Huey Long challenged Louisiana politics. In 1936 Huey P. Long planned on developing his own programs and policies. He used unconventional ways to achieve his goals and always got a slap on the wrist every time. Some believe he was nothing but a corrupt and sinister person. Others believe he did what he had to do to improve the state of Louisiana. According to Sanson, Long was a fascinating person. He was a corrupt, yet beneficial governor. He was responsible for fixed elections, robbing local government of its authority, kidnapping political opponents, and using power for his personal goals. Although he used his power for shameful actions, he used it to improve Louisiana. Long used his political power to provide textbooks to children, improved …show more content…
Long didn’t care what others thought. He did whatever he had to do to achieve his goals, whether they be for good or bad. He used unconventional methods to fulfil his goals. When it came to his bold quality, Long would greet visitors in his pajamas or vest. He would wander around restaurants eating other people’s food, drinking, and would try to urinate between people’s legs standing in front of him in the restroom. Long had no filter in nearly every setting. He wanted the people to see him as one of them which he was not. He was a different person with good and bad intentions like his brother, Earl Long. Earl enjoyed buying things he had no use for such as chickens, goats, ropes, seed, and hams to give away to the people. Huey Long used childish tactics to win over the voters by saying things like his opponents hair wasn’t real or saying one pumped perfume under his arms. Although the Longs had childish ways, they delivered on the things they promised. Huey Long was responsible for improved roads, schools, hospitals, and more. Even though Long did good, his focus remained on gaining power. Badger noted that Huey’s brother, Earl, received kickbacks from multiple companies after WWII so the companies could have untrammeled slot machines. This shows how Earl and his brother were alike. They focused on what was best for
Representing Massachusetts in the Continental Congress, he was able to make his newspaper, the Independent Advertiser, a successfully spread out newspaper with his views on government. His thought was that citizens should be taxed on anything without being able to take part in parliament. This was his greatest advantage to make people change the way
Ma and Pa Ferguson both left a mark in history when they were Texas governor. I would like to cover who they were, what they did, when it happened, and why they are important. Miriam Amanda Wallace also known as Ma Ferguson born June 13, 1875 in Bell County Texas. Once she graduated high school she attended college at Baylor college for women in Belton. She is also the first women to be Texas governor and the first women to have two separate terms.
Before America could have any Founding Fathers, the country needed Sons of Liberty to stand up to the British government. These men harnessed the outrage that had spread following Parliament 's Stamp Act of 1765, which levied an internal tax on the colonies. Though the Stamp Act was repealed, the disagreement over "taxation without representation" wouldn 't go away, resulting in events like the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party. The History Channel miniseries Sons of Liberty takes a dramatic look at the men who led the protests and upheavals that eventually resulted in revolution and independence.
The third of the opposed to the New Deal was Senator Huey Long. In this document Huey Long outlines his radical plan to equalize the people of America. He plans for anyone who makes over $1 million to share the wealth with those less fortunate. His plan is clearly anti-wealthy and he uses his populist ideology of egalitarianism to sway opinion.
His being a respected political figure probably helped him support the Patriots in the American
A passionate politician, he advocated for war with Great Britain shortly after the inception of the United States. He was the chairman on the committees that passed bills supporting roads, permanent roads, and a strong army and navy. During this time, he was a proponent of nationalism, supporting strong national policies. He served as the secretary of war under James Monroe. He was a leading member of the old Republican party (later the Democratic party).
He exercised a mentality of being untouchable seen in the way he pushes the limits of his
He was selfish, he took land that rightfully belonged to the Indians and didn 't feel guilty about it. The battle he is known best for is the battle of New Orleans, he won the battle but that battle was not necessary. He was a sore loser, when he didn 't win president the first time around he accused Adams of corruption. When he became president he wanted to get rid of paper money, he hated it. Think about it for a minute, if he hated paper money, why should he be on it?
Confederate president Jefferson Davis’s previous career as secretary of war qualified him for running the Confederacy, but some of his characteristics hindered his leadership ability. He was extremely smart but interacted awkwardly with people. He often associated compromise with weakness and differing opinions as personal attacks. In contrast to Davis, Abraham Lincoln won the support of his people by “persevering the importance of the Union”. He also created support in his speeches where he used pathos to create an emotional connection to his people by referring to “the family man”.
One problem still stood and that was that many children did not have any access to education. A Massachusetts lawyer by the name of Horace Mann, led movements to try to create new common schools for all children. Mann believed that available public education for children of every social class would revive social equality and give them an equal chance to excel in social mobility. These schools would also keep society in order by disciplining children and building their individual character and teaching them to obey authority. By 1860, with the help from generous labor unions, factory owners and middle-class reformers, every northern state had school systems for all children of every social
Thomas Jefferson was the third president of the United States. Jefferson was one of the most important president during that time period. Jefferson’s home state was Virginia and was a Democratic Republican. He had many accomplishments and was also the author of the Declaration of Independence. Jefferson went through some hard and cruel times during his presidency.
A social economist views the 1950s as the social classes being defined. The time boasted an image of successfulness during a time of peace and conformity. However, the 1950s do not deserve its reputation as a time of peaceful conformity. The harmonic image of the 1950s was an over-generalization that ignores the realities of what was going on in the country. The peaceful conformity was a false image that showed it’s true colors through gender/ethnic relations and the beginning of the Rock and Roll era.
During the time of the Progressive Era in 1900s-1920s, the majority of the American believed that the industrialization, immigration, and the urbanization had produced critical social disorders and believes that reforms were needed to be reshaped America. They also believed that it was time to eliminate the problem caused by the corruption in the government and promote the improvement in order to address the social and economic problems. People like Theodore Roosevelt and W.E.B.Du Bois also accepted that change was needed to improve and develop. The major changes were made in social, economic and political reforms. But, was the Progressive Era a success?
“A hard worker and never lazy, and so big and fine‐looking He didn’t take things hard, he didn’t grouch and whine when things didn’t go his way” She describes the time that they spent together as a wonderful time a time filled with joy that she will never now again. His character was too good almost perfect not only did
Long, holds the idea that the government should intervene in industry in order to share wealth across all classes to provide equal opportunity, while President Hoover advocates as little government intervention as possible without actually becoming laissez faire. I agree more with Hoover, although Long makes some points that I do not necessarily disagree with, such as opportunity of inheritance. I use Haiti as an example in distributing wealth after gaining independence. Without large economic and industrial holders, they were never able to advance in technology or business because no one had the resources to get it started. I do not blame the top 1% for the economic downfall of the lower class, but I see larger social problems as the main source especially in American Society.