Which makes his writing so interesting because there’s a lot of interpretation of his writings after reading his stories. Kate Chopin on the other handwriting is more open, very clear and understandable. Her choice of words is precisely making her sentence clear and exact. Both stories share a common theme such as freedom, death and the style of writing. Dakwa 2 Freedom is the masterpiece of everything, we all want freedom and to be completely free but we don’t know what it really means.
In addition to all of this, the pace of the story can put you into an almost identical mindset of the characters. It is extremely effective and truly convinces the reader how important not only the book that is being read actually is, but how significant all books can be. Not to mention how dystopian a world lacking such important influences can end up being. As previously stated, the world of the future in Bradbury’s story has its flaws, but what is wrong beyond never
This book is not a difficult read, an elementary student could read it, but the issue of the plot is what makes this novel so serious. For example, when “Blood and something else, something white and gel-like” (313) is described to extrude from Assef’s eye, a seemingly graphic scene is made moderately gruesome. Evidently, no complex vocabulary or literary devices are used. Also observed is the fact that Hosseini tends to frequent the use of flashbacks. These flashbacks often occur at epiphenous moments in Amir’s life.
This is because I truly loved Death’s idiosyncratic comments and informative narration in the book. Even though the movie was very literally visual, I had an easier time imagining the book and understanding it. I really enjoyed reading Max’s books and didn’t have this pleasureful opportunity in the movie. I enjoyed the sensory details and Zusak’s writing style. Lasty, my opinion might be swayed by the fact that I read the book first, making it my image for ‘the right one’.
Movies don’t have a complex storyline as movies shorten the story down to a simple plot with slight similarities to the book it is based off of. Most of the time, the script does not do the story justice. Movies are limited as it relies on visual stimulation and having to tell a story primarily through dialogue. It is tough for filmmakers to depict the inner conflicts of a character’s mind thus making it very shallow and lacking in depth. Furthermore, movies are visual and auditory.
Bryan’s writing structure in his book is professional by the way he would introduces different court cases he had previously worked on into each progressing personal thought and analysis over the topic of innocents on death row. From beginning to end the dictionary was my best friend when struggling through the author 's complex vocabulary. The selection of his vocabulary such as; menacing, discretionary, and unprecedented made it difficult to understand the author when he was expressing his thoughts or describing a scenario. His writing style is intelligent because even though his writing tends to be scholarly, there are ways to still create pictures with your head. His descriptive scenario gave me a tangible image of how it might’ve looked like and me feel in his position during this intense scene when a white male police officer pointed a gun to his face because he looked suspicious in the middle of the night sitting in his car.
Patrick Henry used ethos, which is author 's appeal to credibility. Henry shows many examples of ethos by going back and acclaim the other speakers that have spoke, that he certainly does not agree with. According to Patrick Henry, he states “I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen, if entertaining, as I do, opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve”
After the 1940’s, the thoughts that swirled most in people’s heads were completely blank, and it was not even just their impassive thoughts, but everything else happening around them. People took in what they saw happening in the world, but had no feedback to give. Back in those days, no one really contemplated for themselves; they usually just pondered and hid what they truly felt. Everyone except for authors, poets, and writers, like for example: Charles Bukowski. Usually when people think of the name “Bukowski”, a huge question mark pops into mind…
Being able to mess around and basically have fun in works of fiction and do things that you can’t do in real life is something that I always admired from video games. Playing games, devoting myself to games, and keeping up with the latest news on games are the reasons as to why i’m apart of the gaming
Dave Berry, writer of Guys vs Men, starts off his article by talking about men and what they are like. He then starts talking about “guys” and what he means by that word. To explain the word, he gives characteristics: Guys like neat stuff, guys like a really pointless challenge, and guys do not have a rigid and well-defined moral code. His first topic is that guys like neat stuff.
Ferreday argues in her article that “reading disorders” inhibits our ways of hopeful thinking through media, which dismisses the potential of digital media on building connections. Most of Ferreday’s article is dense, which make it hard for readers to comprehend the main ideas of this literary work. Reading through this article was difficult due to the organization and diction of the article.
Johnson states, “ I happen to be a great believer in this wave, but there is no avoiding the reality that the shift from pro to am comes at some cost”(470). He expresses that 1.0 websites have their share of professionalism but 2.0 websites offer way more. Johnson goes on to say, “ This is a perfectly legitimate debate to have,
Nobody wants to be labeled as something they are not, It is like using someone 's past to predict the future and that is something you can 't do because people change. Lastly having stereotypes adds on to racial profiling because the cops also have stereotypical ideas. Moreover, variety of stories is shared by personal experiences, people sharing their story individually. A single story according to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, is a limited viewpoint. Instead of seeing other cultures and people as possessing multiple diverse experiences, single stories reduce certain cultures and people into a simple stereotype.