India: Tobacco Industry Beware!
For 1000’s of years, humans all over the globe have been enjoying and consuming tobacco in its various forms. Tobacco has been used for both recreational and religious purposes since the earliest humans. Tobacco continues to be used to this day by millions of people globally. Regardless of this fact, countries have felt the need to impose either a financial or legal restriction on its use and purchase. India is one such country to follow this growing trend. In Feb 2001, the country banned tobacco companies from advertising and sponsoring any events within the country in hopes it would decrease consumption. (Ban on Tobacco, 2001)
There are some people who view the ban on advertising in a favorable way. Banning
…show more content…
That said I agree that the country does have a public health interest in opposing the advertising of tobacco. For this reason I agree with the India governments approach that tobacco companies should not be able to profit from advertising harmful products to consumers. I also feel that similarly, alcohol should be banned from advertising, as well as any other potentially harmful products. It is unfair to just single out one industry. In reality I know that just because tobacco isn’t advertised doesn’t mean adults are not going consume it. In fact the Indian Market Research Bureau conducted a survey in 1998, which asked smokers what influenced their decision to start smoking. The results showed “49% of the respondents said they started smoking to see what it was like, 24% said 'all my friends smoke'; and no one said advertising had induced them to start smoking.” (Ban on Tobacco, 2001) Therefore it seems that if the government’s intent was based on the publics health, the best approach to decrease smoking would be to an out right ban on its sale and consumption. Without doing this people will still decide to smoke regardless of a lack of advertising or known health risks. It seems unfair to single out one industry like tobacco when there are much worse dangers created by polluters. According to a collaborative study done
In the year 1600, tobacco spread all through the United States and in the nations around it. To the people in America, tobacco smoking was taken as a tradition which they all had adopted. By the year 1604, James I the king of England, opposed tobacco smoking, saying that it would cause wild behaviors to the people. By then, tobacco smoking had become a habit for most of the people in England and they begged to be allowed to continue doing it. In the year 1612, tobacco was planted not only to be consumed now but also as a cash crop.
Overall, this method has not helped much. Smoker have not disappeared but have been displaced. In summary, Cigarettes should continue to be legal because it prevents the need for contraband tobacco, keeps kids from using it to a minimum, and countries that have banned it affect the users. We need to keep them regulated and slowly campaign people to stop smoking.
The medical world in the present day is much more advanced than it was just a few years ago. There are new medical breakthroughs as well as new diseases discovered every day. But, what we all have known for years is the tobacco is not good for the body and causes cancer. According to cancer.org, lung cancer is the leading cause of death by cancer in the United States and about 71 percent of Americans who have been diagnosed with lung cancer die from their cancer. (Tobacco-related cancers fact sheet. 2014.)
In connection, healthcare prices ascribed to tobacco-related sickness are only 1.2 billion USD per year. Moreover, harsher rules on tobacco advertising may ruin the occupation of about 6 million Indonesian inhabitants who work in tobacco linked productions. In the further part, while it is projected that 23.7 per cent of the 1.7 million killings in Indonesia in 2007 were affected by tobacco, it is only a subgroup of the people whose condition is disturbed in this way. It was anticipated that the population of Indonesia in July 2013 was 251.2
Smoking should be banned in public places? Smoking should be banned in public places because smoking can cause health problems to the children and people who do not smoke, the workplace can be healthy and cigarettes cost more. Can smoking cause health problem? Well yes, smoking can cause health problems such as heart attack, strokes, and respiratory diseases. some children and people who do not smoke can also cause health problem because people who smoke passes by them and non-smoker get infected.
The smoking rates in Australia have decreased over 50 years because of the following campaigns the government has undertaken: the National Tobacco Campaign and the Antismoking Campaign (respectively). Both of these campaigns were successful in decreasing the amount of people smoking. The National Tobacco Campaign focuses on graphic advertisements displayed on billboards, on T.V, on radio and reaching to non-English speakers. The later phase of this campaign was launched on the 14th February 2006.
