ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Age-Based Health Care Rationing

656 Words3 Pages

There are thousands of people in the world who oppose the idea of age based healthcare rationing. Some believe that if we ration healthcare based on age, that it would take away rights and justices from the elderly population (scu.edu). Like mentioned in the article by Claire Andrea and Manuel Velasquez, “Aged-Based Health Care Rationing”, when people refer to the justice part, they believe that everyone should be treated similarly unless there are rules or morals presented that require them to be treated differently. Yes, everyone should be treated equally, but healthcare rationing is not going to treat people differently, only the medical resources would be rationed. Andrea and Velasquez make a good point in the article, they say by rationing medical resources it would increase the economic productivity of the young, making it more beneficial for the whole world. More and more people are starting to get older everyday, and there are less young individuals compared to the older ones. Due to this fact, many people believe that healthcare can not be rationed based on a person age. They believe that you can not determine a …show more content…

The basic right principle goes along the same lines as everyone being treated equally and that rationing it would prevent people from living out their normal life span. However, like Callahan, Andrea, Velasquez, and Smith mention in their different articles, by the age of 70 or 80, most people have lived out their normal life span and has had the chance to accomplish different life goals and possibilities. Therefore, by rationing the healthcare and providing more for the younger age individuals it gives them the chance to live to that same exact age and accomplish their own life goals, and eventually this leads to everyone being treated equally and

Show More
Related

  • Argumentative Essay: Is Universal Healthcare Good For America?

    693 Words  | 3 Pages

    Though intended to provide medical coverage to its citizens and therefore protect their lives, universal healthcare would make the government an active agent in deciding when to end patients’ lives. End of life issues are an inextricable part of medical practice, whether they are related to elderly care, life-altering diseases, or controversial issues such as abortion or euthanasia. Instead of making a principled defense of its citizens’ right to life, universal healthcare would force the government to make pragmatic, cost based decisions regarding the perseveration of life. One can already see evidence for this in current debates about the cost of medical care for the elderly and serious discussions in the halls of congress about the economic value of euthanasia and abortion. Such debates ought to act as a warning for all regarding the means by which life will be measured and valued in a system of universal healthcare.

    Read More

  • Lyndon Baines Johnson's Proposal For Future Welfare

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Lyndon Baines Johnson, John F. Kennedy’s former Vice President, had magnificent aspirations concerning the future welfare of the country. At the University of Michigan’s commencement speech, exactly six months after John F. Kennedy’s assassination in Texas, Johnson spoke of his vision of ‘The Great Society.’ The intent of this vision was to transform the state of the U.S. and build a better, tougher, stronger nation that would be a witness to its own substantial progress through its domestic programs. It would be a nation where the whole society was cared for; it would be a nation where segregation and racism ceased to exist; it would be a nation where all were welcomed to come. He understood the undertaking that awaited him in the

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay: Should We Have Universal Health Care?

    588 Words  | 3 Pages

    Health care for everyone is able to give people time out of the financial debt if they have no insurance. When you have no insurance you have to pay out of pocket for all doctor visits and also you might be rejected medical help. So when there is everyone on one page with health care you are able to have your finances in tack a little more also if it becomes more inexpensive for the people. Don 't you think that your body is worth the try?The government makes millions dollars of the medical industry weather prescription drugs,insurance companies,and doctor visits. When everyone is the same that means the government would have to set one set prices for everyone to be able to survive financially in it and not everyone is able to go into

    Read More

  • Single Payer Universal Healthcare System

    1605 Words  | 7 Pages

    but it also greatly reduces the administrative and non-medical waste that has no benefits to patients. Pursuit of profit and wealth should not be in a field that is meant to care for others; companies and corporations are maximizing on patients’ misfortunes and are therefore shortchanging the quality of care in order to get the most money. This was warned by Maimonides in 1190 AD when he said “Do not allow thirst for profit, ambition for renown, and admiration to interfere with my profession for these are the enemies of truth and can lead me astray in the great task of attending to the welfare of your creatures” (Nelson, Alan). Despite the fact that a single payer universal healthcare system is not advocated by any current presidential candidate, it is both morally and economically the most sound system.

