On, February 14, 2018, a mass school shooting in Florida got the nation’s attention, however, gun violence has always been an issue, and it is only getting worse. Now people are saying there needs to be something done, and there are many that agree. Starting off there should be stricter gun laws, because in today’s world it is too easy to get handguns and assault rifles. With, the capabilities a firearm holds, such as taking people’s lives there must be stricter restrictions that could help cut down the gun violence and save lives. Increasing the age of purchasing a firearm would be one step.
It would help if were to get into a gunfight with a terrorist. Defense is not my only concern to have an extended clip, could also be used for hunting. Hunting is a sport people all around the world have done, some do it just to eat, some do it for the fun and eat it. If an intruder broke in and you had a revolver it wouldn’t stop a person at the size of 6 ft or taller and 250 pounds or more. Change the legal age of owning a gun I wish the state of Georgia would change the legal age of owning a gun from 21 to 18.
As our guns have changed, our laws regarding who can carry and what sort of gun they can carry should change as well. In Florida there was a shooting at Majority Douglas High School. The laws in Florida did nothing to protect the students and faculty from this tragedy. Therefore, improved gun control laws could have prevented this from occurring. Reforming gun control laws must be a priority.
Purchasing a gun doesn’t mean it has to be at a gun at a store, because people sell used guns all the time. If someone wants a gun really bad and if they can’t get one because of their past, that doesn’t mean they won’t find one. There is already a black market for guns and if any laws get passed, the market will just expand. That will make it easier for people to get guns. Guns will never be under control; It’s like trying to stop illegal immigrants from coming into America, it won’t
(Ingraham, 2015) In conclusion, based on the information provided, depending on where you stand there are both pros and con gun safety. The pro is that when it comes to gun safety, there should be policies in place, such as gun lock requirements to help prevent childhood gun deaths. The con is that many gun owners feel that it is not the government’s place to tell them how to store their guns and feel that it is an invasion of their
Regardless, if Marie is carrying a gun to protect herself along with the required age, twenty-one and over, and her weapon is concealed, her reflexes have to be quick in order not to get shot. According to Admiral McRaven in the article “Texas Lawmakers Pass a Bill Allowing Guns at Colleges” he states, “I am a guy that loves my guns. I have all sorts of guns. I just do not think bringing guns on campus is going to make us any safer. If you have ever been shot at, which I have, then you have an appreciation for what a gun can do.”
Equally as important it will reduce gun violence. Sixty-six percent of Americans support gun control. These individuals support background checks meaning if one has had a bad past or serve mental illness they will not be able to get a gun, and ninety-seven percent of Americans and gun owners support that. Pursuing this further sixty-seven to twenty-nine percent support a nationwide ban on assault weapons. Furthermore, eighty-three to fourteen percent want a mandatory wait
Without gun control in the US or some high security in our schools and maybe even giving all the teachers handguns to protect families in our communities. “There has been 18 mass shooting just this year, two months into the year 2018”,”(Boston Globe inc). The laws would help decrease the amount of mass shootings that might happen in the near future. Although Americans feel that not having gun control is their constitutional right, gun control will help prevent guns falling into the wrong hands and can lower gun deaths in the US tremendously. (Rewrite this sentence and integrate the quote better)“Australia has not had a mass shooting for at least 23 year to be exact in counting because of their gun laws enforced in 1996 (Bostonglobe,boston,Inc,2018,url)”.
Guns are a cost-benefit ratio along with everything else in this world. Guns don’t fire by themselves, so why do we need to outlaw guns when the gun doesn’t pull its own trigger? Instead, we need to work with the people using them. Gun laws are to keep people that aren’t supposed to have guns from getting guns and they are also in place to protect the people who have guns and give them the right to bear arms. Studies show that gun ownership has increased incredibly while at the same time crime has decreased to historic lows The second amendment says people have the right to bear arms and they can’t be taken away.
Since the tragedy happened in Orlando, 49 people have been killed under the gun. The controversy of the gun controls arises, which has impacted both on democrats, republicans and candidates. Each side sticks on their standpoint, and still debated about it. Trump did not clearly indicate his position on the firearms, but he said “he will save and protect the Second Amendment”. Trump is also trying to suggest if Clinton wins the election, then she will not allow to bear gun.
The thing that people don 't understand is that, yes gun owners want to take advantage of this open carry law, but most people that have their license will still conceal their weapons as they don 't want the attention. Most say that when the heat, calms down on all the law changing that they might be more comfortable with open carrying so it’s more of a usual thing to be around. Now gun carriers know all the risk of having their guns visible. Most of the instructors that teach the classes tell them that showing your gun can possibly make you the first target in a situation. Having an open carry they know that it could backfire on them.
Where the weapons were obtained in the sandy hook shooting and the Orlando shooting were dramatically different. Lanza took the weapons from his mother who owned them legally, but Lanza was unable to have firearms because of his mental illness. Mateen was cleared by the federal background check even though the FBI did some monitoring on him. His radical beliefs caught the eye of the federal government, but someone 's religion can not be used to stip individuals of their rights. Lastly he explains that, “cultural beliefs are significantly related to people’s opinions about gun control, but the strongest, most consistent predictors of people’s gun control preferences are their political beliefs and affiliations,” (Wozniak 2).
In the world we live in today guns are surrounded throughout society placing harm on people and their lives. Though guns are expected to be limited by the government they are obtainable almost to all people of all ages in which should not be acceptable. In Molly Ivins essay “Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get rid of Guns” the author speaks upon the misuse of guns and it's over accessibility to regular people. Therefore I claim that well trained and disciplined individuals who work for the government should only be entitled to firearms in order to destroy the irresponsible use of guns. Ivins essay argues that allowing uncontrollable citizens to have guns is ruining the security of our free state.
Toby Crabtree AICE student number: 2567 Center US015 Word count: 1856 Does gun ownership make society safer? Humanity has been using guns for decades now. Guns have been utilized for many reasons. Hunters use guns to bring home food to keep their families from starving. Soldiers use guns to protect their country and those that live there.