Profit and money are the driving factors behind so many things, that people are not very motivated to eradicate something that earns them billions of dollars. Yes, legislation such as those to reduce secondhand smoke positively affect health outcomes, but I feel it is not enough. Tobacco is a legal substance despite its known negative, sometimes fatal repercussions. There is a plethora of research regarding the deadly and harmful effects of smoking and cigarette use, yet it is a legal substance used by millions. I think that the government needs to forget the profit aspect and focus on its citizens health.
Tobacco in the United States has become a big money maker, as the use of tobacco has blown up so has tobacco related deaths. Tobacco comes in forms ranging from smoking to smokeless. Those who are generally just against tobacco may view smokeless tobacco as a harmful substance due to its ability to cause a variety of oral cancers, leading to a significant portion of oral deaths, and a nicotine dependence development. Those who may agree that tobacco use is not safe but also look at the smoking tobacco vs smokeless tobacco can see just how smokeless is a lifesaver and can benefit public health. Smokeless can reduced risk of oral cancer and other cancers compared to smoking, has a significantly lower death toll than smoking does, and the possibility of slowly quitting tobacco.
Smoking is a choice and no one is forcing that upon people. The public has been well warned about the risks of smoking; therefore, the people smoking are fully aware that their lives are at risk. Tobacco companies should not be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths because once people put the tobacco in their mouths, they are putting there own life at risk themselves, and because as individuals we have a choice on whether or not to smoke cigarette. It 's true that tobacco companies aren 't accountable for why people smoke. Nonetheless, every tobacco product has a warning label on it therefore it 's not the companies responsibility from smoking-related illnesses and deaths.
E-cigarettes have seen a surge in usage over recent times across the world. Various sources have claimed a decrease in health risks and an increased threshold of quitting, while others suggest little or no differences in health benefits over regular cigarettes. This essay will discuss the intentions of E-cigarettes as a whole, the targeted and proposed demographics, and whether or not allegations made against or towards E-cigarettes retain any crucial validity. To fully understand the nature of this topic, one should first be made aware of the inner-workings of an E-cigarette.
The time has come to reevaluate the ethics concerning the global distribution of cigarettes by American tobacco companies. Tobacco Industry Ethics Currently, there are many ethical grey areas in legislation regarding the global distribution of American branded cigarettes. Some policies regarding this specific type of potentially hazardous product have already been adopted domestically. The way, means, type, content, and target audience of tobacco products is closely scrutinized and regulated in America. Furthermore, warning labels expressing the health risks accosted with smoking are mandated wherever tobacco advertising is permitted.
Worldwide, tobacco use causes about 90% of lung cancer deaths, 30% of all cancers, 20-25% of coronary heart diseases and stroke deaths, and more than 80% of chronic bronchitis and emphysema”. (Jordan 1). Secondly not only does it affect smokers but even people who don 't even partake in the activity of smoking cigarettes. Second hand smoke is a serious issue and can cause cancer almost easy as being an actual smoker can.
Tobacco Control, 15 (3), 270-275. Simpson, D. (2002). India: states ban oral tobacco. Tobacco Control, 11(4), 291-291. Szilagyi, T. (2002).
Smoking causes close to 40% of cancer death in the US. Each year, cigarettes kill about 500,000 deaths in the US and about 6 million deaths around the world. Cigarettes are the reason for most of the deaths in our society today that is not a death by a natural cause. Even though smoking has been in a sharp decline in the past decade, there are still around 40 million of people in the US that still smoke cigarettes. This high number really concerns many doctors and
Smoking Should be Banned in Public Cigarettes contain a large number of chemicals and toxins, which mainly include nicotine and carbon monoxide. In addition, a substance called dioxin contamination led to the animal feed, which causes cancer. People of different age groups smoke cigarettes on daily basis as they might take it as to be cool especially in youngsters mind and being up to date with modern day society. Although a lot of awareness campaigns warn people that smoking destroys their health, they continue to smoke. Smoking contains about fifty carcinogen or carcinogenic and dozens of other toxic and harmful substances; therefore a lot of developed countries have made laws that prohibits smoking in public places, which obliges everyone to respect these decisions.