Gun control is a rising issue in the United States, it is heard about in the news, social media and among the public. Before choosing a side, look at the facts: “Beginning with Columbine in 1999, more than 187,000 students attending at least 193 primary or secondary schools have experienced a shooting on campus during school hours, according to a year-long Washington Post analysis.” (COX 2018) “That could never happen in my school” is what all students, teachers and parents say when they watch a news report on another school shooting. Nowadays, children are so accustomed to the idea of school shootings, even children of ages that don’t know how to do long division. Education reporter Caroline Glenn wrote an article in Florida Today entitled …show more content…
Her mom won’t allow it. Cheree Crawford is fraid the flashing lights will give away her daughter’s hiding spot if a shooter ever infiltrates her school.” (Glenn 2018) Miss Crawford isn’t the only parent in Brevard County in angst after the Parkland shooting two-hundred miles away. Another quote from the article discusses the fear parents are experiencing and their recent realizations, “Many parents in Brevard County who never before paid much attention to security at their children’s schools are now concerned about what safety measures are in place and are having conversations with their kids about what to do in an active shooter situation.” (Glenn 2018) Parents are starting to discuss safety issues in schools with their children, and children are beginning to learn. Your children are learning how to survive in school before they can work out simple math problems. Children are smart, they pick up on anything being said around them. They know when our country is going downhill, they can read statistics and reports: they …show more content…
So on average a twenty year-old can be the person protecting and teaching your children. Now imagine giving this twenty year-old a gun, a harmful weapon, and the trust to keep your child safe. We can barely trust our teachers to teach our kids what they should be taught, let alone expect them to protect our kids. A question I have for you is, where will they be getting these guns? Is the school district going to buy them? Because they can hardly buy all the classroom essentials for these educators, let alone buy a gun for every single teacher. Do they expect taxpayers to buy them? Will my taxes be increased because the school doesn’t want to cut the budget of the athletic program? This is basically an argument that should be debated to a wall. Another well used argument is about the Second Amendment, and whether controlling guns takes away those rights. Most folks assume whenever they hear “gun control” it means they’re getting their guns taken away, but they really aren’t. When we say “gun control” we mean making it a little bit more difficult to get a gun, and only having certain firearms available to civilians. Because the second amendment was meant for the military, and for those to use for self
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Violent criminals know that currently schools are gun free zones, and can use this factor to their advantage. Rather than falling victim to an attack on the school; teachers could protect themselves and their students. Students could feel much safer if their teacher was armed. Students would feel more safe if they knew they could be protected from an attack from an intruder or another student. Criminals know that teachers currently are not armed and could potentially see schools as a target.
School shootings are happening much more often, and a lot of schools aren’t doing much about it. From 1999 to 2011 the average school shooting were about two to three a year, now there are close to twenty-five a year. I think that a successful way to keep school shootings from happening would be to arm our teachers. Sure, putting guns in our school could give mischievous kids more of an opportunity to make bad decisions, but I doubt it. If kids knew that there were guns in the school than they wouldn’t want to start a school shooting because they themselves wouldn’t want to get hurt.
There have been many security measures done in schools to make them safer. From keeping the doors locked, hiring security guards, to installing metal detectors, schools have made many precautions to keep their students as safe as possible. Having teachers carry guns has been a newer idea to solving school shootings and it has brought up a lot of negative talk amongst Americans. Having teachers carry guns is not an effective way to protect schools because it negatively affects the teachers, parents, and the students. Arming teachers is not the answer to this issue because not all teachers will want to carry a gun and they will not have the skills to, which will prevent them from being the best teacher they can be, and arming teachers will also cost a ton of money, causing the
It is not going to protect anyone if a gun is in the hands of an unstable educator. Timothy Johnson from Media Matters for America mentioned that guns can distract teachers from their jobs as well. Johnson stated, “When you ask them [teachers] to be security guards, you are distracting them from their jobs” (1). If a teacher is acting as a security guard with no training, this will place the educator in more danger. A teacher is not fit to be a security guard, just as they are not fit to carry guns in their
With many accidental firings of firearms in homes around the country giving guns to first time gun owners in such a heavily populated area such as a school is seen a dangerous to some people. School security expert Ken Trump reported that “ school staff with guns would take on significant responsibility and potential liabilities that I firmly believe are beyond the expertise, knowledge-base, experience, and professional capabilities of most school boards and administrators” (Arming). Many people believe that giving guns to these first timers is a liability to the school district in case of an accidental firings that may injure or kill a student or employee. For this reason many parents don't feel safe leaving their children on the hands of first time gun owners. In the end both sides have one common goal which is student safety.
