Universal Design (UD) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) have been gaining new ground when institutions and faculty are designing spaces and courses to be the most accessible to all students. UD focuses on reducing physical barriers (Hamraie, 2016). UDL focuses more on the course design to various means of representation the material, student expression of learning, and student engagements in the material (Beck Wells, 2022; Bedrossian, 2018; Black et al., 2015). Studies have shown that UD and UDL improve learning for all students and can reduce the time commitment of getting accommodations (Bedrossian, 2018; Grillo, 2022). Is Universal Design (for Learning) (UD/L) sufficient for the success of higher education students, especially disabled …show more content…
UDL considers the learning needs of students when planning curriculum, which removes discriminatory practices as educators consider various learning styles, language differences, neurodivergence (diagnosed or not), and other students that would benefit from varying strategies (Beck Wells, 2022). Mitigating barriers before they become problematic can help students focus on the material instead of the barriers. For disabled students, they would not need to worry about if the space is physically accessible or if the material presentation will allow for understanding.
As UDL eliminates beforehand, it can address systemic barriers within the curriculum such as the standardized goals, methods of teaching, assessment of learning, and learning materials (Bradshaw, 2020). Educators can create a curriculum that all students can access while still achieving learning requirements (Bradshaw, 2020). Early planning of curriculum allows educators to consider their students and create a plan that will result in success and learning for all. Students that would have needed accommodations before UD/L would not need them as those accommodations would be incorporated into the class
…show more content…
Formal requirements for equality are not guaranteed to create change and give access in the ways needed (Hamraie, 2016). Designing a course without knowing the students and their specific needs, there may still be gaps in having the best success of student learning. UD has changed meaning from the initial concepts of creating spaces for those with disabilities and assumes that higher education is in a post-disability era where being disabled or the disability identity does not matter (Hamraie, 2016). Educators should learn about disabilities and how disabled students learn to better plan courses following the UD/L principles. Without understanding disability, educators cannot teach disabled students
There are a various people prejudicially placed into classrooms for students with disabilities because of their race, gender culture/ethnicity, social class, gender and sexual orientation. The way a person identifies occasionally determines if they will be assigned in a class for students with disabilities. David J. Conner discusses Michael’s story, a participant researcher who was placed in a class for students with disabilities; some factors that contributed to the Michael being labeled as disabled is his race and class. Connor came to a realization that there appears to be a high number black and Latino students in classrooms for students with disabilities and he explores some of the reasons through Michael’s story.
Students with disabilities feel more at home in inclusive learning environments when cultural differences are acknowledged and valued. To provide a welcoming and respectful learning environment, educators must actively work to comprehend the various cultural practices, beliefs, and values. I completely agree with this idea because it is critical for educators to be aware of the cultural origins and identities of their students since this can have a beneficial effect on how well they learn. Bialka also emphasizes the necessity of cooperation between multicultural and special education. By combining these two disciplines, educators may address the confluence of culture and disability, ensuring that students with disabilities from all backgrounds receive the assistance and accommodations they need.
Lavancia Lindo, I concur specific learners does need additional help in achieving literacy. Moreover, important multiple resources are available for students with disabilities considering their challenges. Therefore, educators will adhere to individual’s constitutional rights when distinctive issues arise.
Richer Milner IV, Author of Start Where You Are, But Don’t Stay There: Understanding Diversity, Opportunity Gaps, and Teaching in Today’s Classroom, believes that there are students placed in this program for two reasons: Teachers don’t want to deal with them or don’t know how to be responsive to them. Therefore, special education should not be blame for the disproportion or to be seen as a program to discriminate students because of their
Many students have learning disabilities that can affect them in many ways weather being writing focusing on a task at hand, standing up to people, talking backwards, having to make things perfect and many more. But there can be a disadvantage to all that. Having certain learning disabilities can be treated unfairly in certain schools like being separated from kids that might help them, or being treated like little children. When in reality being with “normal” kids might help them more.sometimes their needs are met and sometimes they are not. Which that is what this report is all about.
Some people argue special education segregates the students. Having access to educational services isn’t enough. There are different views on the implication of special education, but emphasizing individual educational benefits for all students is a worthy
(2010). Differentiating instruction for disable students in inclusive classroom Another article written by Broderick, Meta-Parekb, & Reid, (2010) contemplated on the inclusive education the US is providing to students irrespective of race, abilities, color or gender into the public school system. As the need for integration is asserted so as not to marginalized students with disabilities, still one could possibly identified that there are still segregation happening in schools as there are special instructions and classrooms for disabled students are implemented in the system. The authors are particularly emphatic in the use of differentiating instructions inside the classrooms till everyone understands.
