With the money that the school makes, they can buy better technology for the students like computers, tablets, e-readers, etc. People think that it’s not good to sell fast food at schools mostly because it affects the student’s health. That’s why it has some advantages like the students will actually eat the food, students will learn how to be more responsible, and the school will make money out of
In other words, students that have good records and have good grades should be able to go. This would narrow the problem of safety concerns down. Having an option to go get food from a restaurant as a reward for good grades might encourage other students to try harder. Adrian Johnson stated, “Make off-campus lunch possible for upperclassmen” (16). Others may say, “By allowing kids to leave for lunch, they have more opportunities to eat healthier food” (“Top” 6).
As you know, numerous schools sell junk food at lunch. Students may enjoy a sweet treat during the school day, but others are thinking differently, that the junk food should be kicked out and replaced with healthier foods. Even though a healthier lunch program would be expensive and take some time to get used to, schools should use it. Providing students unhealthy foods can lead to obesity, it can cause early unhealthy habits; and students should have enough time to eat these healthy foods at lunch. The surplus of junk food available to students in public schools has the potential to lead to a high rate of obesity in youth which can have very many negative effects on students physical health.
Have you ever been so hungry because you didn’t have time to eat? Has that ever affected you in class? Out of a 100 student 85 said that the feel rushed or doesn 't have enough time to eat. That why kindergarten-8 students need to have a 45 - 60 minutes lunch time because it improves efficiency in class, it improves students moods, and improves students’ chances of not becoming obese. First a shorter lunch can cause your body physical harm and cause you to feel sick, light headed, or have organ problems and more.
I believe public schools should have lunches that are good and good for you. The reason being that student go to school for about 7 hours. They work hard for the grades they have. It doesn 't seem fair to feed them something that is most often disgusting and bad for them when they try so hard. True, they could bring lunch from home, but what happens if they forget or can make lunch to school.
Firstly, the school does offer some more fresh and healthy options to feed the students. These fresh options are often a favorite among students, and as such many people go to the areas which provide these choices first at lunch. This popularity causes problems though, as there are few places to get these foods from. For instance, there is only one area to get fresh sandwiches and only one to get fresh Mexican food. Even with these positives, the school still gives kids free chips with their sandwiches.
i would like better lunch because they would and other students will agree because many waste up to 50 dollars a week and by changing to better food they can save that money for other stuff . and many would use the for other things for themselves because many people may get minimum wage. And other people don't even eat at all and they are hungry all the day but wont eat because they don't like the food and also they might feel light headed and their stomach might hurt. And also the custodians because some don't even do
While it is important that government support for school meals reduces economic hardship, increased efforts to also improve the nutrition among low-income children are still needed in the program. These efforts should be coupled with a broader focus on reducing empty calorie consumption and incentivizing healthy eating among low-income children. Often times, many lower income students will forego a healthier snack for a bag of chips and a soda. The school has a hand in perpetuation this issue by using funds for bulk goods that typically turn out to be snack foods or high calorie breakfast items.
“Healthy school lunch means students are getting the nourishment they need to power their minds and bodies to learn.”-Unknown. This quote is relevant because students need good, healthy food to be able to focus in class. When the students have eaten a good healthy food they won’t be worrying about when they’re going to get their next meal. The food needs to actually look edible for kids to even think about eating it. Children go home sick because of the low quality lunches.
Sure many people such as Michelle Obama have tried to reform the school lunch menu, but the schools don’t seem to follow the regulations posted. The quality and nutrition of lunch at Lawton Community Schools, and many other schools, needs to be improved. With recent changes been made to the nutritional standards in school lunches, it seems that schools are increasing nutrition, but decreasing quality. “A recent USA Today investigation found that the nation’s largest fast-food chains have higher quality and safety standards for the meat … than what the U.S. Department of Agriculture has for the meat used for the National School Lunch Program...” (Buffenbarger). The food we serve our kids across the country has regulations, but all in the wrong places.
The kids stomachs are desperate but not desperate enough to eat the school lunch.The Healthy slop makes stomachs quiver in fear. Michelle Obama has put into use the Hunger, Hunger free Kids Act, that will help feed kids from low income families with healthy lunches . Some people suggest that the new lunches are healthier with less salt and fat; however, they fail to recognize kids are disgusted by the food given to them and sometimes throw most of it away. Therefore, Parents should not agree with the new school lunch requirements Admittedly, some people think that kids are getting the required amount of nutrition. They also think this is a low cost way to feed their kids.
Hook and topic sentence To Begin With, having Off-Campus lunch for middle school students has many benefits for students and teachers. Students will be able to focus because they ate. Teachers won’t have to always tell the students to pay attention in class because they got all of their energy out and students won’t be so hungry. In an article from DailyAmerican.com Tyler Sanners states, that “I believe that students should be able to leave school grounds for lunch only if they have transportation and parental consent.” Cafeteria food is expensive, and doesn’t fill your stomach. BryanHighNorseman.com states, that “ food is really expensive for the school.
There are reasons like, it doesn 't hold you for the rest of the day, etc. Say I eat school lunch, probably like the period after, I 'd get hungry yet again because not only do they limit the lunch food, but it 's not enough for most of our appetites.” Most kids do not eat school lunch because of that fact that it is tasteless and not beneficial. Students should be able to leave school during lunch to get away from smelly