What a lot of people do not take into consideration is that the teachers must go through training and have to be liable to the responsibilities they are taking once they have a concealed carry weapon. Arming teachers could help lower the number of school shootings because the reaction times will be much faster, and it will add a bit of security to the children. Arming teachers will help lower the number of school shootings. If teachers are liable and are fine with carrying concealed weapons in schools, they would be able to respond to the site of the shooting much faster than it would be waiting for the police to arrive. Apart from having faster reaction times to the shooting, arming teachers will also add extra security to many students.
Gun control also limits our constitutionally derived right to own firearms. If gun control is enforced, law-abiding citizens will be forced to give up their guns and their right to own guns, while many criminals who own guns may illegally keep theirs. As the saying goes “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” Guns are an important aspect of our society in many ways. They allow for protection, recreation, and hunting.
This should not be a worry for the child or parents but it has to be because at this point any school is a threat. So a possible factor in decreasing shootings is arming teachers, by doing this teachers can fight back instead of shielding or running from the shooter. Reason #2 teachers can defend their students by changing this law and using correct training teachers should be able to carry a weapon. By doing this not only insure safety it will give relief for parents all over the country. This tactic will give school staffs a chance to outnumber a possible shooter.
But It actually increase the protection levels. Because the teachers have a something to defend themselves with instead of a number 2 pencil. My first piece of evidence is The superintendent of Harrold, Texas, school district sees guns as a tool used to defend oneself and loved ones. This proves That the superintendent is encouraging the teachers to get training. So they are allowed to carry a gun in school.
Teachers did not go into their profession to be babysitters, and they certainly didn 't go into it to be security guards. Now society is trying to force them to be both. How anyone could possibly secure those weapons so that students could never obtain them would be a nightmare- and unrealistic? And to think that if a school full of teenagers can access a weapon in every classroom that violence would decrease is absurd. There are many negatives to teachers owning guns such as: cost of training and weapons, teachers turning against their students, and keeping teacher who has the gun a secret.
Students today live their day-to-day lives in constant fear of what seems inevitable. The United States has one of the highests rates of school shootings in the world. Society has become so desensitized to these shootings that they are no longer shocked to hear about another school falling victim to it. Even when students take a stand against gun violence, the only solution offered to them is a proposition to arm teachers. However, bringing more guns into a school will only further deteriorate the situation.
Many schools in today’s society suffer from shootings at some point while children are attending school. Shootings in schools are not a new occurrence, and America has dealt with multiple shootings in public schools in which the lives of many children and teachers have been undeservingly taken (Elliott 528). Because of school shootings, this leaves our children in danger with no way to protect themselves. Gun violence in schools is an evident problem, and there are several ways to reduce the number of incidents, such as mental health screening for owners of guns, interconnectedness of communities, and more school funding.
The amount of people calling for a full ban are in the vast minority; most people advocating for gun control just want to make sure that average people, not the mentally ill or felons, can own a gun for self-defense, hunting or recreational shooting. There are more guns than people in this country, and while it may be difficult or pointless to regulate the legal, over the table purchase of them, it’s better than doing nothing, or letting teachers carry guns, which would do nothing but cause more chaos, fear, and deaths. Your 2nd amendment rights are not restricted by having to pass a background check or mental health test, in the same way that your 1st amendment rights are not restricted because you cannot say “fire!” in a movie theater or threaten someone’s life. Amendments need to adapt to be applicable, and an amendment written by people 240 years ago should not and will not be applied the same way as it is in the
As previously stated, not everyone in the United States wants to completely disappear the second amendment of the constitution. As we know that Texas is one of the states that is on favor of gun rights, and is less likely to get strict gun control laws. Teachers in elementary schools have the opportunity to share the importance of safety against any attacks to their elementary schools to young students. Parents have also the opportunity to approve for teachers to teach about these topics. If parents continue to ask for these teachings to help their children realize the importance of these safety educational topics, districts of these elementary schools will begging to hear the controversy, so will the government eventually.
Guns have no role in our country schools. Schools and colleges are places of education. Students should be free to learn in an environment away from every day violence. The catastrophes that took place at Sandy Hook Elementary School, Columbine High School, and Virginia Tech. confirm the penetrating conclusion guns have in our nation’s schools. Violence on campus has Students, Parent, and University Staff all concerned and looking for preventative measures.