Now that what I have learned from SED 125 has been dicussed, I’ll move to how this all changed how I think now. When I learned about the impact ableism has on people within a society that have a disability it really interested me. I took the knowledge that I learned about ableism and created a Civic Engagement letter for my First Year Seminar. I created a letter that address three different school districts RSU 40, RSU 13, and RSU 28 Special Education Departments, about bringing some alleviation of the ill effecfs of discrimination. The letter states that with the new knowledge I learned of UDL and Inclusive Education may allow teachers and faculty members alike to stop and think before they become the “ Tiny Tims or the Super Crips” in an educational society and create an environment of striving for fullest potential of each child.
Human service teachers who adhere to standard 38 are dedicated to the ideals of accessibility and inclusion and make every effort to make education accessible to students with disabilities. Human service educators adhere to high academic standards in their scholarship, pedagogy, and professional service. Additionally, they participate in professional associations, attend workshops and conferences, and review and/or conduct research to stay up to date on the most recent developments in their field. In exercises like case material, awards, studios, exploration, distributions, and other related exercises, standard 40 human assistance teachers recognize the commitments that understudies make to the instructor's work. Human service teachers in standard 41 keep an eye on students' field experiences to make sure the placement site, supervisory experience, and learning experience are up to par with students' goals for personal, professional, academic, career, and civic
Summary Shakela Bryant is special education teacher for middle school grades sixth through eighth at Carrington Middle School in Durham, North Carolina. This is Ms. Bryant’s third year at Carrington and her fourth year teaching. Ms. Bryant is an inclusion (co-teacher) and resource 6th grade teacher. An inclusion teacher provides support to students’ with disability in the general education setting. As an inclusion teacher, Ms. Bryant takes turns teaching English/Language Arts (ELA) with the three general education teachers she has been assigned to and also carries out other duties.
After completing the class activity, writing to the able-bodied person, I started to reflect on my privilege of being an able-bodied. “People with disabilities have been a hidden, misunderstood minority, often routinely deprived of the basic life choices that even the most disadvantaged among us take for granted” (Shaprio, 1994, p. 7). I have never focus on people with disabilities experiencing oppression. My privilege for my entire life has blinded me with all the advantages I have as an able-bodied. Needs that I take for granted are the same needs others are deprived from.
Why is it important that students with disabilities have access to the general education curriculum? What are some ways to help these students to access the general education curriculum? If students are limited to only a resource room for their educational experience they run the risk of receiving a narrowed curriculum reduced to practice of individual skills. Exclusion from general education classrooms may also result in lowered expectations because students are not exposed to peers with skills that they are working towards learning.
I feel comfortable with my knowledge of disabilities and their educational considerations, but I worry about my ability to implement, especially in a general classroom. I fear having to severely differentiate instruction for students with special needs while still providing a lesson fitting the educational needs of the general classroom. I also worry about my ability to identify students with special needs. I know identification is a multi-layered, multi-person procedure, but I worry that I will mix up struggling students with students with special needs. So with these fears in mind, my goals are to practice creating lesson plans that include differentiation for students with special needs and to learn more about the identification process through observation and interviews.
The failure to implement full inclusion appropriately has numerous detrimental effects on the parties involved. One disadvantage for full inclusion is that the socialization part precedes the academic component, notwithstanding the fact that it should not be the primary goal of education. Inclusion movements aim to make disabled students look normal, overlooking the issue of whether they are undertaking educational programs or not. This can have a negative effect on the academic progress of students with disabilities because important skills are not taught for the sake of the learner making physical presence in a full inclusion classroom. Fox (2013) claims that there is a need for disabled students to reap maximum benefits from this integration.
Henry Ford once said, “Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress. Working together is success” (Brainy Quote). From here, the concept of inclusive education, including students with and without learning disabilities as peers in the same classroom, originated. The aim of this type of education is to get students with learning disabilities involved in the society. Teachers and fellow students will also provide help for students with disabilities; in this way, students with learning disabilities will be motivated to study as they feel that they are a part of a group instead of being isolated in special places.