“Healthy school lunch means students are getting the nourishment they need to power their minds and bodies to learn.”-Unknown. This quote is relevant because students need good, healthy food to be able to focus in class. When the students have eaten a good healthy food they won’t be worrying about when they’re going to get their next meal. The food needs to actually look edible for kids to even think about eating it. Children go home sick because of the low quality lunches. If the school really cares about the welfare of their students, making a change to what they eat is a great start. Finally, don’t feed students’ food that someone wouldn’t eat themselves.
Imagine a school cafeteria with delicious food, healthy lunches, and all on a small budget. Now imagine that same cafeteria but with not delicious, not nutritious food, and tons of money wasted. Which would you choose? Unfortunately, prairie elementary school’s cafeteria is much like the latter. Both the taste and nutritional value of this food is very bad. Also, too much money is spent on these half eaten lunches. This really needs to change.
To start off, what if I asked if you have ever felt that your school provided lunch wasn’t all that great? If I had asked a student, chances are they’d say that they don’t eat their school lunch by choice. But we’re just seventh graders that don’t know a lot of what really goes on when it comes to our lunches, so I intend to show you some research that I found from credible sources that proves that school lunches need to change.
I think this because it is not serving a purpose. I do not think that the school should spend money on a whole new source of food. In some cases it does not make sense to change the menu if the school is still going to sell cookies, chips, ice cream, and unhealthy juices. I think the school should just stick to having regular lunches. Secondly, changing the menu does not stop kids from bringing lunch from home. If kids do not like the new healthy lunches they can always bring there own junk food. Kids who bring lunch would not even care that the menu has changed. If kids do not like the new menu and started to bring lunch, the school would lose money. If kids started bringing lunch from home, the food would be unhealthy anyways. Thirdly, making the school lunch unhealthy is not going to make the child have a healthy lifestyle. Some kids could go to school and have a healthy lunch and then go home and eat an unhealthy dinner. When kids go home and eat they are not thinking about whether the food is healthy or not. All kids want to eat is junk food and candy whether it is at home or school. I think that kids should be able to eat a regular lunch at school just as they do at home. In conclusion, changing the
For all the cuts that have been made to school foods, six percent has not been a big decrease. School lunches don’t provide any nutritional value for the kids. The purpose for a school lunch is to provide kids with a dependable lunch that has good proportional amounts and nutrition value. The obesity rates need to drop higher and faster in the next ten years if they want to make cuts out of our meals and the meals need to be proportioned to size.
In conclusion schools should not change the lunches because they don't have the power to tell students can or can't eat, they don't have the time and money, and finally because they are not allowed to put a limit on how much a student can eat due to the “No Kid Hungry
Imagine going to school and thinking, oh boy what am I going to have for lunch today? And all of the sudden you see something you don’t like, so you don’t eat it and then your stomach starts to growl. What would you do for lunch and how would you explain it to your parents after school? Students have been known to not eat lunch at school very often because, for the main reason, they don’t like it. Others say that they “aren’t hungry”, but you never know. Schools should just make the lunch more healthy and taste better. Even though school lunches could potentially make students sick and not feel good, some students say it is disgusting and causes them not to eat and complain because they’re not getting
The principal is trying to change school lunch menu's to healthier meals. I strongly believe that this is a good idea to change the lunches because of the following reasons: healthier meals makes kids grow big and strong, it gives you more energy to move around, and it taste delicious. Schools all around should consider changing their lunches for the better of their student. This is for the better of the student to have healthy food. I will go into greater detail in the following paragraphs. Although you may think that junk food is good for your body and doing you justice, but it's really not. It's the healthy foods that are doing it such as; vegetables, fruits, and milk. Fruits and vegetables when eaten, give kids the right nourishment
I think changing the schools cafeteria is a good idea and a bad idea. It can effect some students ,and it can help some. The reason why i say that is because some students may be allergic to certain food items on the lunch menu. Therefore if the school lunch is going to have more healthier foods and more variety they need to learn information from students on what they will like to eat and what they are allergic to also to prevent any hazards. Students should always have a opinion in any school problems or changes. If it was my decision which i believe it should be i would put different variety of foods on the lunch menu but also keep students favorites remaining. I believe as a student in Prince William County we all deserve better quality
I believe that if schools start to make their lunches healthier, and start taking the UN healthy foods out then students will stop eating school lunch. The food that they feed us already is not in the best of condition. School's have already taken the majority of the UN healthy foods out of school as it is. So to take out anymore food would be ridiculous. over half of the students pack their lunch as it is. If the students stop eating school lunches then that is money the school is losing. the schools lunches barely have any food you can get anyhow, so to take anymore away wouldn't even be a lunch. The food that we are served in the cafeterias are in decent conditions. I personally think that we have healthy lunches as it is. We are served
Most students don 't think the school lunches are very good. In fact at the Thompson school district teamed up with colorado state University and did a survey on how students like school lunches, and it showed that 93% of students would like a better lunch. The lunch we have now in the schools now these days are cheaply made and governed by the government. We need food that tastes good so are brains can function properly the way they need too. Students need their brain to be functioning right so students can pay attention in class. Grades would probably be better in the long run. Kids wouldn 't be crabby all the time I don 't think, most of them anyway.
