Public leadership does not function properly without a solid relationship between the leader and those who are led. Leadership is conventionally attributed as a skill or quality pertaining to the individual, however, leadership contains complex layers that transcend the common individual and gives rise to a dynamic power relationship. Personal and contextual aspects contribute to the definition and understanding of what makes a successful leader. Joseph S. Nye, George C. Edwards III, and Graham T. Allison are some of the academics that have contributed to this school of thought. Their works focus on several aspects of the dynamic power relationship between leaders and followers, like: personal traits of the leader, charisma, contextual intelligence, and decision making. This school of thought uncovers the public conception of how leadership is judged. Leadership is not primarily judged on the individual, but on context in which leaders find themselves. The success of these leaders is based on their ability to balance soft and hard power in regard to the context of their environment, as politics and the environment could constrain or influence their decision making. In order to discuss the judgment of leadership based on contextual aspects, there needs to be an understanding of which traits are relative to the leader and which are relative to the environment. One trait that is commonly attributed to a leader is charisma, however, George Edwards writes, “Charisma cannot be
A leader must be able to have confidence without letting it prevent him from seeing the realities of ruling. Only then can they have a long, prosperous, and successful career in
(Kerfoot 1998) (Evans, 2003). The Personality traits for good leader are activity level or energy, adjustment, dominance, assertiveness, emotional balance and emotional control, self- confidence, originality, intelligence, tolerance of stress, personal integrity, independence, achievement motivation, sociability, responsibility, initiative, and diplomacy (NYSTEDT 1997). Furthermore, Agreeableness and conscientiousness is perceived as a trait for transformational leaders (ARTOG2 et al 2005).
Wherever human beings are accumulated together in large numbers, they need leadership. Even a school needs a principle to mentor and escalate the school’s rank. Armies need generals to lead them to a courageous victory. Civilians need governments, captains of industry and intellectual leaders of thought as well. However, There are characteristics common to most great leaders that can be picked out.
This is a valuable trait of a leader that I embody. Another trait that is vital is responsibility. To keep up with my busy schedule that includes schoolwork, sports, service, as well as being social, I stay very organized and responsible. This helps me greatly in my endeavors as a leader, as do the other qualities I
Trait theory states that leaders are born, and they are not made. Everyone has the personality that can give them leadership positions. With the right condition, anyone can be a good leader (Colbert, et al.
Charismatic Leadership Author Name University name The word "charisma" comes from the Greek language (χάρισμα (khárisma)) and means “favor freely given.” It goes back to the word “Graces” or “Charites” (Χάριτες), which in Greek mythology was the name for three goddesses of beauty and grace. Even in ancient Greece people with charismatic qualities, were considered as favored by the gods who helped their chosen ones to achieve extraordinary success. Charisma is the magnetic force emitted by the person, the art of fascinating the others.
In developing this paper on leadership, I examined what was most important to me as a leader. As I reflected on my leadership philosophy, I thought about my experiences and the principals that I have learned through my own self-discovery and the observation of other leaders that I have had throughout my life. My leadership philosophy paper will focus on what leadership is to me, core values, and knowledge of others. In thinking about my definition of leadership, I thought of what was most important to me in and as a leader.
Those individuals who were believed to have these inherent skills were people of very influential status, wartime heroes and those of great wealth. The people who emerge or are most picked to lead have distinctive drives and character profiles (Nicholson, 2013, p.16). Leadership Thought Development from 1900 – 1970 The thought of leadership evolved from the Great Man Theory to Trait Theory and Behavior Theory. The trait theory focuses on identifying distinctive personality traits and characteristics that are associated to successful leadership.
Leadership Analysis Introduction One of the popular definitions of a leader is, "The only definition of a leader is someone who has followers." ( ) A more comprehensive definition that highlights striking features of a leader is, "A simple definition of leadership is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal.” ( ) A closer scrutiny of the characteristics of an influential leader would many ways assist one, in recognizing those attributes in an attempt to assimilate the best in others.
Critical Review of Leadership Theories There have been a variety of theorists who have tried to understand how good leaders acquire their skills and whether the components which make up a successful leader are hereditary or learned. Many Studies have been made using twins to identify that about forty percent of differences in personality are hereditary. (Vernon et al., 1998) From this we can see that it is not only a matter of whether a person in born with these skills but one must also build on them to become a successful leader.
Task-1 Describe how and to what extent does Steve jobs careers illuminate the difference between leadership and management styles? The choice of Steve Jobs for this case study draws in many aspects of the theories of leadership and reminds us of one further thing: that successful leaders may sometimes divide the world into two camps: those who adore the leader and those who cannot stand him(or her). This phenomenon is not so unusual: it was true of Margaret Thatcher’s political leadership, for example, and of many military leaders over the centuries.
Individual Reflective Paper Introduction Leadership, a controversial concept, has been studied for centuries. Scholars who study leadership have argued with the insight of leadership for many decades and finally promote a wide range of understandings of it. This course “values and leadership” introduces the basic principles and concepts about leadership, and provides us with some conceptual knowledge and practical approaches to be an outstanding leaders. I chose to take this course because I am interested in the topic about leadership.
LEADERSHIP Ogbeidi (2012) found that leadership is referred as “ability to lead, direct and organize a group”. The study of leadership has developed scientifically through changing paradigms during its history where several models and theories have tried to explain the concept of leadership. Kuchler (2008) acknowledges that although subject of leadership is diverse and somewhat scattered but it tends to be one of the most widely discussed topics by the researchers all over the world. We found myriad definitions of leadership after studying detailed literature on it. The concept of leadership is described by different researchers with different perspectives.
This paper will examine the three leadership theories, identify how they apply to my practice, and explore how these theories interact with each other. The Trait Leadership Theory is based on the belief that a person is born with special traits contributing to natural leadership abilities. Studies of famous historical leaders have been used to identify various traits for this theory. Although the list of traits differs from study to study, there are five major traits that are consistent throughout most studies.
Question 1 Are leadership and management different from one another? If so, how? Answer: Leadership- The ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals.