Although an innumerable amount of students may disagree, having random locker searches are an exquisite idea. Some parents think that it is an invasion of privacy, other parents feel that it teaches structure. Nobody should be against locker searches, unless they have something to ensconce. The first reason why a multifold of students would like random locker searches to be implemented into their school policy. A multitudinous number of students desire random searches to be performed, because many of them conclude that it would make their school feel exceptionally safer. A locker is the perfect size for a small concealable weapon or firearm. Thanks to random searches being performed in schools across the United States, a bounteous number of …show more content…
Students yearn to be able to feel safe at school. Local courts have deemed locker searches as legal. Lockers are school property, so schools should have free reign to search students lockers. If locker searches are performed, it could prevent bullying. Locker searches could be beneficial to the school. if the locker is damaged and no search was performed on that locker, than they would not know who caused the damage. If they do perform locker searches, they could find damage that was concealed or hidden. Although quite a few students support random locker searches, other students have their reasons for opposing the idea of random locker searches. Numerous students feel that the school administrators do not trust them, and that is why they perform the locker searches. However, in most cases that is not the truth. Most of the time parents believe that it should not be legal to search their child’s locker, so it all comes down to legal issues with the school. Parents believe that hiring staff to perform locker searches is a waste of precious money and time. Although there are many different views on performing random locker searches, there are many good supporting claims from both sides. Maybe the debate over performing locker searches will be settled
Saltillo High School no longer assigns lockers to students, but it should. Students will often have multiple books and binders to carry home every day in their bags resulting in a sore back and shoulders from the strain of the heavy backpack. The lockers are already in place, so allowing the students to use them would not cost the school any money. There really is no reason why the students should not be able to have access to them.
Teachers should not be armed in schools because the could not handle a real situation, and the liability is too much of a risk. To elaborate, it is widely agreed that a student’s well-being is a teacher’s concern. For six to eight hours every day for 5 days a week, the life of the student is in the teacher’s hands. However, a teacher has never been expected to arm themself to protect a student until now.
There is a possibility that a kid who is planning a shooting could just be in a classroom and find out were his/her teacher keeps the weapon, and they wouldn 't even have to sneak a gun in. That’s a downside but what if we made gun safes that only opened with a teachers ID or own password making it almost impossible for a student to open it. Conclusion By arming teachers there are alot more positives than negatives, Yes bad things can happen with a deadly weapon in a classroom but people will continue to do these horrific crimes knowing there is hardly anything that’s going to stop them.
When many people are behind that thought it may be difficult to change their minds into having weapons inside a school. The schools can be prepared, but there is always someone that is going to outsmart their system or know the system then they would win. If plans were based off of the layout of schools it will be harder for people to outsmart the system (Cummings). Making new plans at schools will take way too long to complete and it will create a weakness in the schools. Even though making a new plan may take a long time it is the best option to prevent school
Historically speaking, student searches came about in response to schools such as Columbine, Jonesboro, West Paducah, Pearl, Littleton, and Springfield 's sudden acts of violence at these schools. Schools and communities use these methods typically use the best search policies are developed by school boards who work collaboratively with local law enforcement officials, local judges, attorneys, school staff, community members to keep the school safe and maintaining the survival of the school. In the article by Kate R. Ehlenberger, Assistant Executive Director, Commonwealth Educational policy institute
Metal Detectors for Schools School safety is always a major concern that is an important aspect for the adults and students. In history, various situations such as the Columbine shooting have raised concerns involving weapons on campuses that result in injuries or even death. A solution that some have implemented is the addition of metal detectors. However, schools should not install metal detectors because they require money and supervision, can be avoided to allow weapon entry, and alter the feel of a school environment negatively for the students.
” This is important because if the students are aware of the teacher’s possession then the risks of wrongdoing and mental disasters will definitely
But when a school is not safe, that can interfere with the student 's academics. There have been many instances of danger in schools in the past, that has led to tragedies. An answer to this dilemma is the use of metal detectors. They are effective and increase safety that can assist in ending violence in school environments. To prevent violence from happening again in schools, metal detectors should be installed in every public
For this reason, security professionals believe that arming students shoot back would actually make matters worse in the extremely rare instances where mass shootings occur on campus.” This can create a bigger problem than the one before. Such accidental shootings are not accountable for which leaves families of innocent victims upset and frustrated because justice is never served. According to The Campaign to Keep Guns off Campus “Despite the horrific shootings at Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois, college campuses are far safer than the communities that surround them. Ninety three percent of the violence against college students occurs off campus, where guns are widely available.
Teachers did not go into their profession to be babysitters, and they certainly didn 't go into it to be security guards. Now society is trying to force them to be both. How anyone could possibly secure those weapons so that students could never obtain them would be a nightmare- and unrealistic? And to think that if a school full of teenagers can access a weapon in every classroom that violence would decrease is absurd. There are many negatives to teachers owning guns such as: cost of training and weapons, teachers turning against their students, and keeping teacher who has the gun a secret.
An alternative route schools can take is instead of having locker searches, they can get metal detectors to prevent weapons such as guns/knives and/or drugs being on school property. It would be just effective as locker searches. It also ensures that nobody gets hurt and if someone decides to bring a weapon to school they can stop it at the door instead of waiting for someone to get hurt, then taking action. It’s less likely for students to sneak in harmful things that can put themselves or others in
In order to nurture a healthy learning environment at America’s schools and universities, it is critical that students as well as faculty feel safe on campus. Recent pandemonium of violent crimes on campus has many pro-gun activists suggesting that both the Students and Teachers should be allowed to carry concealed weapons on
When one hears "school security" these days, the word that goes with it is "tighten." Indeed, given both external threats and unruly (sometimes violent) student behavior, it makes sense to think that the most sensible course of action is to err on the side of more stringent measures, harsher sanctions and less permissive administration. It largely comes down to liability - whenever an individual with a history of troubled or criminal behavior snaps or becomes involved in an incident severe enough to attract government or media attention, many of the questions asked in the aftermath are variations on "why was this person not in jail. " The same applies to schools, where administrators often end up having to justify themselves to parents and
School safety is a very controversial topic in the U.S. There are many cases of people questioning the safety of schools. Recent school shootings raised concerns over school safety. While this has received a lot of attention, other things such as drugs, ara problem in schools. Even teachers have spoken out about the lack of safety of their schools.
It would make schools a safer place, it makes it so people can intervene before the police get there, and show that American’s staff and students are responsible enough to carry on college campuses. Think about college campus carry what it could do for the future. References Common Arguments Against Campus Carry. (n.d.). Retrieved April 17, 2017, from http://concealedcampus.org/common-arguments/#5 Flock, E. (2013, June 25).