica Carpenter (Takoma City Clerk) and how she “estimates that about 90 16- and 17-year-olds have registered to vote.” Even though it is a small turnout of these new voters, it will bring a better understanding of opinions in the
“ While compulsion of any kind is a restriction, so is the compulsion to drive only on the right side of the road.” ( “Is It Time To Consider Mandatory Voting Laws? Worsening Voting Statistics Make a Strong Case.” by John W. Dean.) One way voter turnout can increase is by compulsory (required) voting.
Throughout the recent years the majority of the able voting population are exercising their privilege to vote. Even during the presidential elections the voter turnout rate was 50% or less than that. The act of voting should be a personal responsibility of every citizen meaning it should be a obligation. But to specify on this statement, it should not lawfully required to vote because people also have the right not to vote too (and it would be weakening personal liberties) , but it should be a personal responsibility for citizens if they are to complain about how the government run rather than every citizen. A personal responsibility is when we are the cause of our own actions.
This unfamiliarity and thought of the process being confusing deters the younger people from registering to vote in the first place. By removing this process, voters can just show up to cast their votes and move on with their day without worrying about this potentially confusing process. These three methods combined could increase the voter turnout for each
Texas is the second most populated and second largest state in United State. Due to its size, Texas contains diverse landscapes that resemble both American South and Southwest. Most of the population centers are located in areas of formers prairies, grass lands, forests, and the coastline. The current Texas Constitution was adopted in 1876. Like most of the states, it also provides for a separation off power.
Second, anyone who is caught committing voter fraud will be punished severely. This includes attempting to fraudulently get an ID, attempting to vote under someone else’s name, or any other kind of voter fraud. Consequences will include being banned from voting or holding any government office forever, potentially a fine or jail time. Requiring photo ID to vote is a highly debated topic on both the national and state level. Many argue that voter ID would go against the freedoms listed in the constitution.
This group of people are less likely to have identification for some unfortunate reason. The law also effects the trust that people have in the voting system. People feel that if the system is not set up to be fair they will not participate. There are only six states that have a strict voter id requirement which include Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Wisconsin, South Carolina Texas and Tennessee (Underhill, 2017). In these states there is an issue of discrimination against minorities.