3. Methodology
3.1 Introduction
The purpose of this chapter is to outline the methods used in the gathering of data to answer the dissertation question. Limitations of the method, a description of the research tools and why it is being undertaken will be discussed. Research can be defined as “a systematic and organised effort to investigate a problem that needs a solution and encompasses the process of inquiry, investigation, examination and experimentation” (Sekaran 1992, p.4). Methodology is required to answer the research question and fulfil the objectives of the study.
Social sciences are mostly associated with qualitative research as opposed to a quantitative approach. According to Bryman (2012), quantitative research focuses on measurement,
…show more content…
All selected participants were adults, requiring no parental permission or supervision. The minimum age for drinking and gambling is eighteen and due to the sensitive nature of the topics, the participants were adults only. According to Bryman (2012), the facilitator or moderator is expected to guide the session but remain unobtrusive throughout the process. A semi structured setting was provided to allow for the participants to confront the issues presented before them without too much involvement from the moderator. Following lapses in conversation, the moderator prompted further discussion with questions. Consent forms were signed by all members of the group and can be viewed in the appendices section (see Appendix 1). All methods undertaken were approved by Ballyfermot College of Further Education and Dublin City University for the purpose of academic research prior to commencement of the …show more content…
Researcher driven recruitment strategies were implemented to recruit the participants in the form of text messages, phone calls and emails. Good organisation is always required for the focus group to run smoothly. Introductory questions, key questions and closing questions were prepared to prompt the discussion. The focus group was conducted in a neutral venue under agreement by all participants. Several rules were incorporated and the participants were thanked for agreeing to take part:
The length of the focus group is thirty minutes and the discussion will be recorded using a ‘Zoom Handy H1’ recording device.
A transcription of the recording will be made at a later date.
Identities of those participating will be kept anonymous.
The participants will be referred to as a letter (A-F) in the transcription.
A copy of the relevant points of discussion can be sent out to all members of the group if requested.
The recording will be deleted following transcription for anonymity
As a result of searching the existing literature, the researcher was able to obtain data that correlated exceptionally well with the research topic. Indeed, the researcher gathered pertinent information from secondary sources; however, the primary sources of data were needed to draw a logical conclusion of the research at hand. So, the next step was major section III, Research Methodology. Being
During Week One, the researcher met with the two focus groups to establish a different rapport and provide an explanation of the research study. Although the researcher had previously established a rapport with the students in each group, it was imperative that the students not view the researcher as one of their Assistant Principals while the study was being conducted. Once the researcher gauged the initial feeling tone towards the research project that had been presented to the focus groups, permission forms were sent home with each participant. Lastly, the researcher conducted an informal observation in both classrooms.
Rhetorical Analysis This essay represents an effective piece of argumentation. The author states her purpose by saying teens are not mature enough to handle a lower age to legally drink alcohol. Tag? Joyce Alcantara tries to convince the readers that the age to legally drink should not be altered and assumes that the audience agrees that “Our youths today are the leaders of tomorrow” (468). With that, we must protect our years ahead.
The participants were led into a quiet room and asked to listen to a 2½-min. tape that they were told would be
Why? I am going to make a book about the veterans of Columbia Falls favorite childhood memories. The reason why I decided to do this project is because I wanted to honour the veterans for all the sacrifices they made for America. Another reason is I love listening to stories from the past so I decided I wanted to do something that the community and I can enjoy for years to come.
Research Design 3.2. Participants 3.3. Instruments 3.4. Procedure 4. Limitations 5.
Advocates and supporters of lowering the MLDA 21 to 18 allows young adults the right to make decisions about the consumption of alcohol. As the age of 18 entails an individual to legally become a young adult, receiving the “[rights] and responsibilities [required] to vote… and purchase cigarettes…” (Chiappetta), being prosecuted and tried as an adult, serve on juries, getting married, and drafting to the military – in which dangers the lives of themselves and others surrounding them. As lowering the MLDA from 21 to 18 will lessen the excitement to break the law for consuming alcohol finding the balance between moderation and consumption will become less taboo for workforce individuals and incoming university students. While allowing the consumption of alcohol in regulated and licensed environments and establishments as opposed to unsupervised house parties or fraternity houses “decreases the likelihood of danger and [controversial] actions” (McCardell). Advocates and adversaries of lowering the MLDA 21 both establish the safety of individuals who consume alcohol is always top priority.
In recent conversation, the United States alcoholism has become one of its modest problems. People believe that the drinking age is set appropriately at 21 years of age. Here and now, the behavior of teens who denote the drinking age have argued that while it may be true that it should be changed to 18, believing that it will reduce the attraction of underage drinkers. The drinking age should not be altered with for three important reasons. First of all, it causes harmful medical complications.
The IRB of NCU works to adhere to the Belmont Report, Title 45, Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and the Office for Human Research (NCU, 2015d). In adherence with these agencies, NCU supplemental materials stress repeatedly that research of any type, including data collection, any form of contact with potential human subjects, and recruitment of human subjects, cannot begin until approval from the NCU Institutional Review Board (NCU, 2015c, NCU, 2015d). The discussion provided herein assumes the NCU IRB application and supplementary documentation has been completed by the student researcher, and thusly, only addresses the IRB process once the application has been drafted. After the completion of the IRB application, compiling of supplementary documentation, and completion of supplementary checklist, the student researcher submits the documentation to their department chair (DC). The DC submits the student’s application, supplementary material, and checklist to the IRB (NCU, 2015c).
Since 1984 there has been a federal act that strongly advises states not to allow citizens under the age of 21 from drinking alcoholic beverages. To this day there are still people arguing about this law, both for and against it. Having a minimum drinking age set at 21 is a popular ongoing debate that has many supporters and disputers. To begin, alcohol was a key topic in debates
Discuss the methodological and ethical issues which are apparent in this study. How have the findings impacted the psychological field? One methodological issue with the Bain et al refrigerator study is that type of experiment used. Having used a laboratory experiment, all variables were under strict control and this does not reflect the true nature of the situation the children were placed in. Children trapped inside a refrigerator would not escape by pressing a panel on the floor, thus the experiment has features which do not reflect an accurate representation of a real life situation (Bain et al, 1958).
The power point presentation involved several aspects of the professional and the role of advanced practice registered nurse (APRN). I presented the presentation to my co-workers directly following are Emergency Department (ED) monthly staff meeting. Unfortunately, there was low turn this month and I only had 12 participants who attended the presentation. The audience included eight registered nurses, three nursing assistants, and one emergency physician.
Methodology In my thesis I utilized the quantitative content analysis method. There are many definitions of this research method from different authors. Most of the definitions include similar principles. The research should be systematical, objective, quantitative and replicable.
The term Research Methodology refers to a set of procedures, methods & techniques that are put together by the researchers to obtain a solution to the problems they confront during the collection of data. The researchers look for the most crucial data which is inevitable for the research. Generally there are three kinds of approaches or research methods namely Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed. These methods are used to gather data and resolve issues that emerge during the process of data gathering. The researcher can bring forward his findings either in the form of quantitative or qualitative or mixed research methodologies only when the data is collected based on the preliminary data gathering process and the secondary data gathering process.
Secondly, a methodology that describes the collection of data included together with highlights of limitations and thirdly key findings analysed and interpreted followed by some useful recommendations. Finally some future directions for research have been