Two, these student athletes put in lots of work and even sometimes have to miss class to go to the sports event. They have to put in work on and off the field of court. Three, the coaches and everybody else but the players are paid. These kids take time from their school work and personal things to get things done for their sports team and don’t get anything in return. “Nick Saban will make $11 million in the year of 2018 coaching the football team of Alabama University.” (www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/6778847/college-athletes-deserve-paid.)
The pro athletes get paid for their hard work why don't college athletes?College do as much hard work as the pros but they still do not get paid.They both compete for championships and practice almost everyday.College athletes have to wait to go to the pros to get money when they should get it now.College athletes work on their sport everyday like a job so you should get money in exchange for your work and labor. Athletes need to be healthy but how can they do that without the right food which cost money.Athletes can't keep up with sports if they are not healthy.College athletes also won't have any time getting a job because of all their training and studying.Athletes have gym too which also cost money.most colleges do not require gyms so they do not have them.Without these things athletes will begin to stop being healthy and break down during practice. If all the
My main point on that question could be that these average students are not put on display on a daily basis, these athletes or put on television or the radio, and they make the NCAA and their respected schools money every time they pay the game. They deserve to see some of that profit, they are the reason that these school are making money, but they will never see any of
One quote from Shabazz Napier who is a college player seemed to be disturbing as he said “Sometimes there’s hungry nights where I’m not able to eat, but I still got to play up to my capabilities.” Because of this many people feel college players should get paid because they have no job yet, they are making tons of money for their school. Unlike professional players who get paid millions to play and are essentially doing the same things for their team. To conclude, there are many similarities between professional and college basketball but, there is also a difference to both. Even though there is a difference they are both viewed as a great sport for all the fans. Players may disagree, mostly college players but if they make it to be a professional they will get paid all the money they
Did you know that depending on the sport, students who play sports in college most likely have less than a 2% chance of becoming professional athletes? At middle schools, high schools and colleges across the country, everyone is arguing over whether or not students with failing grades should be allowed to play sports. In my opinion, a good education is so very important for our country’s youth, especially the athletes. Not a lot of kids are good enough to play in the top college sports programs in the country. But even those who are, still have an astonishingly low chance at making the professional leagues.
If athletes don't get paid the colleges can’t always expect for the college athletes to perform well throughout games and be able to use all their effort since they won’t be healthy or strong will out any cash. They might be afraid of the expenses that they will have to pay if injured. If colleges don't pay the athletes the athletes might perform badly in games which will draw fewer people spending their money to see them. This is one of the reasons college athletes should be
In essence they are spending as much time playing and practicing as professionals but are not getting paid for it. For example, Aaron Rodgers is the highest ranked quarterback in the NFL, Cody Kessler is the highest ranked quarterback in college football, both do the same amount of work in practice and in games, only Rodgers gets paid. Unless professionals start playing for free, which won’t happen, then college athletes should start getting some respect and money. Likewise an article written on why college athletes should be compensated for their efforts gave examples of professional players compared to college players, “Kobe Bryant, Chris Paul, Clayton Kershaw and Cody Kessler are major stars in the Los Angeles sports market; however, while Bryant, Paul and Kershaw are compensated handsomely for leading their
As we all know, college can be very expensive. With the scholarships and grants, college student-athletes can go to school for free and get their day-to-day needs such as food, housing, clothes, etc. Ackerman and Scotts, purpose is to show that college is a learning experience and with the help of college sports, the student-athletes will have a chance to grow and be successful in life rather than being exploited. However, critics believe that college student-athletes should be paid salary, like professional athletes, because they want people to see the “athletes are the rule, not the expectation” (par 11). They want the audience to think that it’s a rule for student-athletes to go play pro after two years, will no expectation.
Colleges simply do not have a lot of money, so they can not afford to have sports. However, this writer 's take on the money issue is that, the institution has to find a way to make money, even if that means charging a fee in the tuition. The college has to give every chance they can for the student to be successful. The college gives the theatre student a chance to go on to further their dreams, they should do the same with athletics. Now, this writer knows that it cost more money to build a football field and have equipment for the players than to build a theatre.
This leaves no time for them to be able to have a full time job, or even a part time job. Without a steady source of income many student athletes have no access to money for crucial items that they need, such as gas in their vehicle or the insurance that covers their vehicle and so on; subsequently, students are not able to travel to places that they wish to go. However, if they were paid a stipend every week during their season, it would provide a steady source of income until their season ends and athletes can join the work force once again. Once an athlete starts a job after their season, they would not need the stipend anymore and the stipend money would be used towards the next wave of student athletes starting new seasons. With new sport seasons starting year round, there will also be new injuries year round.
The college uses that money on pointless things. When instead they could be paying their players who are generally making most of the money. Because people buy tickets to watch the players play not to just give the college money or to come watch the coach. The coaches make millions of dollars and get credited for the success of the players. Which isn 't fair because the
There has been major discussion recently if college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid while they are in school. Some people say that they are already getting a scholarship which is more than anybody else, therefore they believe it is considered being greedy. Let 's not be greedy and look at how much a scholarship is actually worth. In college most athletes don 't last at a school for the whole four years. Once you get a sport involved there are politics, injuries, and a call from the office to tell the player thanks, but we don 't need you on this team anymore.
It would be really helpful for some students to get some extra money. An associated press article, “Paying college athletes fits modern reality”, explained that some students come from poor families. Why not let them earn some extra bucks? It states, “They might be sufficient for students with academic scholarships, who can supplement their income by working after class. Athletes often can’t.” This shows that students who come from poor families can’t work after classes even if they wanted to because of practice.
The Grand Debate The grand debate of whether to pay college athletes continues today. Yet, today there are so many other amenities provided to the athletes that they are practically paid through those. College coaches receive sky high salaries, the booster clubs donate millions of dollars to the university 's athletic program but those who are actually performing and competing do not get paid. As a former athlete, I do not think college athletes should be paid. Most already have paid tuition and amenities.
I personlly think NCAA athletes should get paid, because they put a lot on the line to play college ball. Yea they might get paid in free education but you got to look on the other side how are they to support they self for personal needs like tooth paste, cloths, shoes, soap, and many more. What about the ones that go out of there home state and play. Their family many miles away so they can’t get to much support from them. Other sports fans do not want to see athletes paid because they say “ it will destroy their notion of amateur athletics.” They stick with the belief that a “free education” is compensation enough for what the athletes provide for the school.