Alyssa Cochran
LA I Adv.
Mr. Patty
26 April 2023
The Issue of Gun Control
Despite the heated debates over gun control, one question remains: how effective are gun regulation laws? Gun control laws have been a long-debated issue, leaving countless Americans questioning their effectiveness. Increasing gun control laws or implementing a complete gun ban is unnecessary and ineffective because it will not prevent criminals from obtaining firearms, the dangers of gun-free zones are increasingly prevalent, and such laws would infringe on personal freedom and individual responsibility.
Additional rigorous gun regulations will not prevent criminals from acquiring firearms. Criminals are more likely to turn to black markets and theft to obtain firearms
…show more content…
With gun control restrictions, there would be an uprising in gun-free zones. The problem with gun control laws is the overall lack of protection for workplaces, schools, or any public area. Madmen and criminals do not comply with gun-free zones, and it seems they are more likely to target weapon-free regions because of the lack of defense or security. A recent study shows that 97.8% of mass shootings target gun-free zones (The Effects of Gun-Free Zones). It is clear that criminals not only do not follow the gun-free zone rules, but they also do not care about the number of laws they violate while committing heinous acts of …show more content…
The Second Amendment mentions that for the proper security of the country, citizens should have the right to bear arms (Madison). The amendment indicates that any regulations preventing citizens from obtaining firearms could violate the amendment. If the goal is to stop crime, it is questionable how effective the laws would be because criminals do not adhere to legislation. The regulations would punish law-abiding citizens for protecting themselves and their families rather than criminals, who would ignore the law, violating the amendment, adding to the issue. If there is no one to protect schools, homes, or public places, vulnerability to crime becomes an issue. Also, the country does not have the right to prohibit law-abiding citizens from using guns for protection, sport, or hunting. It is an important personal right to bear arms to protect oneself and their country.
Gun control laws have long been a source of contention, with numerous Americans questioning their efficacy. Increased gun control laws have proven unnecessary and ineffective because they will not prevent criminals from obtaining firearms, gun-free zones may bring more dangers, and such laws would violate personal freedom and individual responsibility. Overall, gun laws have repeatedly proved to put a burden on law-abiding citizens rather than meeting their purpose of stopping
Gun control has always been a very controversial topic ever since the founding fathers gave the citizens the right to bear arms but with recent school shootings, mass shootings and the amount of them increasing every year, gun control has been getting increasingly more controversial and as more people lean to harsher gun control to stop the growing problem. But all the reasons for harsher gun control do have their own causes that can be stopped at the source of them. Gun control is unconstitutional, it should not limit the citizens second amendment, gun control would not slow down gun and gang related crime, restricting or banning guns would not slow down school shootings, and outright banning would cause another prohibition like scenario.
Any further restrictions would fail to achieve the goal of preventing guns from getting into the wrong hands. (Reason #3) Gun control laws infringe upon the right to self defense and deny people a sense of safety. (Evidence) A huge part of why the second amendment was established was to protect the people from government tyranny. The Founding Fathers included it because they themselves had experienced the same tyranny at the hands of the British monarchy.
Proponents of more gun control laws believe that the Second Amendment was intended exclusively for militias, that gun restrictions have always existed, and that gun regulations would prevent criminals from possessing firearms. However, Opponents claim that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns, that guns are needed for self-defense, and that gun ownership helps to dissuade crime. Because of this obvious difference, proponents of stricter firearm regulation demand more laws to help prevent mass shooting, and want reform in the area of background checks. Meanwhile, opponents of gun laws often accuse the proponents of manipulating a mass tragedy in order to further strengthen their fight. Gun ownership has been a tradition within the united states since before the country itself was formed.
Im assuming that no one in here will ever go out and commit a violent crime involving a firearm. However i cant guarantee that some people we are around everyday will not be involved in a violent crime. I'd like to tell you today why gun control should not be put into large scale effect . I'd like to bring up the number of violent crimes involving firearms in the united states in the year of 2013 before the bulk of the gun control movement had started (refer to chart). IN the year 2013 there were 16,121 homicides nation wide and out of that number 11,208 of them were caused by a firearm of those deaths approximately 750 of the murders were committed with an illegally owned firearm which shows that you do not have to be a felon that is unable to possess a firearm in order to take someones life with one.
Having strict gun control laws would prevent civilians from protecting themselves against attackers and invaders. While there is a call for strict gun control laws it is impossible for the law makers and law enforcers to protect everyone all the time so having this in place prevents a person from his own protection. Gun ownership allows persons to be protected and this is not something gun control does effectively. The Pew Research Center, which is well known for conducting numerous types of research, has conducted many surveys on this issue and one important trend noticed is that there is more support by Americans for gun rights when compared to gun control. Based on interviews done, 52% of the persons said it was more important to protect
Gun control endangers American’s constitutional right to bear arms. Politicians and civilians alike mistakenly think that revoking our constitutional right to keep and bear arms will ensure the end of gun violence in our country. Taking away our guns by criminalizing the purchase or ownership of guns will not keep weapons out of the hands of violent criminals. If we criminalize guns the violent gun-slinging criminals we worry about would continue to purchase them illegally through the black market. Marginalizing our right to bear arms endangers civilians due to the fact that those laws only affect law abiding citizens, rendering them defenseless.
Jeremiah Briseno Ms. Heather Walker College Prep English Feb 24, 2023 Argumentative Essay: Gun Control The issue of gun control has been a highly controversial topic in the United States. The debate centers around whether or not the government should regulate the ownership and use of firearms. Gun control advocates argue that strict regulations can reduce the number of gun-related crimes and deaths, while opponents of gun control argue that such regulations infringe on the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
Gun Control Gun control over the years has been a controversial subject, with people arguing for both sides. The 2nd amendment states that everyone in the U.S. has a right to bear arms. Mass shootings and suicides by firearm have been a growing concern for many people living in the U.S. Numerous people making the argument that there should be more gun control. Having gun control would help lessen the deaths by firearms in the country for a variety of reasons.
Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.
Gun Control Gun control has become a polarizing and controversial issue around the globe. There have been many reported issues of mass shootings both in schools and in the public, making it a hot button issue. Proponents argue that, if the government strictly controls the ownership of guns, such tragedies can be prevented. Most Americans have an obsession with guns because the law allows them to do so. Therefore, they are always ready to scoff at anyone trying to control gun ownership.
In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.
Alexis Clarke Professor Frank English 110 29 October 2015 Gun Control Will Not Eliminate Crime The big issue of gun control in the United States, is that many people believe that it takes away the 2nd Amendment rights, which is the right to bear arms. Citizens of the United States are promised the the right to bear arms in the Constitution, and by applying gun control laws takes away that same right. Crime is high enough in cities with very few laws pertaining to gun control, but taking guns away from people who are registered with license will not solve the problem either. Placing more limitations on gun owners, particularly responsible gun owners, will not reduce gun violence.
Gun control also limits our constitutionally derived right to own firearms. If gun control is enforced, law-abiding citizens will be forced to give up their guns and their right to own guns, while many criminals who own guns may illegally keep theirs. As the saying goes “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” Guns are an important aspect of our society in many ways. They allow for protection, recreation, and hunting.
Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.
Gun laws simply penalize and restrict honest citizens while criminals continue to find ways and loopholes to arm themselves. Gun laws currently established serve their purpose rather poorly as criminals unceasingly buy guns even after they are said to be forbidden. History serves as a clear example of how guns protect the rights and liberties of individuals as it was private guns that aided colonists in fighting the British and gaining America’s