Abstract Job satisfaction is one of the important elements in organizational psychology. Several contributors could be identified in order to enhance the level of jobs satisfaction because higher job satisfaction will lead to better job performance. This study aimed to explore the contributors of job satisfaction among the employees in an oil and gas company in Malaysia. A qualitative approaches was used in this study whereby a focus group interview was conducted on three respondents. A thematic data analysis was used in order to identify the major theme (contributors) of job satisfaction. The study found two major themes (a) Intrinsic aspects (Achievement, recognition and work itself) and (b) Extrinsic aspects (Interpersonal relationship, …show more content…
For further study, we recommend to identify the contributors of jobs satisfaction between different departments due to different views and opinions on job satisfaction between technical and administration …show more content…
According to the theory, factors that affect job satisfaction can be divided into two factors, which are motivational (intrinsic) and hygiene (extrinsic) factors. Moreover, based on the research findings, Herzberg and his colleagues explained that job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction are two separate dimensions that not exist on the same continuum. To explain on job satisfaction, if a person has high job satisfaction, the opposite site of it is low or no job satisfaction. It is the same applied to job dissatisfaction, where if a person has high job dissatisfaction, the opposite site of it is low or no job dissatisfaction. Some examples of motivational (intrinsic) factors are achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, and advancement. Meanwhile, examples of hygiene (extrinsic) factors are supervision, interpersonal relations, physical working conditions, salary, company policy and administration, benefits and job security (Stello,
Overall, the study conducted by Simon and Houghton (2003) highlights the importance of developing a strong work ethic, time management skills, and support system in order to achieve success both on and off the
The learning objective I chose to further explore was “Explain the role of the industrial hygienist in anticipating, recognizing, evaluating, and controlling workplace environments that may affect the health of the worker.” The Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) website has a breadth articles on the specific functions of an Industrial Hygienist. The “Informational Booklet on Industrial Hygiene” has been made public for reproduction and serves as a good overview to explain the role of the industrial hygienist. (Herman & Jeffress, 1998)
A work environment requires more consideration for those around you and how your actions impact their health and wellbeing. It is astonishing to realise how quickly germs can spread through basic hygiene neglect. Poor hygiene can contribute towards many health-related problems. We have already explored how infection control can reduce these risks but it is always worth reminding yourself of these.
The two health hazards that I have chosen are Infections and Substances. Infections: If you are not following the correct procedures you are putting your own life and the service user’s life’s in risk. Food hygiene in care settings must be scrupulous as if you do not take care
This is another situation where the community was mainly people of color or people of low SES, but environmental precautions were not being carried out. Another environment with policies that affect health is the work
Tan & Waheed (2011) stated that the survey was done by way of convenient sampling to select sales personnel from women’s clothing stores at Bandar Sunway shopping mall located at Selangor, Malaysia. One hundred and eighty selected sales personnel of heterogeneity were surveyed by a questionnaire written in English. The questionnaire included a series of statements and questions pertaining to determinants of job satisfaction. The survey candidates were requested to indicate their degree of agreement to each. According to the researchers, linear regression analysis was performed to test the relationship between Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory and job satisfaction and further analysis was done evaluating the relationship between money and job satisfaction.
Herzberg a psychologist, proposed a theory called motivation – hygiene theory conducted in the 1950s that refers to the factors that motivate employees care (Ahmad and Azumah, 2012). He established motivators and hygiene factor care (Ahmad and Azumah, 2012). Motivators include include achievement, recognition, nature of the work, responsibility and career progression care (Ahmad and Azumah, 2012). While the hygiene factors include policy, supervision, interpersonal relations, working conditions, and salary care (Ahmad and Azumah, 2012). In contrast, the hygiene factors are dissatisfied of job satisfaction fortunately their absence doesn’t affect job satisfaction care (Ahmad and Azumah, 2012).
He conducted a series of research surveys to several hundred accountants and engineers that describe specific situations where they felt exceptionally bad about their jobs and also describe where they felt exceptionally good about their jobs. On the basic of his study, the theory explains the factors that motivate employees by identifying their individual needs and desires. He reported that employees tend to describe satisfying experiences in terms of factors that were intrinsic to the content of job itself. These factors were called ‘motivators’ which included opportunity to experience achievement, receive recognition, work itself, take responsibility, and experience advancement and growth. On the contrary, the factors that lead to dissatisfaction is called ‘hygiene’ factors, such as company policies, salary, job security, working conditions and
There are several theories that were invented as theories that analysis the prevalence of employee and job satisfaction. Since well employee satisfaction is influenced by being satisfied in the workplace, the theories should cover both concepts in order to elaborate more on both concepts. The following are some of the theories invented to elaborate the relationship between both concepts and they are as follows: Affective Event Theory According to Thompson and Phua (2001), cited by Ali, Edwin and Tirimba (2015: 419) the affective event theory was developed by Psychologist Howard M. Weiss and Russell Cropanzano to explain how emotions and moods influence job satisfaction. The theory explains the linkages between employees’ internal influences
Within the extensive body of literature on job satisfaction in the workplace, there are numerous theories that attempt to explain the concept of job
According to Spector (1997, 2), job satisfaction is defined as “simply how people feel about their special aspects of their jobs. It is the point to which people like (satisfaction) or dislike (dissatisfaction) their jobs.” Additionally, Mbua (2003, 305) then, defines job satisfaction as “the completion acquire by experience various job activities and rewards.” Whereas, for Robbins (2005), the concept job satisfaction refers to the employee’s thoughts about her or his job. Similarly, job satisfaction is “a positive feeling about one‟s job consequential from an evaluation of its characteristics”
Introduction In any organisation, a good leadership is important to motivate their subordinates, bring the organisation forward and achieve its goals. A good leader has a clear vision and passion to influence their followers. Job satisfaction and organisational commitment are important factors in determining organizational efficiency. Robbins & Judge (2013) defined leadership as the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals and to perform at their highest capability (Rad and Yarmohammadian, 2006).
(D.C. Feldman and H.J. Arnold 1983). “Job satisfaction is the amount of pleasure or contentment associated with a job. If you like your job intensely, you will experience high job satisfaction. If you dislike your job intensely, you will experience job dissatisfaction”. (Andrew J. DuBrins 1988).
Transformational leadership style with idea indicator, the influence of leader behavior, intellectual stimulation and a consideration of individual has a positive influence towards motivation. This leadership style has positive influence toward job satisfaction. (Risambessyet) job satisfaction has been studied in parallel with many aspects of work and in many work places and fields around the world, the employees has experienced job satisfaction as an outcome of leadership styles. In general, research results suggested that in organizations which are more flexible and adopted the management type in communication and employees reward the latter more likely to be satisfied which results in the organization’s success.(Jill, McKinnon et al. 2003)
Job satisfaction occurs when employees consider the type of the