State-sponsored terrorism Essays

Terrorism is defined by the group or actor that is perpetrating the act. These specific goals and purposes, as well as the perpetrator’s place of domicile and the location of the specific attack, determine how terrorism is to be classified. State-sponsored, international, religious, and dissident terrorism are all defined by these standards, and examples of each type hinge on these variances. The US Department of State proscribes state-sponsored terrorism to refer to any state that has “repeatedly

defines state sponsored-terrorism as an official government that supports policies of violence, repression, and intimidation when it is an act committed against an enemy of the state. They pursue such policies by using or creating “unofficial” groups through monetary means to commit a heinous act against an individual or group that is deemed an enemy of the state. (Martin, 71) There are two types of terrorism committed by the state. That of state assistance for terrorism and the other of state patronage

Introduction Terrorism is a phenomenon that has developed fairly recently in human history. Especially in the recent decade (2010-present) we have seen a massive surge in terrorist activity in the world and online. The United States hit a turning point after 9/11 that would change our security procedures and laws forever. With the current threats of ISIS and state sponsored terrorism, the need for discussion about terrorism is paramount. This paper aims to establish what terrorism is and provide

President of the United States FROM: SUBJECT: Counterterrorism Policies DATE: Introduction After the infamous 9/11 terrorist attacks, the U.S. has continued to experience violent and ideological terrorism, especially from Islam affiliated terrorists. For instance, in the recent past, various parts of the U.S. have witnessed terrorist attacks, such as the indiscriminate and hate perpetuated shootings that occurred in Orlando. Consequently, combating terrorism and violent extremism is among

Chicago, and Georgetown. Teaching, acting, and writing for over 60 years as a policy advisor in three continents, he has focused on the field of twentieth century politics and history (Farwick, 2010). Mr. Laqueur stated that, “History shows that terrorism more often than not has little political impact, and that when it has an effect it is often the opposite of the one desired. (Laqueur, 1996).” This statement will be the theoretical framework for this paper. I will apply this theory to ideological

Similarities & Differences Between Napoleon & Stalin George Orwell’s Animal Farm is a famous novel written about the life and times of a group of animals living on a farm and fighting for their survival and a new way of life. The pigs in this story become the main leaders while all the other characters obey and fear them. The story is an allegory to the then rise of Joseph Stalin, an influential and evil communist leader. The character ‘Napoleon’ the pig in George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm is an

Social Disorganization Theory Name Institutional Affiliation Crime in our societies is a widespread social phenomenon dating back centuries ago and ranges from low-level delinquencies to high-level offences. Chances are high that one would be involved in crime during their lifetime, either as a victim, or as an assailant. Nevertheless, what really motivates individuals to commit crime? Studies have shown that in different political, economic, and cultural backgrounds, crime occurs in diverse

A. PREAMBLE The terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 has sparked intense curiosity and interest in the world especially the West to learn and investigate the religion of Islam. The Muslim people are portrayed as violent and barbaric, and Islam as oppressive and antithesis to human rights values. Thus, escalation of public opinion about Islam has encouraged debates and forums, and also stirred demonstrations and movements which have compelled the Muslims to speak out their minds and interpret and

Political and Economic Factors Leibenow (1969) traced the historical development of Liberia and the method of governance as factors in the national conflict in the Liberian society. Similarly, Sawyer (1996) observed that even the motto inscribed on Liberia’s official coat of arms, The Love of Liberty Brought Us Here, excluded the Africans who were living on the land before the settlers arrived. Such exclusions of the Africans from government employment and taxation without representation greatly

The Crucible: How Fear Changes People During his first Inaugural Address, Franklin D. Roosevelt once announced, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself”. Fear manipulates a persons rationality resulting in them behaving in ways they normally would not, especially in the story The Crucible written by Arthur Miller. The characters in The Crucible allow fear to manipulate their beliefs and actions. They all know what is right, but fear alters their mindset causing them to act differently. Therefore

Religion, and the morality associated to it, constitutes the core of many of William Gladstone’s speeches. Colonialism leads to violence, he explains, l.18: “Sometimes they may be not without bloodshed; sometimes they are not made without a threat of bloodshed.” This is a fact impossible to deny. But violence, in most human societies, needs justification. As Mr Gladstone’s explains, the British kingdom denies its culpability, its “fault” (L.19). The fault lies on “those people”, meaning the colonised

United States and Europe taking the natural resources out of Africa. Imperialism is represented in the picture because it shows how the more powerful countries extend their influence to get Africa’s resources and just take all the resources for themselves. Also, it shows how Africa did not gain anything when

off as a beautiful normal day, but within only a few hours, the whole street went to chaos, fear, and distrust. First you need to know that that the United States was scared of communism at the time

topics of terrorism and torture. Is it possible to justify and defend such acts? In the chapter “Terrorism: A Critique of Excuses”, author Michael Walzer shuts down four excuses that attempt to justify terrorism. In the chapter, “Should the Ticking Bomb Terrorist Be Tortured?”, Alan Dershowitz defends his theory that it is necessary to torture a terrorist if that means saving the lives of innocent people while protecting their civil liberties and human rights at the same time. Terrorism can never

hacking by a nation or a state, to conduct attacks on the strategic or tactical resources of the nation or state’s target. Cyber warfare is going to target any sensitive industry in the opponent's infrastructure. This means that the military, defense and weapons manufacturers, the civilian factories that make weapons, mines, and the national power grid that gives all of the above its necessary electricity. In other words, cyber warfare is the actions of a nation or a state to penetrate another nation's

Frederick Douglass once said “The thing worse than rebellion is the thing that causes rebellion”. Change, how important is it? Important enough to give up your life? Your family? Everything? When the answer is yes, we rebel. We risk our lives, our families, and everything. In the novel The Kingdom of This World, the Haitian people are willing to risk everything to gain equal treatment; the torment and destruction they cause is only justified by the terror of their lives as they are. In the film Moolaade

The discussion of torture is a touchy one in regards to its place in the justice system. People struggle to find a place for it between what is morally right and what is realistically necessary. In the state that the world is in today, due to frequent terror attacks, the topic is more crucial and controversial than ever before. In Michael Levin’s “A Case for Torture”, he presents his beliefs on how accommodations can be made for torture in order to uphold the safety and well-being of the world. Levin’s

to Nechayev. Nechayev felt that Ivanov no longer benefitted his cause, and was a threat to his authority. Referring back to Nechayev’s “Catechism of the Revolutionist,” it was justifiable to discard Ivanov from the Russian Revolutionary Committee. Nechayev stated, “the organization had the moral right to take the life of any of its members” (Nechayev 72). Nechayev conspired with three other members to murder Ivanov by beating him, then throwing Ivanov carcass in a pond (Yarmolinsky 159). This act

Persepolis proves that a stereotype of “fundamentalism, fanaticism, and terrorism” is dispelled by learning of the average citizen. Satrapi addresses this in Persepolis by using herself and multiple characters in the book. In America you grow up hearing that the middle eastern people are all terrorist, that statement becomes embedded into your brain. This book shows there is way more to the story that we don 't get on the news. The citizens’ stories need to be told too, because they are the ones

main culprit for enforcing such strict, yet unsuccessful, safety standards is the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). The Administration was created as a post 9/11 policy to react to American citizen’s concern about the threat of airline terrorism. The creation