    Read More

  • Should The Canadian Health Care System Be Privatized

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    He believes that by having a mixed health care system, citizens can bring out just the positives of each individual system. The basis of citizen III’s argument is consumer options. His argument suggest that health care can still be provided to all individuals but consumers would be able to have the option of paying additional to get treatments faster in private clinics or pay for extra layer of protection not funded by the universal health care system. I disagree with citizen III’s statement because as long as at the end of the day, you receive medical services you required, then that is all that matters. The time needed to wait for a medical service is a want and not a need.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Medicaid In America

    862 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the United States, Medicare is the program supports people over age 65 with medical care. It also provides support for persons with certain disabilities and people of all ages who have kidney failure. Medicaid is a state administered program that provides medical support for a broad range of people. However, each state administers Medicaid individually and this creates inconsistencies in the program across the country. There are specific rules for judging just how much money someone receiving Medicaid can make and be eligible.

    Read More

  • Universal Healthcare Argument Analysis

    412 Words  | 2 Pages

    As stated before, even though the universal system may decrease the quality of care, at least all citizens can receive equal care. Everyone's health is important, but unfortunately not everyone can receive the care they need. The statistical reasoning presented in the first editorial may convince someone of higher power to allow everyone to receive the healthcare they need and deserve. The universal healthcare system could save many people's lives. Isn't that why people become doctors?

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Health Care

    741 Words  | 3 Pages

    Healthcare in the United States is in desperate need of reform. There are several rationales to further explain this proposition. As an illustration, the Declaration of Independence states our unalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In other words, every individual should be entitled to healthcare as it preserves life and promotes the general welfare. The federal government should, therefore, enact a program of universal health to better protect and serve all of its citizens.

    Read More

  • Essay On Single Payer Health Care

    1318 Words  | 6 Pages

    The United States no longer posses the ability to effectively drive down premium costs through the means of insuring healthy people. For example there is a town with ten houses, and, on average, one house a year burns down. If no one in the town pays for insurance they have a 10% chance of their house burning down each year. If everyone in the town pays insurance they spread the risk because no matter whose house burns down no one will have to pay anything as the insurance company will cover the cost of the house that burns down each year and make a slight profit. This is the same logic applied to the whole medical insurance market.

    Read More

  • Universal Health Care Argumentative Essay

    727 Words  | 3 Pages

    Health care is essential for Americans despite pre-existing conditions, and a free market insurance program would allow citizens to received the health care that is so desperately needed. A universal health care system is a matter of human rights and would solve America’s problem of one sixth of the population being

    Read More

  • Summary Of The New Normal By David Brooks

    551 Words  | 3 Pages

    The idea that cuts should be made widely and fairly is very important. Instead of heavily cutting a couple of programs, the government should make smaller budget cuts to many programs. Moreover, there should be more investment in the youth, and more cuts to the elderly of our country. Furthermore, fifty percent of healthcare cost occur in the last six months of life. We should not be investing so much time and money just so one person can live an extra six months.

    Read More

  • Baby Boomers Thesis

    847 Words  | 4 Pages

    Analysis of Healthcare to Thesis Healthcare is important to our well being, which is why we have free health care. That also means that Canadians have the burden of paying higher taxes in order to have free health care. Argument #4: The Aging

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Universal Healthcare

    733 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first premise is the biggest argument against universal health care. It is going to cause an increase in our taxes.

    Read More

  • Health Care Should Be Free For Everyone Essay

    704 Words  | 3 Pages

    When considering the choice if basic health care should be free for everyone, the choice should definitely be yes. Basic health care should be free for everyone because it will save the lives of people who wouldn 't ordinarily live, it has been shown by two sources that it will help slow the growth of health costs, and providing free health care will also lead to providing insurance for people who don 't have insurance yet. If basic health care does not become free for everyone, our population will drop. The only people left in the world will be the people who are rich and have enough money to have free health care. Basic health care should be free for everyone because it 's the right thing to do and we’re helping each other

    Read More

  • Essay On Health Care Cost

    1533 Words  | 7 Pages

    This is so because, universal access to health will really do good to the world and it is a Necessity in order to reduce the level of discrimination experienced in terms of finances . Universal access to health will ensure that there will be access to equitable quality health care and will also give security to those who are financially incapable at the present to afford quality health care die to their financial status. Although this may be the case in the future, there will face challenges especially in implementing the regulations that would be set up in order to enable equal distribution of medical resource and

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Age-Based Health Care Rationing

Open Document