Contingency theories put forth the idea that the success of a leader hinges on the specific situation at hand. A situation can be proven effective based on the leader or the leadership style attached. The factors that would determine this would include the task, the personality of the leader and the composition of the group that is meant to be led. Its basic assumption is that leadership-success or failure – is situational. There are a number of sub-theories that fall under the general contingency umbrella. Specific mention may be made of three such theories; Fielder’s contingency theory, situational leadership and Path- Goal theory.
The Fielder contingency theory suggests that there must be a strong leader- member relationship. A leader
…show more content…
Having a leader that listens to his subordinates gives them hope and motivation to strive for greatness. It may not be the best idea that is given first but the idea would still promote growth on becoming a better team player and also help in their quest of maybe becoming a leader themselves.
Path-Goal theory self explains that leaders influence their subordinates to achieve the goals they already have set. They help them to become better versions of themselves and help them to create stepping stones for the future. This in turn would lead the personal and organizational rewards.
Good leaders are often identified by their leadership traits. Some leadership traits that may be seen are emotional stability, dominance, enthusiasm and conscientiousness. Transformational leadership speaks to the focus of creating a better tomorrow for the organization and its members. A transformational leader promotes a vision and inspires employees to aim for this vision and develop creative ideas. They are enthusiastic individuals are usually seen as active, expressive and energetic. They are often optimistic and open to change with a quick and alert mind set. Transformational leaders in today’s society are better for the organization because in maintaining a business for the long term, leaders need to focus on the overall growth of originality and
The followers have the least chance to question the leader, and their concern can easily be under valued. It is distinguish characteristics in the leader, which have potential to be abused. There is complexity in it. Transformational leadership is a conglomerate of various leadership characteristics which not be easy learn. Such transformational leadership weaknesses could improve the leader integrate more servant leadership elements.
Situational leadership is another example of a leadership theory. This leadership is focused on the leader however, the leader takes not only the followers but also the situation into account. Through different methods of behaviors a leader is able change his or her leadership style to appropriately fit with the followers and the task at hand to achieve best results. Each leader has a different leadership style that can be studied and each one can be used in a different scenario. Situation leadership is very effective when a leader is aware of what the task
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP Transformational Leadership is defined as leadership style focused on effecting revolutionary change in organizations through a commitment to the organization’s vision. (Sullivan & Decker, 2001) Transformational leaders are usually given higher position and are known for their charismatic sense and ability to develop high visions and regards in the work they do. They often give their best performances due to the low morale or self esteem Example: Steve Job, Bill Gates and Ratan Tata. As the existentialist rightly said, we always have a choice, in doing what we already have done or doing that which we have never done.
Hence, during turbulent time, effective leadership is important to evaluate the successful of leader controls regarding tasks and performance related to subgroup of employee in organization. Theory of contingency leadership determines successful leadership depends on leader matching style to the particular situation. Contingency theories show that leadership effectiveness is related to the interplay of a leader 's traits and situational factors. Situational factors refer to the extent which leaders can determine what their groups are going to do and what the outcomes of their actions are going to
They are role models for the beliefs and values they want their followers to adopt (Northhouse, 2014, p. 193). They communicate high expectations for their followers, and they exhibit confidence in followers’ abilities to meet those expectations” (Northhouse, 2014, p. 189). Mr. Cuban exhibits these three characteristics of transformative leadership in every aspect of his leadership.
Their philosophy is “whatever-it takes” and delegates the frontline managers to lead “it is your business, your division, your market, your stores, your aisle and your customers (Home Depot 2009).” Finally , transformational leaders by definition seek to transform. Sometime when a organization does not transform it’s, employees become unhappy and leaders will
They refer to Fielder’s contingency theory, path-goal theory, Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership theory, and Vroom and Yetton’s normative decision model. Each theory is distinctive and different from each other. In the case of McDonald’s, it practices each theory to a certain degree. Fieldler’s contingency theory states that in order to maximize work group performance, leaders must be matched to the right leadership situation (Williams, 2007).
Most of the Leadership Literature which includes contextual factors will mainly focus on one specific situation or scenario. According to Fiedler(1967) the leadership does not occur in vacuum, this paved the way for further research resulting in mutual influence of leaders and context on each other(Endler & Magnusson, 1976). If single context is focused for judging performance it may result in performance
In this regard, leaders and managers can appear at any level of an organisation and are not exclusive of each other (Germano, 2010). Leadership theories identify leaders based upon traits as well as how their influence and power is used to achieve organizational goals and objectives (Germano, 2010). As such, trait based characteristics include leaders such as autocratic, democratic, bureaucratic and charismatic. On the other hand, leadership that is viewed from the perspective of the exchange of power and its utilisation to secure outcomes, are situational, transactional and transformational leaders (Germano, 2010). It is of paramount importance to consider the different types of theories of management and leadership and their potential impact on organizational strategy being that management and leadership plays a vital role in the success of businesses.
Leadership is one of the most important skills in order to successfully execute activities within the field of public administration. It stands for the ability to lead or influence individuals so that they are willing to work towards the accomplishment of group objectives. In class we discussed about theories regarding leadership within public administration. Fred Fielder was one of the major contributors of the one the theories, known as the contingency theory. Even though many of these theories were proposed a lot years ago, the role of leadership currently still plays a crucial goal in our today’s society.
The leader will use different powers kept the follows on topic and engage to the goal. The leader/follower situation framework contains the elements: leader, follower, and situation. The framework lays out a way for leaders to learn their role because the leader need to gain power and hold
Those proposing contingency theories realize that a leader must adjust. The hallmark of these theories is context and in a more profound sense, everything is interdependent. To a certain extent contingency leadership theories are extensions of the trait theory, in the sense that human traits are related to the situation in which the leaders exercise their leadership. It is generally accepted within the contingency theories that leader are more likely to express their leadership when they feel that their followers will be
This paper will examine the three leadership theories, identify how they apply to my practice, and explore how these theories interact with each other. The Trait Leadership Theory is based on the belief that a person is born with special traits contributing to natural leadership abilities. Studies of famous historical leaders have been used to identify various traits for this theory. Although the list of traits differs from study to study, there are five major traits that are consistent throughout most studies.
In conclusion, there are many different characteristics that make a good leader. There are a variety of different approaches to leadership, but those who succeed in their leadership role are very likely to exhibit the characteristics that we have discussed her. A good leader has commitment and a positive attitude, knows how to delegate, can communicate effectively and is prepared to actively lead a
This paper is going to encompass different leadership theories and their relevance to my own personal personality and method of leadership. There will be information on the advantages and disadvantages of the leadership theories and information on each including examples. The purpose of this paper is to view various kinds of leadership theories and apply them to a real-life scenario. Leadership Theories There are quite a few different leadership theories available for people to take information from and use in business settings and even personal settings.