In some schools some principals superintendents have made a decision to opt out of the Healthy choice foods and make there own semi-healthy foods that kids like. To reduce waste and bring back students who have opted to pack a lunch or go off campus for fast food, his districts cafeterias have installed stir-fry stations with abundant vegetables so students can have meals made to order. and he’s added spice bars so kids can even the bland. In schools some principals and administrators are starting to take action. They want students to eat healthy but at the same time eat what they like. when students go off campus researchers say they gain more weight then when they eat the food they like at school, healthy or not. If it’s not the healthiest food in the world then the lunches service can put less on the kids plate. Kids will eat more at school if the school sells what the kids like. FInally the school noticed it and finally started selly stir-fry stations. thus Principal and administrators finally noticed that kids hate their food and want the food that they will eat and not throw
It will give students the ability to get rid of the risk of having an unhealthy lunch at school. Although it can make students lose weight, it won't help because those options are already there. Schools already have options like salads or fat free milk that are there for the student to choose. Changing the school lunches can also have an impact on what students eat at home by letting them adapt to the new foods. Changing the lunches will not let them adapt to the new food. It would only change what is at school. Students aren't going to change their whole diet because one meal is changed. changing the school food to become healthier will not have much of an impact. It could lead to students to stop buying lunches. students would start to pack lunches that can be much more unhealthy than what the school lunches originally were. They could load their lunches with any junk food without any limit. It also can create a negative impact because students could stop eating lunch all together. Students would stop eating the lunches that are provided at school and not pack lunches. Students would lack the nutrition that is needed and create some even worse problems
If students start packing their own lunch and not eating the cafeteria lunch then the school will be wasting food and possibly even money because the students don't want to eat it. Parents on the other hand might wonder why their child is coming home always hungry and it would be because the child doesn't like the new lunch menu at school. Then the school will have angry parents at their office desk yelling and complaining about the menu being changed because their child is going all day starving due to them not liking the food. Some of the students might blame it on the cafeteria workers when its not their fault at all, which could lead to the lunch lady's to quit their job or start complaining to. Everyone has a different opinion but this one is mine School lunches should defiantly stay the same no matter what anyone says. Some schools and counties believe it is what's best for the children because it's healthier. When really all the change is doing is making things worse. When the students favorite foods are taken away and they get mad and start cussing and getting in trouble parents wont be happy , or even when the child gets upset or most likely
Some say change is essential for growth while others proclaim it as a necessity of life. Throughout the nation, certain school districts have pondered upon promoting a new variety of cafeteria foods focusing on the outlines of health and nutrition, a debate strongly valued by the likeness of public officials. As health defections soar into a national concern, students and school systems evolve into actions of reform, regulating dietary consumption and improving standards of civil welfare. Overall, varying school lunch menus throughout the region is a necessary assessment to student bodies and communities because it stimulates learning performance and interaction, creates a variety for all, and even promotes change throughout the community, naming this a policy for the win. Performance is dominated through wisdom and